We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"The best part of Airflow is its direct support for Python, especially because Python is so important for data science, engineering, and design. This makes the programmatic aspect of our work easy for us, and it means we can automate a lot."
"The most valuable feature of Apache Airflow is creating and scheduling jobs. Additionally, the reattempt at failed jobs is useful."
"Apache Airflow's best feature is its flexibility."
"Designing processes and workflows is easier, and it assists in coordinating all of the different processes."
"The UI is very simple and easy to learn."
"Since the solution is programmatic, it allows users to define pipelines in code rather than drag and drop."
"The solution is flexible for all programming languages for all frameworks."
"Development is easy on the Ultimus platform."
"Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management has good integration with all the other tools we have been using in our company. We use the data that other tools provide in our implementation."
"Enhancements become necessary when scaling it up from a few thousand workflows to a more extensive scale of five thousand or ten thousand workflows."
"There is an area for improvement in onboarding new people. They should make it simple for newcomers. Else, we have to put a senior engineer to operate it."
"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."
"UI can be improved with additional user-friendly features for non-programmers and for fewer coding practitioner requirements."
"I have some issues with the solution's communication."
"We need to develop our workflow description and notations because out of the box, Apache Airflow does not provide some features that are needed."
"There is a need for more features on experimental evolution steps."
"Apache Airflow could be improved by integrating some versioning principles."
"Ultimus is not good at handling cash transactions. They should add a mobile application in the next release."
"We are looking for a feature that can resign and move the process from one step to another step."
More Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is ranked 52nd in Business Process Management (BPM). Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management writes "Integrates well and helpful support". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is most compared with Appian. See our Apache Airflow vs. Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.