No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AMD Vivado Design Suite vs New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AMD Vivado Design Suite
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
16th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
New Relic Solutions [Privat...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
494th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Alen Cherian - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Digital ASIC design engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Created complex video pipelines and now design reusable IP-based FPGA projects efficiently
The best features of AMD Vivado Design Suite is that it is a mature tool with a very good GUI. The most fascinating feature is its block design feature, which allows me to add and drop various IPs from AMD Vivado Design Suite's IP catalog and create a block design for my video designs. That is the one feature that I find very interesting. It is also very easy to source control AMD Vivado Design Suite projects using Git. The IP catalog is another valuable feature, and it is a very good tool that I install on all of my employees' project devices.
Dr. Abdullah Malik, PhD - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Vice President Head Of Solutions And Practices at LearningMate Private Limited
Monitoring has improved latency analysis and now supports precise root cause detection
I believe New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only] needs to work on AI anomaly detection and reduce false positive alerts through the context threshold. Regarding dependency visibility and root cause analysis, New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only] should be able to detect single points of failure and cascading failures instead of allowing users to perform tracing activity manually. This would be beneficial because maximum time goes into manual tracing activities. Additionally, New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only] should help us identify if there are thread pools and connection pools in performance optimization, as pool data visibility enables us to determine whether we need to increase the pool size or connection size.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If people are working on FPGA design, AMD Vivado Design Suite is the one go-to tool that I would recommend for everyone."
"AMD Vivado Design Suite has positively impacted my organization because it helped very well by having everything in one tool."
"Using AMD Vivado Design Suite has helped me personally be more productive and improve the quality of my work."
"The integrated logic analyzer, ILA, has been the biggest game-changer for my workflow."
"The best features of AMD Vivado Design Suite is that it is a mature tool with a very good GUI."
"What I appreciated most about my use case or the project is having the complete FPGA development workflow with AMD Vivado Design Suite."
"AMD Vivado Design Suite has positively impacted our organization because it is a great tool that makes jobs easier."
"AMD Vivado Design Suite has impacted my organization positively, as it was possible to implement projects that would not work otherwise."
"The biggest advantage of New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only] from an application performance issue identification point of view is that it helps us address application performance through the APM tool they provided."
"As a partner, the biggest advantage of New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only] is that it provides a much deeper dive analysis view and helps integrate various tools."
 

Cons

"AMD Vivado Design Suite could be improved with clearer error messages, more actionable suggestions for resolving timing violations, and a more responsive interface when working with large designs."
"I consider AMD Vivado Design Suite a very large and complex tool, yet it can be slower than other integration tools."
"Synthesis and implementation can take considerable time. When I experiment with many different configurations, the iteration cycle can become quite long."
"The design suite is very effective for its intended purpose, but it has many software bugs and is sometimes counter-intuitive, which makes the workflow worse."
"The graphical user interface for IP integration is a disaster and needs to be rewritten from scratch."
"The only disadvantage would be the CLI and UI not being on the same page, and I personally have run into a lot of issues on that aspect."
"I think the build times in certain projects are an area for improvement. When the design gets bigger, the build times to generate the bitstream can take hours."
"Do not directly go into AMD Vivado Design Suite because it can be very complex for first-time users; first, you should understand the basics such as digital design fundamentals and signals and systems."
"Support has potential for improvement to reduce the delays that occurred, depending on how the contract is structured with the customer."
"I believe New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only] needs to work on AI anomaly detection and reduce false positive alerts through the context threshold."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
30%
Educational Organization
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AMD Vivado Design Suite?
AMD Vivado Design Suite could be modernized so it does not function as a 1970s tool, particularly in the areas of technology mapping, placement, and routing where it could perform more intelligent ...
What is your primary use case for AMD Vivado Design Suite?
My main use case for AMD Vivado Design Suite is the design of FPGAs for educational purposes and also for solving contracting problems for interfacing chips. In a recent project, I used AMD Vivado ...
What advice do you have for others considering AMD Vivado Design Suite?
My advice to others looking into using AMD Vivado Design Suite is to avoid it if you can. I rate AMD Vivado Design Suite a three on a scale of one to ten because it is quite poor. It is not a total...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only]?
The cost of New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only], as compared to other products in parallel, is something I have always recommended. However, when it comes to price, there are other tools that ...
What needs improvement with New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only]?
I believe New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only] needs to work on AI anomaly detection and reduce false positive alerts through the context threshold. Regarding dependency visibility and root cau...
What is your primary use case for New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only]?
The main requirement for clients using New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only] is primarily application performance issues, root cause analysis, high latency, errors, and services failures. Someti...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about AMD Vivado Design Suite vs. New Relic Solutions [Private Offer Only] and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.