Appgate SDP vs Nutanix Flow Network Security comparison

Appgate and Nutanix are both solutions in the Microsegmentation Software category. Appgate is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Nutanix is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Appgate holds a 3.3% mindshare in MS, compared to Nutanix’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Appgate users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Appgate SDP

Read 8 Appgate SDP reviews

6,104 Views
427 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nutanix Flow Network Security

Read 11 Nutanix Flow Network Security reviews

2,051 Views
1,928 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Appgate SDP

Nutanix Flow Network Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Appgate SDP and Nutanix Flow Network Security compete in the network security domain. Appgate SDP has an edge in pricing and support, whereas Nutanix Flow Network Security offers a broader feature set, making it a compelling option at a higher cost.

Features: Appgate SDP includes dynamic secure access controls, granular policy enforcement, and flexible security policies. Nutanix Flow Network Security focuses on simplified microsegmentation, enhanced visibility across workloads, and comprehensive threat protection.

Room for Improvement: Appgate SDP could benefit from streamlined integration capabilities, expanded threat protection features, and enhanced workload visibility. Nutanix Flow Network Security might improve with a more intuitive initial setup, increased flexibility in security policies, and better deployment consistency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appgate SDP offers an intuitive deployment process and responsive customer support, catering to dynamic cloud environments. Nutanix Flow Network Security ensures deployment consistency across integrated platforms but may present more complexity during initial setup.

Pricing and ROI: Appgate SDP provides competitive pricing and a lower initial setup cost, leading to faster ROI. Nutanix Flow Network Security has higher upfront costs but justifies the price with its extensive feature set and strategic long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Appgate SDP vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Appgate SDP vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Appgate SDP

Ranking in Microsegmentation Software

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

ZTNA as a Service (17th), ZTNA (8th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (17th)

Nutanix Flow Network Security

Ranking in Microsegmentation Software

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Microsegmentation Software category, the mindshare of Appgate SDP is 3.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Flow Network Security is 6.8%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Microsegmentation Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nutanix Flow Network Security	6.8%
Appgate SDP	3.3%
Other	89.9%

Microsegmentation Software

Featured Reviews

Joseph Koomson

Ip Network Security Specialist at MTN Ghana

Zero trust access has strengthened remote connectivity and secures diverse office devices

Appgate SDP support is always available to assist, which is the primary strength. However, there are areas for improvement. When a user is unable to connect, the platform should display detailed information such as the user's IP address, MAC address, and specific reasons for connection failure. Currently, aside from invalid username and password errors, Appgate SDP provides generic errors related to policy, such as a policy admin error. The system should provide deeper diagnostics to explain why a user cannot connect. The dashboard could also be enhanced with additional features and logins to provide better visibility. Sometimes there is no immediate clarity about what is happening. After using Appgate SDP for a long time and experiencing various errors, we have learned where to investigate, but this would be problematic for new users trying to resolve issues. The dashboard could display user connection times, failure reasons, and other relevant information. The user activity logs and accounting features should be improved in particular.

Read full review

Vishnu Mohan

Service Delivery Manager Cloud And Datacenter Operations at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud-style segmentation has improved hybrid security but integration with on-prem tags still needs work

I would like to see better micro-segmentation capabilities in Nutanix Flow Network Security. It has to work with our Cisco on-premises tooling. We use something called tagging on-premises, so if the same tags could be used in Nutanix Flow Network Security, then that would make life easier. The Cisco part was a challenge in terms of how it integrates with third-party vendors and tools, so we have kept it for the next release.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most important features is stopping lateral movement across our network."

"Previously, with AnyConnect, we experienced frequent issues, and in comparison to that solution, we have seen significant improvement and minimum downtime."

"Appgate SDP is the best solution for micro-segmentation and supplying VPN solutions."

"Appgate SDP has positively impacted my organization, as we are using it to securely access the internet after the cyber attack."

"The interface is really friendly. It's simple to understand."

"It is pretty stable."

"The flexibility of the tool is valuable; it is very robust, has a very robust configuration capability, is pretty well documented, and is also good interface-wise."

"The simplicity of the SDP platform is a standout feature; instead of navigating through intricate details, users can seamlessly connect to the company's network or switch to the internet with minimal effort."

More Appgate SDP pros

"Flow Network Security's most valuable features are user-friendliness, the console, and policy creation."

"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Nutanix Flow Network Security is a simple solution that is usable, easy to understand, and easy to deploy."

"What I like about Nutanix Flow Network Security is that it features cloud-like segmentation, which is available in a hybrid environment for us."

