Appian and Camunda compete in the process automation category. Appian appears to have the edge with a comprehensive low-code platform facilitating rapid development and integration, whereas Camunda's open-source flexibility can attract developers looking for cost-effective options.
Features:Appian's strengths include a robust low-code platform for quick application development, seamless process modeling, and strong case management. It enables rapid deployment with tools like SAIL for interface creation and BPMN 2.0 compatibility. Camunda offers a lightweight BPMN engine, exceptional standards compliance, and adaptability with microservices, making it ideal for organizations favoring an open-source environment.
Room for Improvement:Appian could enhance its interface customization and improve mobile capabilities. Challenges exist in scaling and integrating with broader tools and DevOps. Camunda can improve its user interface for ease of use, streamline performance under heavy loads, and focus on complex process modeling and documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Appian provides cloud and on-premises deployment options and generally excellent technical support, though the support can be stretched due to demand. Camunda supports diverse environments but has a more technical setup requiring skilled resources. Its customer support is responsive but sometimes reliant on open-source community contributions.
Pricing and ROI:Appian positions its pricing at a premium level, balanced by a rich feature set and potential for high ROI from digital transformation capabilities. Camunda offers a cost-effective open-source solution, appealing for those prioritizing lower initial investment, with additional expenses for enterprise features. ROI for both products depends on the complexity and scale of implementation.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
Appian is very efficient, allowing us to build a lot of applications within a financial year, making it cost-effective.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support is generally good.
AWS provides the best support, followed by Microsoft, and then Google.
They provide better support for the enterprise edition.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
Appian is scalable, but it depends on how you build your applications.
Camunda offers a high level of scalability, especially when using its SaaS model, which manages and scales implementations automatically.
It allows for easy scaling, especially with ECS service configurations.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
There haven't been any significant outages in my experience with Camunda.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
I would like to see more enhancement in the user interface to allow more freedom in designing the sites and pages.
If there is a very complex process that includes a lot of data transitioning and memory-centric processes, it consumes a lot of memory.
There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible.
More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
The price of Appian, on a competitive landscape, is a little bit on the higher side for companies, rating maybe a 6.5.
AWS pricing is very competitive compared to Azure and cheap compared to Google.
There is a licensing cost for using the SaaS model and Enterprise edition of Camunda.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Appian also utilizes AI for business users, providing a feature called process each view, enabling business users to create their own dashboards, reports, and gain insights from their data and processes using artificial intelligence.
I can create tables, perform database-related activities, and create multiple tables.
EC2 makes scaling horizontally incredibly easy, especially when working under the ECS service.
The biggest difference between Camunda and Bonita might be that Camunda is simpler and more flexible for setting.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Camunda | 16.5% |
Appian | 5.3% |
Other | 78.2% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 20 |
Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
Large Enterprise | 41 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 41 |
Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
Large Enterprise | 29 |
Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:
Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.
Appian Features
Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:
Appian Benefits
The benefits of using Appian include:
Reviews from Real Users
A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.
Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.
Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.
Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.
What are Camunda's key features?In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.