AppWorx Workload Automation vs IBM Workload Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 12, 2023

We performed a comparison between AppWorx Workload Automation and IBM Workload Automation based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

Features: AppWorx Workload Automation is praised for its ease of use, consistent performance, straightforwardness, and trustworthiness. It is particularly effective in handling nightly tasks and performing calculations. IBM Workload Automation provides the option to request extra functionalities, initiate jobs across multiple nodes, and effortlessly monitor batch applications.

Users of AppWorx Workload Automation have expressed a need for enhanced API integration and improved integration with other tools, alongside better scalability. IBM Workload Automation users have faced challenges concerning performance, navigation, and job dependencies, and have also expressed a desire for enhanced reporting visibility.

Service and Support: AppWorx Workload Automation receives high praise for its customer service and support, with customers rating it positively. IBM Workload Automation customers value the technical support and suggest using IBM's lab advocacy program for comprehensive code support. However, there may be difficulties in pinpointing the origins of specific problems.

Ease of Deployment: The initial setup for AppWorx Workload Automation is straightforward and relatively easy, although it may seem complex to those who are unfamiliar with the system. It involves the administrator's access and involvement in deploying the system with databases. The initial setup for IBM Workload Automation can be challenging for individuals without knowledge of IBM tools or application development experience.

Pricing: AppWorx Workload Automation has a costly setup that is influenced by the number of orchestrated systems utilized. IBM Workload Automation offers pricing options based on the customer's contract, allowing for potential cost savings by transitioning to a per-job license.

ROI: AppWorx and IBM users do not discuss their experience with ROI.

Comparison Results: AppWorx Workload Automation is the preferred choice when compared to IBM Workload Automation. AppWorx offers a simple and easy setup process, a user-friendly interface, and reliable performance. It also provides improved simplicity and reliability, along with a recent UI transformation. Users appreciate its ability to efficiently manage numerous nightly jobs and perform calculations and processes during nighttime hours.

To learn more, read our detailed AppWorx Workload Automation vs. IBM Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Scheduling is a good feature.""The most valuable features of AppWorx Workload Automation are simplicity and reliability. Additionally, they recently transformed the UI which is better.""It is an object-based approach to task and process design in conjunction with conditional logic and event-based scheduling actions, which enables a build once/use often design methodology to be employed.""The solution is very user friendly so anyone can use it.""The automated solution is the most valuable piece. Otherwise, we would have to be doing everything manually on every server.""We have a lot of nightly jobs that need to be run. Therefore, we perform a lot of calculations and processes during nighttime hours.""It is really a robust product.""It has improved my organization through automation of back office and infrastructure procedures, and by integrating and orchestrating key business applications spanning multiple technology stacks."

More AppWorx Workload Automation Pros →

"Jobs can be triggered in multiple nodes.""The support from Cisco is very good. I was with them as a company for 40 years""This solution has a request feature where users can request the added features they need to have developed. Based on client voting for those features, these are developed and released.""I have supported this product in literally 100s of different environments and its unmatched in its ability to scale to any size.""Jobs can be triggered in multiple nodes.""The most important feature is the creation of folders. It's a really great feature because you can organize the process with naming conventions.""The whole product is valuable because it is a tool for batch automation.""The project we worked on involved the running of nearly 24,000 job instances in a single day, so I would say that the solution is stable."

More IBM Workload Automation Pros →

Cons
"It is difficult to integrate with the Active Directory (AD).""The compliance features are limited to the server and not the entire infrastructure.""The scalability could improve.""The graphical interface is pretty cool but not the best so it could use some improvement.""We are looking for additional features that would allow us to call APIs and integrate the product with other tools more effectively.""It has been a deprecated product, because it is so old. There has been a couple of new solutions that are a little more advanced.""Reporting, forecasting and intelligence could be improved.""As a general process automation and integration tool, it has been superseded by other offerings, notably the Workload Automation suite."

More AppWorx Workload Automation Cons →

"Slow down on the releases a bit. I fully understand that IWA functionality is increasing at an amazing rate, but trying to keep up with the upgrades is rough.""There should be more custom documentation, specifically around Java APIs. There should also be more training. In terms of features, we are currently using only 50% of its features. We don't use all features that are available, but there is always room for improvement in all of the tools.""It is missing some features and can improve in areas where the competition is somewhat better like linking job dependencies.""It would be helpful to have a mobile app that could be used to follow the job schedule.""The performance of the previous versions could be better.""Scalability-wise, it can be a little bit challenging.""This solution does have bugs and could be improved in this regard. However, these bugs are resolved relatively quickly.""It should support other schedulers that aren't IBM products."