"When comparing the costs of Nutanix Flow versus managing multiple VLANs and many other firewalls, it is far less expensive."

"Nutanix Flow is straightforward to install. You only need to select a checkmark that you want to enable Nutanix Flow."

"The network view was excellent as it allowed us to expand the server view and visualize all connections it made within the environment. This was particularly useful in identifying the path of our data and not just its location within the data center."

"Nutanix Flow has a lot of data protection features. It's also valuable for operations and management. It's a big solution that works well with different solutions and is suitable for most business cases."

More Nutanix Flow Network Security pros

Cons

"When a user is unable to connect, the platform should display detailed information such as the user's IP address, MAC address, and specific reasons for connection failure."

"It would be better to connect to an application portal from any device. Documentation and support could be better."

"One thing that kind of sticks out to me is the ability to do a proper non-split tunnel."

"If I could change or improve anything about Appgate SDP, it would be to enhance the user experience by improving the UI so that it is more explanatory."

"One limitation is that it's harder to provide access to multiple applications in the company with Appgate, but that's probably because of poor management."

"The user interface should be improved as it is not very easy to work with the updates."

"On the cloud, when you make some changes, it may be difficult."

"One thing that kind of sticks out to me is the ability to do a proper non-split tunnel. VPN tunnel-wise, it is not really a true unsplit tunnel, but I think that's just because of the way it's designed. A split VPN basically allows your system to talk to other systems without being forced down the tunnel. A VPN running in a non-split tunnel mode forces all the traffic down the tunnel to wherever you're VPNing to. It forces the traffic down so that the traffic is subject to the firewall and rules that you have in your corporate environment and such. It helps to prevent remote malicious folks that may be talking directly to that box from piggybacking into the corporate environment through it. They do it partially, but it would be nice to see more of an enterprise-level solution there."

More Appgate SDP cons

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"For customers who are running Nutanix Flow and AHV, the largest area for improvement is in the disaster recovery environments. To automate the populate of rules from one side to the other side in case of disaster you report everything on the disaster recovery site, and you have all the rules automatically applied. This was something that was being built when I left Nutanix. It might already be available. Additionally, the usability of the rules editor could improve."

"The most difficult part is the configuration of the initial blueprints."

"Nutanix Flow Network Security needs to improve threat hunting, compliance, and policy optimization - these things that security officers would use."

"For customers who are running Nutanix Flow and AHV, the largest area for improvement is in the disaster recovery environments."

"Nutanix Flow's networking features could use some improvement. Also, I don't know if it's currently supporting load balancing or not."

"While the graphical interface of Nutanix Flow Network Security could have been improved, and some of the reporting features needed extra work, the product's features were similar to VMware's NSX. The difference lay more in the presentation and user interface."

"I would like to see better micro-segmentation capabilities in Nutanix Flow Network Security."

More Nutanix Flow Network Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a pretty expensive tool. It is maybe about $20,000 per year for a hundred users or so."

"We pay $100 per user per month. One license for the site is around $17."

"The pricing is according to the market price. It is not a very cheap solution. They have some very aggressive promotions to sell the product in the market."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"This model is very accessible to implement."

"There is an annual subscription to use this solution. There is a 60-day trial to use the solution, it gives you time to decide if you want to continue using the solution."

"The product is available for free use."

"Flow Network Security is available on a three-year license, with annual renewals of the maintenance fee."

"There are different licensing models."

"In comparison to other options available in the market, I would rate their pricing as very competitive, probably a two or three out of ten for cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsegmentation Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Government

Healthcare Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Appgate SDP?

Regarding pricing and setup cost, everything is already pre-installed in my organization, so I am not sure about pricing details, as the other team handles it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Appgate SDP?

The reporting can be improved, as Appgate SDP is strong but could benefit from enhanced reporting features. This would improve visibility and simplify operational monitoring, along with simpler ini...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Appgate SDP?

I work as a Cloud Operations Engineer at PowerSchool India Private Limited, and I have been using Appgate SDP for about four years. My company has nine sites where we use Appgate SDP before logging...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Flow?

There are different models like Nutanix AOS Pro or Ultimate license. The prices are different, but it's not in the same price range as Cisco ACI, for example.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Flow?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nutanix Flow?

