Amazon MSK vs Oracle Stream Analytics comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Streaming Analytics category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.3, while Oracle is ranked #28. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 6.5% mindshare in SA, compared to Oracle’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution.

Amazon MSK

Read 13 Amazon MSK reviews

3,035 Views
2,974 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Oracle Stream Analytics

187 Views
185 Comparison Views

Amazon MSK

Oracle Stream Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon MSK and Oracle Stream Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Streaming Analytics Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Streaming Analytics

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,829 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MSK

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

6th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Stream Analytics

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

28th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Amazon MSK is 6.5%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Stream Analytics is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Streaming Analytics

Featured Reviews

SYED SHAAZ

Co-Founder & CTO at Photios AI

Improved data streaming and integration challenges prompt search for alternatives

The integration capabilities of Amazon MSK are not very flexible. If you have your own self-managed Kafka, that helps significantly because you can set up configurations. We are considering self-managed Kafka since our product is only one year old. The Kafka integrations are fine, but the configurations are an issue. The only issue with Amazon MSK that we are facing is the configurations. There are preset configurations and limited configurations that we can set for our unique use case. The product could improve by allowing us to set different configurations. I would also like to see Amazon MSK improve in the area of connectors. We are considering Confluent Cloud because they have many more connectors. They have KSQL DB and governance features. It is slightly costlier, but Confluent offers more flexibility with their connectors.

Read full review

Use Oracle Stream Analytics?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MSK?

Amazon MSK has significantly improved our organization by building seamless integration between systems.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MSK?

I'm not sure exactly what benefit we have because we are using multiple AWS tools. We have AWS DMS, which is also the same as Amazon MSK, and we have Fivetran, which is a third-party website provid...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MSK?

We are currently using Amazon MSK to transfer data from our PostgreSQL database to our DynamoDB, acting as a mediator between those two databases for migration purposes. Our data is in an on-premis...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Azure Stream Analytics vs Amazon MSK

Compared 31% of the time

Confluent vs Amazon MSK

Compared 18% of the time

Apache Flink vs Amazon MSK

Compared 14% of the time

Google Cloud Dataflow vs Amazon MSK

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon MSK Competitors

Apache Flink vs Oracle Stream Analytics

Compared 56% of the time

More Oracle Stream Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MSK

August 2025

Download Amazon MSK product report

Buyer's Guide

Streaming Analytics

August 2025

Download Oracle Stream Analytics product report

Also Known As

Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka

No data available

Overview

Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK) is a fully managed service that enables you to build and run applications that use Apache Kafka to process streaming data. Amazon MSK provides the control-plane operations, such as those for creating, updating, and deleting clusters.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle Stream Analytics allows users to process and analyze large scale real-time information by using sophisticated correlation patterns, enrichment, and machine learning. It offers real-time actionable business insight on streaming data and automates action to drive today’s agile businesses.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.