We performed a comparison between Appian and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Process Mining."Low code development: Code can be developed pretty quickly which leads to less turnaround time for automation of business processes."
"Process Modeling enables creation of business process workflows. You can create complex business workflows in a visual manner, and it is also easy to debug/monitor."
"Call Web Service Smart Service - Web service integrations with other systems are super simple and fast to create, supported by low code menus."
"In terms of interface, it's very good. In terms of infrastructure, it's amazing and already using multiple tools behind the scenes. It's a low-code platform, so it's very easy to implement."
"Form building capabilities and well thought out process modelling are key points to this product."
"The agile manner that we require to create our workflows. This is probably the most critical part of our solution and the time it takes to start processing the solution."
"The most valuable features are the low coding and low code data."
"Appian is easy to install and set up, and it does not come out with your audit. It has accessible process orchestration and process management. With Appian, the time to market is much faster."
"Installation using the cloud solution is a seamless integration with virtually no installation time involved."
"You can build flows with this product."
"My experience with scalability was good."
"It's an extensive solution."
"This solution is very easy to use and implement as you are able to partner with a cloud enterprise and be on your way."
"I have never had issues with online technical support."
"The automation has proven to be immensely valuable as we now have a running bot handling everything."
"UiPath's human-in-the-loop features are helpful."
"The UI of Appian is more internal. Recently, there has been an addition of an external user portal for the customer-facing stuff. It's still coming out."
"Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built."
"A point of improvement would be the SAIL forms. The built-in tool used to generate forms does not have debugging support (to view local variables as they change on live preview, and step-by-step valuation) which is a big drawback for form development. Moreover, the script language used to build SAIL forms does not support inheritance or lambda expressions (functions as arguments of other functions), which makes the code base more verbose."
"The solution could improve robotic process automation."
"It would be nice if you could create your own customized apps when the business needed them."
"I would like to see more complete university tools. For example, with UiPath, I have had a good experience related to a free course in order to provide some users some different levels of knowledge. This extra training helps users not only use the solution but to develop further within the tool."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"The ability of the interface to load automatic data is not great."
"UiPath Process Mining could improve by limiting the number of updates."
"We encountered difficulties when trying to integrate UiPath Process Mining with SAP."
"Process mining is something that we are doing, but I think it needs to be more mature. UiPath is still new to process mining. They are decent in SAP ERP when it comes to process mining. But compared to Oracle's E-Business Suite and all, they are still pretty new."
"It is stable, but not the top of the curve. It can be improved, let's put it that way."
"It can be difficult to handle the first project until you understand the product a bit better."
"The configurations on the ERP platforms could be improved."
"It would be nice if UiPath's Document Understanding feature supported more languages. I don't think it supports Chinese or Japanese. We have been working in the Asia-Pacific region for a long time, and this prevents us from recommending the solution to some customers."
"UiPath Process Mining is not easy for everyday users."
Appian is ranked 5th in Process Mining with 58 reviews while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ, Minit and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