I cannot think of any weak sides, drawbacks, or something to improve. We have not implemented the impact on Nutanix Flow Network Security's zero-trust security model on our threat control processes...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Appgate SDP

Compared 8% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Appgate SDP

Compared 6% of the time

Twingate vs Appgate SDP

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Appgate SDP

Compared 4% of the time

Cyolo vs Appgate SDP

Compared 4% of the time

More Appgate SDP Competitors

VMware NSX vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 53% of the time

Illumio Segmentation vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Secure Workload vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 9% of the time

Hillstone CloudHive vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 6% of the time

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Nutanix Flow Network Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

July 2026

Download Appgate SDP product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Flow Network Security

August 2026

Download Nutanix Flow Network Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

Nutanix Flow Microsegmentation

Overview

Appgate SDP provides a comprehensive approach to network access control, optimizing security with robust configurations and a user-friendly interface, featuring flexible deployment and server concealment to mitigate risks.

Appgate SDP has been designed to enhance security operations through reliable access management. It prides itself on offering strong documentation, substantial scalability, and an interface that supports easy deployment, creating a seamless experience for local and remote connections. It enables organizations to implement micro-segmentation and integrate multifactor authentication, thus elevating their security posture. Recent updates reflect improvements, yet aspects like cost, cloud modification difficulties, VPN customization needs, and an upgraded interface remain areas for future enhancement. Ideal for hybrid environments, Appgate SDP aids transitions from traditional VPNs, protecting digital assets and preventing lateral network threats.

What are the key features of Appgate SDP?

Robust Configuration: Allows flexible setups to meet specific requirements.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies deployment, enhancing user experience.
Server Concealment: Minimizes exposure to threats by hiding servers.
Scalability: Accommodates growing organizational needs with stable performance.
Access Rule Granularity: Provides detailed options for managing network access.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Security Enhancement: Improved protection against lateral movement and ransomware.
Deployment Ease: Streamlined processes for faster implementation.
Strong Support: Reliable assistance from the vendor ensures sustained use.
Remote Work Optimization: Facilitates safe remote access, vital for modern work environments.

Appgate SDP is prevalent in industries shifting from traditional VPNs to more secure architectures. It supports enterprises embracing cloud technologies by providing reliable network access solutions, especially in hybrid work settings, ensuring the security of digital assets while accommodating multifactor authentication and micro-segmentation strategies.

Appgate

Nutanix Flow Network Security offers advanced network protection through virtual networking and micro-segmentation, supporting zero-trust principles for secure communication among virtual machines and applications while being compatible with Nutanix solutions.

Featuring an intuitive console, Nutanix Flow Network Security simplifies operations and enhances visibility. It integrates with Nutanix solutions, facilitating seamless compatibility. The inclusion of virtual networking and micro-segmentation aids in data management by improving network visualization and virtual machine segregation. Supporting zero-trust principles, the security system efficiently manages isolated communication and secure deployment. With robust connectivity through fiber links and VPCs, it ensures reliable performance across networks, making it accessible to businesses with diverse requirements.

What are the key features of Nutanix Flow Network Security?

Virtual Networking: Provides seamless integration for secure data transmission.
Micro-Segmentation: Enhances security by segmenting traffic within networks.
API Control: Allows streamlined management of network operations through APIs.
Network Performance Analysis: Offers insights into network health and efficiency.
User-Friendly Console: Simplifies policy creation and improves network visibility.

What benefits can be expected when evaluating Nutanix Flow Network Security?

Enhanced Security: Facilitates zero-trust policies and isolated VM communication.
Improved Data Management: Aids in the segregation and visualization of virtual machines.
Operational Efficiency: Simplifies complex networking tasks for faster deployment.
Compatibility: Integrates smoothly with Nutanix solutions, enhancing overall functionality.
Connectivity: Ensures secure and reliable connectivity with fiber links and VPCs.

In industries such as IT and financial services, Nutanix Flow Network Security is commonly used for disaster recovery planning and enhancing micro-segmentation. It ensures secure, isolated communication within virtual environments and helps manage traffic visibility. By facilitating the creation of non-routed virtual private clouds and blocking unauthorized access between VMs, organizations leverage its capabilities for better network communication control across data centers.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

United States Air Force FINRA Weight Watchers Rackspace DataDog SageNet Verdant Norwegian Cruise Line VoiceBase The Third Floor

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, Volkswagen SAIC, Brighton and Hove City Council, Foresters Financial, Janus International Group, Cloud Comrade, Serco

Buyer's Guide

Appgate SDP vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security

August 2026

Free Report: Appgate SDP vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Appgate SDP vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Appgate SDP vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security report.

See our list of best Microsegmentation Software vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Microsegmentation Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.