Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Nutanix Flow Network Security comparison

Akamai and Nutanix are both solutions in the Microsegmentation Software category. Akamai is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Nutanix is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.7. Akamai holds a 26.6% mindshare in MS, compared to Nutanix’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Read 18 Akamai Guardicore Segmentation reviews

7,980 Views
5,187 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Nutanix Flow Network Security

Read 10 Nutanix Flow Network Security reviews

1,576 Views
1,497 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Nutanix Flow Network Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and Nutanix Flow Network Security both focus on network security with different methods. Akamai holds an edge in micro-segmentation and visibility, while Nutanix excels in user-friendly virtual networking.

Features: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation specializes in micro-segmentation, fast policy application, and high visibility. It integrates well with different network settings and supports a wide array of operating systems. Nutanix Flow Network Security is known for its simple deployment and management, quality APIs, and solid micro-segmentation in a virtual framework.

Room for Improvement: Akamai users call for lower licensing costs and better integration with additional tools, plus more flexible dashboards and improved automation. Nutanix Flow could enhance networking features and disaster recovery integration. Both need advancements in customization and management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation supports diverse environments including public and hybrid clouds and is praised for excellent technical support. Nutanix Flow offers consistency, mainly for on-premises and public clouds, but needs to improve its support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai Guardicore is seen as expensive but offers protective features that clients value positively in terms of ROI. Nutanix Flow is competitively priced with clear subscription plans, though more pricing tiers for various customer sizes are desired. Akamai shows significant ROI with data protection and lower resource demands, while Nutanix offers affordability without missing crucial features.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Ranking in Microsegmentation Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud and Data Center Security (1st), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (12th), Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (6th)

Nutanix Flow Network Security

Ranking in Microsegmentation Software

5th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Microsegmentation Software category, the mindshare of Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is 26.6%, up from 26.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Flow Network Security is 5.6%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Microsegmentation Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation	26.6%
Nutanix Flow Network Security	5.6%
Other	67.8%

Microsegmentation Software

Featured Reviews

Uday Varma

Solution Architecht at Inspira Enterprise

Offers granular control and ease of policy creation with features like telemetry and micro-segmentation but incident tagging is missing

Our customers use the solution for micro-segmentation within the data center or cloud environments. One customer uses it for their on-premises infrastructure, deployed at the code level across their massive network. Another customer uses it in a data center to monitor microsegmentation for their 500-node workload. Moreover, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation has helped our customers manage and secure traffic between different applications or workloads. Earlier, they were using VMware NSX-v, which offered good logging for distributed services on an analytical level. However, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation provides them with better overall visibility and granular control over-segmentation, even for inter-application and inter-routing traffic.

Read full review

MohammadJundiah

Solutions Architect at Logicom Sales Inc

Has enabled consistent enforcement of zero-trust policies at the virtual layer

The micro-segmentation feature helps to manage network security effectively because it helps the virtual machines that are already on the cluster and the applications inside the cluster itself. It protects them and helps them communicate with each other without needing a complex external or internal firewall in this use case. Working with the zero-trust security model means never trust but always verify. Every VM, application, and service in your environment must explicitly prove it's allowed to communicate with others. An application would be able to talk to a VM and vice versa. This zero-trust means explicitly proving that they are allowed to talk to each other, with no implicit trust just because they are on the same VLAN, subnet, cluster, or environment. Nutanix Flow brings the zero-trust model natively to the virtual layer inside the Nutanix software itself, the AHV. The AHV software enforces strict communication rules between workloads. Integration between Nutanix Flow and other products natively benefits the infrastructure itself as this is a networking segmentation software coming from Nutanix itself. This provides ultimate compatibility. There is no need for extra firewall VMs such as Palo Alto or third-party switches. Security becomes established at the hypervisor level, which creates a new conglomeration of security segmentation. The network performance analysis that Nutanix Flow Network Security provides is very beneficial and effective.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The real bonus is the fact that we can secure applications, all the way down to the individual services, on each host. It's actually more granular security than we can get out of a traditional firewall."

"I found the solution to be stable."

"The tool is a complete package that offers many features like visibility. You can get a graph with real-time workflows and visibility into server-to-server communication. We get visibility into many things happening within our environment."

"This tool greatly helps in understanding the footprint of the attacks."

"The solution is very scalable, especially when connected to the cloud resources."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its visibility."

"Application Ring-Fencing and Deception Server, which is basically like a honeypot, are pretty useful features."

"The label-based segmentation is the most valuable feature."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation pros

"Nutanix Flow is straightforward to install. You only need to select a checkmark that you want to enable Nutanix Flow."

"Flow Network Security's most valuable features are user-friendliness, the console, and policy creation."

"We appreciate the fact that this solution allows us to segregate two virtual machines that are in the same cluster."

"The micro-segmentation feature helps to manage network security effectively because it helps the virtual machines that are already on the cluster and the applications inside the cluster itself, protects them and helps them communicate with each other without needing a complex external or internal firewall in this use case."

"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Nutanix Flow has a lot of data protection features. It's also valuable for operations and management. It's a big solution that works well with different solutions and is suitable for most business cases."

"It allows for policies that enable complete visibility and traffic control."

"They also introduced that they develop API first and the rest follows."

