Apiiro vs FOSSA comparison

Apiiro and FOSSA are both solutions in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category. Apiiro is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while FOSSA is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Apiiro holds a 1.9% mindshare in SCA, compared to FOSSA’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apiiro users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of FOSSA users who would recommend it.

Apiiro

Read 3 Apiiro reviews

1,576 Views
820 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FOSSA

Read 15 FOSSA reviews

1,548 Views
1,486 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Apiiro

FOSSA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

FOSSA and Apiiro compete in the software security and risk management category. Apiiro seems to have the upper hand due to its superior adaptability and focus on risk assessment features, despite FOSSA's advantageous pricing and support.

Features: FOSSA provides compliance tracking, open-source management, and seamless integration with development environments. Apiiro focuses on risk assessment, security vulnerability identification, and advanced risk management tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FOSSA deployment is straightforward with minimal setup, and its customer service is responsive and knowledgeable. Apiiro has a more complex deployment process but offers extensive support resources, ensuring a smooth integration despite initial complexity.

Pricing and ROI: FOSSA offers a cost-effective setup with flexible pricing suitable for projects focusing on compliance. Apiiro is more costly upfront but provides a higher ROI with deep security insights and risk management capabilities appealing to enterprises prioritizing robust security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiiro vs. FOSSA Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. FOSSA

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiiro

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), API Security (12th), Software Supply Chain Security (8th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (13th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (6th)

FOSSA

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of Apiiro is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FOSSA is 3.1%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
FOSSA	3.1%
Apiiro	1.9%
Other	95.0%

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

Hanumanth Ramsetty

Software Engineer at Tech Mahindra Limited

Proactively mitigate deployment vulnerabilities with seamless dependency tracking

Before using FOSSA, we could only identify issues after deployment in the Cloud Run. Now, with FOSSA, we identify dependency issues or vulnerabilities during the CI phase itself. This proactive approach has eliminated the need to search the internet for solutions, as FOSSA provides updated recommendations automatically. This has made the process more efficient and mitigated risks before deployment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"Policies and identification of open-source licensing issues are the most valuable features. It reduces the time needed to identify open-source software licensing issues."

"FOSSA suggests solutions for dependency mismatches."

"One of the things that I really like about FOSSA is that it allows you to go very granular. For example, if there's a package that's been flagged because it's subject to a license that may be conflicts with or raises a concern with one of the policies that I've set, then FOSSA enables you to go really granular into that package to see which aspects of the package are subject to which licenses. We can ultimately determine with our engineering teams if we really need this part of the package or not. If it's raising this flag, we can make really actionable decisions at a very micro level to enable the build to keep pushing forward."

"FOSSA provided us with contextualized, easily actionable intelligence that alerted us to compliance issues. I could tell FOSSA exactly what I cared about and they would tell me when something was out of policy. I don't want to hear from the compliance tool unless I have an issue that I need to deal with. That was what was great about FOSSA is that it was basically "Here's my policy and only send me an alert if there's something without a policy." I thought that it was really good at doing that."

"FOSSA allows us to keep track of all dependencies to ensure they are up to date and not causing any vulnerabilities."

"I am impressed with the tool’s seamless integration and quick results."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to identify all of the components in a build, and then surface the licenses that are associated with it, allowing us to make a decision as to whether or not we allow a team to use the components. That eliminates the risk that comes with running consumer software that contains open source components."

"Their CLI tool is very efficient. It does not send your source code over to their servers. It just does fingerprinting. It is also very easy to integrate into software development practices."

More FOSSA pros

Cons

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"User management is a little bit clunky."

"On the legal and policy sides, there is some room for improvement. I know that our legal team has raised complaints about having to approve the same dependency multiple times, as opposed to having them it across the entire organization."

"For open-source management, FOSSA's out-of-the-box policy engine is easy to use, but the list of licenses is not as complete as we would like it to be. They should add more open-source licenses to the selection."

"Security scanning is an area for improvement. At this point, our experience is that we're only scanning for license information in components, and we're not scanning for security vulnerability information. We don't have access to that data. We use other tools for that. It would be an improvement for us to use one tool instead of two, so that we just have to go through one process instead of two."

"On the dashboard, there should be an option to increase the column width so that we can see the complete name of the GitHub repository. Currently, on the dashboard, we see the list of projects, but to see the complete name, you have to hover your mouse over an item, which is annoying."

"While running a FOSSA scan, it takes time for the results to reflect in the FOSSA UI portal."