More IBM Workload Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing options are fairly straightforward."
  • "We are satisfied with the pricing."
  • "The price for annual licenses is a bit expensive so pricing is rated a two out of ten."
  • "The cost model is based on the number of orchestrated systems used."
  • More AppWorx Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA."
  • "It is about one-third of the cost of a controller."
  • "The contract is with the customer with whom we are working, so IBM is not directly involved in this."
  • "We transitioned from a server license to per job license, and that saved us a lot money."
  • "Pricing depends on the number of agents that you install."
  • More IBM Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of AppWorx Workload Automation are simplicity and reliability. Additionally, they recently transformed the UI which is better.
    Top Answer:The cost model is based on the number of orchestrated systems used.
    Top Answer:Sometimes we have issues with the solution's stability. So, stability can be improved. Reporting and visibility of the solution need improvement. These days, we need more visibility. We need to access… more »
    Top Answer:We are using IBM Workload Automation to run batch operations. The development teams batches, and the team that makes a plan and schedules the batches to be executed, and keep track of the summary of… more »
    Ranking
    17th
    out of 49 in Workload Automation
    Views
    1,172
    Comparisons
    717
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    300
    Rating
    8.3
    13th
    out of 49 in Workload Automation
    Views
    5,157
    Comparisons
    3,509
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Automic Applications Manager
    IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler, IBM TWS
    Learn More
    Overview

    AppWorx Workload Automation automates your Ellucian’s Banner or Fiserv DNA processing. This innovative, best-in-class task scheduling solution accelerates your processing, provides visibility and control over business processes, and mitigates risk in both environments.

    AppWorx Workload Automation Can:

    • Automate banner processes without writing scripts
    • Automate testing
    • Document process flows and procedures
    • Maintain a history and audit trail of production runs
    • Automate migration from development to test to production environments
    • Reduce training
    • Eliminate human errors associated with manual tasks

    Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Ellucian’s Banner

    • Automate recurring business processes, such as administration and record-keeping, while complying with state and federal reporting requirements.
    • Batch jobs are processed accurately.
    • If there are any inconsistencies or job failures, Automic for Banner immediately sends email notifications to the appropriate personnel.
    • Significantly improve your return on investment.
    • Automating batch processing and report generation.
    • Eliminating server overload by using a combination of features (AppWorx provides queues to control the number of jobs that can be submitted to a server at any given time, can spot duplicate runs of the same reports, and can delay impromptu reports submitted by individuals until all regularly scheduled reports are processed, etc.).
    • Eliminates the need for developers to write shell, PERL, or batch scripts to automate scheduling.
    • Automatically keeps a history of every job run, the parameters that were used, and the output generated at each step. These records are readily available for viewing online and can be printed for reference.
    • Export and import utilities make migration an error-free, repeatable process. Database logins, printers, and libraries can be mapped when you are moving process flows to a new environment. Mapping eliminates potentially erroneous code changes.

    Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Fiserv DNA Processing

    • Run DNA jobs directly, eliminating the need to copy and release queues for each batch cycle.
    • Automatically run DNA jobs at the optimum time using sophisticated scheduling.
    • Run multiple DNA jobs at the same time in parallel from one batch station.
    • Eliminate potential data entry errors by automatically retrieving parameters from your enterprise databases.
    • Automatically check the results from one step to ensure data integrity before continuing to the next step.
    • Alert production analysts to problems the instant they occur.
    • Coordinate processing steps across all software applications.
    • Automatically distribute output files to vendors.
    • Perform all operations from one GUI client.

    Reviews from Real Users

    “The most valuable feature for me is the scheduling,” says an enterprise application architect at a retailer who has been using the solution for close to 10 years.

    A manager at a tech services company adds that “The interface is good. The compliance-related features are very good.”


    IBM Workload Automation is a complete solution for batch and real-time workload management, available for distributed mainframe or hosted in the cloud. Use it to drive business and IT workloads on hosted servers, with virtually no cost of ownership for your central server. Increase your productivity with powerful plan- and event-driven scheduling, and run and monitor your workloads wherever you are. This includes interfaces dedicated to application developers and operators, providing them both autonomy and precise governance.
    Sample Customers
    Sandvik, Hanwha Life
    Standard Life Group, Banca Popolare di Milano, A*STAR, ArcelorMittal Gent
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    University10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Computer Software Company11%
    University5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise90%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise82%
    Buyer's Guide
    AppWorx Workload Automation vs. IBM Workload Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AppWorx Workload Automation vs. IBM Workload Automation and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AppWorx Workload Automation is ranked 17th in Workload Automation with 7 reviews while IBM Workload Automation is ranked 13th in Workload Automation with 28 reviews. AppWorx Workload Automation is rated 8.0, while IBM Workload Automation is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AppWorx Workload Automation writes "The scheduling tool and finance module are valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Workload Automation writes "With an easy setup phase in place, agent-based installation can be done in minutes". AppWorx Workload Automation is most compared with Automic Workload Automation, Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Automic Automation Intelligence and Stonebranch, whereas IBM Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, HCL Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Automic Workload Automation. See our AppWorx Workload Automation vs. IBM Workload Automation report.

    See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.