More Nutanix Flow Network Security pros

Cons

"Incident tagging could be improved. Other vendors offer semi-automatic tagging, which Guardicore doesn't yet have."

"Clients would like to see that the security policies of GuardiCore can continue to be comparable to all the major firewall players out there."

"Customers would want to see the cost improved."

"Guardicore Centra should incorporate automation so that we don't require to write custom scripts and APIs. The tool also has limitations on rules where it allows only sixty thousand rules. Our clients have also commented that there are too many manual clicks and effort to do changes. I think that the incorporation of automation can help our clients make changes with confidence and without the possibility of human error."

"I would rate the stability a six out of ten, where one is low and ten is high stability."

"The dashboard needs improvement. It should be more flexible so that I can easily see what I want or need to see."

"In our version, when using the terminal server, we cannot exclude user tasks for each session."

"It doesn't support a PAAC solution (Platforma as a service) in the cloud."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation cons

"The documentation offered by the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"We would like the reporting functionality of this solution to be improved."

"The most difficult part is the configuration of the initial blueprints."

"While the graphical interface of Nutanix Flow Network Security could have been improved, and some of the reporting features needed extra work, the product's features were similar to VMware's NSX. The difference lay more in the presentation and user interface."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"For customers who are running Nutanix Flow and AHV, the largest area for improvement is in the disaster recovery environments. To automate the populate of rules from one side to the other side in case of disaster you report everything on the disaster recovery site, and you have all the rules automatically applied. This was something that was being built when I left Nutanix. It might already be available. Additionally, the usability of the rules editor could improve."

"Nutanix Flow's networking features could use some improvement. Also, I don't know if it's currently supporting load balancing or not."

"I would rate Flow Network Security's stability seven out of ten - it could be improved."

More Nutanix Flow Network Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Guardicore Centra provides better value for money than NSX, was the other solution that we looked at, which was too expensive for what it does."

"Compared to the pricing we were seeing from both Illumio and Edgewise, Guardicore was very competitive."

"This is not a cheap solution but you have to consider the bigger picture, which is what it is giving you."

"The solution is reasonably priced and I would rate it a six out of ten. The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"GuardiCore has made some new changes to the license now. We've seen monthly and annual licenses based on a subscription. We have a few clients that pay anywhere from $25,000 a year."

"The price is the same as other products in the market. There's no price argument to choose one or the other product, it will cost the customer approximately the same."

"Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is expensive."

"The customer would complain about the cost."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation pricing and cost advice

"In comparison to other options available in the market, I would rate their pricing as very competitive, probably a two or three out of ten for cost."

"This model is very accessible to implement."

"There is an annual subscription to use this solution. There is a 60-day trial to use the solution, it gives you time to decide if you want to continue using the solution."

"There are different licensing models."

"Flow Network Security is available on a three-year license, with annual renewals of the maintenance fee."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The product is available for free use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsegmentation Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Healthcare Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Guardicore Centra?

I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. I know other micro-segmentation tools like Cisco or Illumio, and so I think they are in the middle.

See all answers

What do you like most about Guardicore Infection Monkey?

Initially, I liked the telemetry part. But later, we used the microsegmentation features that we were able to deploy and found that they really stood out from other vendors. It allows us to see mi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Guardicore Infection Monkey?

When we have more than one interface, we can only have one policy for both interfaces. Normally, you have assets with a production interface and a server interface that are only for management. But...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nutanix Flow?

Nutanix Flow Network Security is a simple solution that is usable, easy to understand, and easy to deploy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Flow?

There are different models like Nutanix AOS Pro or Ultimate license. The prices are different, but it's not in the same price range as Cisco ACI, for example.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Flow?

Nutanix Flow Network Security needs to improve threat hunting, compliance, and policy optimization - these things that security officers would use. Making these aspects clearer would enable easier ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Illumio vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 44% of the time

VMware NSX vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Secure Workload vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 9% of the time

Zero Networks vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 4% of the time

Wiz vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 2% of the time

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Competitors

VMware NSX vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 72% of the time

Illumio vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Secure Workload vs Nutanix Flow Network Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Nutanix Flow Network Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

October 2025

Download Akamai Guardicore Segmentation product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Flow Network Security

October 2025

Download Nutanix Flow Network Security product report

Also Known As

Guardicore Centra, GuardiCore

Nutanix Flow Microsegmentation

Overview

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is a software-based microsegmentation solution that provides the simplest, fastest, and most intuitive way to enforce Zero Trust principles. It enables you to prevent malicious lateral movement in your network through precise segmentation policies, visuals of activity within your IT environment, and network security alerts. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation works across your data centers, multicloud environments, and endpoints. It is faster to deploy than infrastructure segmentation approaches and provides you with unparalleled visibility and control of your network.

Akamai

Flow Network Security is a stateful, distributed, microsegmentation firewall. It is provided as part of NCI Ultimate or as part of the optional Security Add-On package for NCI Pro.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Santander, Frontier Airlines, OpenLink, Intermountain Healthcare, Cellcom, BancoBASE

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, Volkswagen SAIC, Brighton and Hove City Council, Foresters Financial, Janus International Group, Cloud Comrade, Serco

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security

September 2025

Free Report: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Nutanix Flow Network Security report.

See our list of best Microsegmentation Software vendors.

We monitor all Microsegmentation Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.