"The solution provides contextualized, actionable, intelligence that alerts us to compliance issues, but there is still a little bit of work to be done on it. One of the issues that I have raised with FOSSA is that when it identifies an issue that is an error, why is it in error? What detail can they give to me? They've improved, but that still needs some work. They could provide more information that helps me to identify the dependencies and then figure out where they originated from."

"If you have thousands of applications, organizing them all into teams or tags is challenging."

"I wish there was a way that you could have a more global rollout of it, instead of having to do it in each repository individually. It's possible, that's something that is offered now, or maybe if you were using the CI Jenkins, you'd be able to do that. But with Travis, there wasn't an easy way to do that. At least not that I could find. That was probably the biggest issue."

More FOSSA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"FOSSA is not cheap, but their offering is top-notch. It is very much a "you get what you pay for" scenario. Regardless of the price, I highly recommend FOSSA."

"Its price is reasonable as compared to the market. It is competitively priced in comparison to other similar solutions on the market. It is also quite affordable in terms of the value that it delivers as compared to its alternative of hiring a team."

"The solution's cost is a five out of ten."

"FOSSA is a fairly priced product. It is not either cheaper or expensive. The pricing lies somewhere in the middle. The solution is worth the money that we are spending to use it."

"The solution's pricing is good and reasonable because you can literally use a lot of it for free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apiiro?

Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apiiro?

My understanding is the pricing is pretty competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FOSSA?

The solution's pricing is good and reasonable because you can literally use a lot of it for free. You have to pay for the features you need, which I think is fair. If you want to get value for free...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FOSSA?

FOSSA does not show the exact line of code with vulnerabilities, which adds time to the process as we have to locate these manually. Some other tools like Check Point or SonarQube provide exact lin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FOSSA?

I have worked with FOSSA primarily to manage the dependencies in our projects. For example, if I take a Spring Boot application, FOSSA helps in identifying mismatches or unsupported dependencies th...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 22% of the time

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 18% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 15% of the time

Legit Security vs Apiiro

Compared 13% of the time

Wiz Code vs Apiiro

Compared 9% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Black Duck SCA vs FOSSA

Compared 39% of the time

Snyk vs FOSSA

Compared 19% of the time

Mend.io vs FOSSA

Compared 13% of the time

JFrog Xray vs FOSSA

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs FOSSA

Compared 5% of the time

More FOSSA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro

October 2025

Download Apiiro product report

Buyer's Guide

FOSSA

October 2025

Download FOSSA product report

Also Known As

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

No data available

Overview

Apiiro is the leader in application security posture management (ASPM), unifying risk visibility, prioritization, and remediation with deep code analysis and runtime context.

Companies like Morgan Stanley, SoFi, Rakuten, and Navan leverage Apiiro's ASPM to...

Get complete application and risk visibility: Apiiro takes a deep, code-based approach to ASPM. Its Cloud Application Security Platform analyzes source code and pulls in runtime context to build a continuous, graph-based inventory of application and software supply chain components.

Prioritize risks with code-to-runtime context: With its proprietary Risk Graph™️, Apiiro contextualizes security alerts from third-party tools and native security solutions based on the likelihood and impact of risk to uniquely minimize alert backlogs and triage time by 95%.

Fix and prevent risks that matter—faster: By tying risks to code owners, providing LLM-enriched remediation guidance, and embedding risk-based guardrails directly into developer tools and workflows, Apiiro improves remediation times (MTTR) by up to 85%.

Apiiro's native security solutions include API security testing in code, secrets detection and validation, software bill of materials (SBOM) generation, sensitive data exposure prevention, software composition analysis (SCA), and CI/CD and SCM security.

Apiiro

Up to 90% of any piece of software is from open source, creating countless dependencies and areas of risk to manage. FOSSA is the most reliable automated policy engine for legal teams to maintain license compliance, security to fix vulnerabilities, and engineering to improve code quality across the entire software supply chain. As the only developer-native open source management platform, FOSSA fully integrates with your existing CI/CD pipeline to provide complete visibility and context earlier in the software development lifecycle. For the first time, teams can collaboratively shift left and audit, analyze, control, and remediate license issues and vulnerabilities right in their existing workflows.

FOSSA

Sample Customers

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan

AppDyanmic, Uber, Twitter, Zendesk, Confluent

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. FOSSA

September 2025

Free Report: Apiiro vs. FOSSA

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiiro vs. FOSSA and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiiro vs. FOSSA report.

See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.