We performed a comparison between Appian and BIC Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."SAIL (Self-Assembling Interface Layer), a scripting language provided by Appian. It is the equivalent of JS and CSS. It allows creation of complex UIs which are also responsive. With SAIL, we have a single language for both the UI logic and its appearance. UI components can be built as reusable components and used in multiple UI interfaces."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The Application Designer is very user friendly. There are also lot of plug-ins that you can use and, for the most part, they are free."
"The low code functionality and being able to get applications faster to customers or to the market are valuable."
"What stands out are the speed of the product, the quick, easy development, and visual diagramming."
"Technical support is quite responsive."
"Process culture is making noise inside the organization because now, everybody knows that their time is being monitored."
"Technical support is helpful."
"The central dictionary is a valuable feature."
"This is low-cost and very user friendly. A variety of models are available depending on the needs of the customer."
"The product is easy to use."
"While this is a new product it has a mature feel from being built by a company with many years in the business."
"If we could calculate the amount of data that will be realized, it would help us a lot."
"Architecture of product and scalabiility issues."
"Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built."
"My only request is that they decrease the license costs."
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"The tool itself is pretty good, but the main area that we struggled with was the backend. The frontend development is really good, but the backend modeling can be streamlined a little bit. There are good integrations, but tying them through the data layer and then up into the frontend could be improved a little bit. It does read/write on the data source, and you can configure it to just write or just read, but there is a little bit of work involved."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"The graphical user interface could be easier to use. It should be simplified."
"The product needs improvement regarding the confidentiality of the domain information for the key administrator."
"There's an issue with the current manual that they're working on."
"As the product is very new, some minor features are still missing, but everything is there to handle day-to-day process modeling."
"The solution could improve its connectivity to other systems."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 56 reviews while BIC Platform is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while BIC Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BIC Platform writes "Provides good stability, but they should add a feature for enterprise architecture". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas BIC Platform is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ARIS BPA, Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and ADONIS.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.