Amazon MQ vs PubSub+ Platform comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Solace are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6, while Solace is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.5% mindshare in MQ, compared to Solace’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Solace users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 7 Amazon MQ reviews

920 Views
635 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

PubSub+ Platform

Read 17 PubSub+ Platform reviews

1,106 Views
610 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

PubSub+ Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Amazon MQ and PubSub+ Platform are competing messaging services in the realm of communication solutions. PubSub+ Platform has an edge due to its robust features and functionality, making it a preferred choice for enterprises that prioritize features over cost.

Features: Amazon MQ offers high availability, seamless integration with AWS, and comprehensive protocol support, making it a secure and scalable solution for reliable message brokering. PubSub+ Platform provides multi-cloud capabilities, dynamic message routing, and flexible protocol exchange, enhancing its applicability for complex needs across multiple platforms.

Room for Improvement: Amazon MQ could enhance its multi-cloud integration and expand protocol flexibility to compete with wider environments. Improvements in feature diversity and global accessibility would strengthen its offering. PubSub+ Platform could reduce complexity in its initial configuration and strive for more intuitive user interfaces. Lower cost of entry and simplified deployment processes would further broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon MQ benefits from AWS's comprehensive documentation, making setup straightforward for AWS users. Its managed nature requires minimal maintenance effort. PubSub+ Platform excels in providing a seamless configuration experience backed by responsive support, ensuring clear guidance for users across various environments.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon MQ operates on a pay-as-you-go model, offering potential cost savings ideal for small to mid-sized businesses. PubSub+ Platform, while higher in pricing, aligns with its extensive feature set, promising high ROI for enterprises that leverage its capabilities, justifying the investment for organizations prioritizing comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,469 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PubSub+ Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (2nd), Event Monitoring (13th), Streaming Analytics (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 3.5%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PubSub+ Platform is 4.7%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

AdnanKhan

Senior System Administrator at Ovrlod

Offers good web hosting capacity and security features, but price needs to be reduced

In terms of Amazon MQ's scalability and throughput capabilities, the tool is mostly accessible, stable, and competent with similar platforms. The tool's web hosting capacity and security features are good. The impact of the solution on process efficiencies depends on the clients. If the traffic is too high for a client, I suggest they go with Azure as it is more scalable and stable, while the support is good. I recommend Azure over Amazon MQ. Starting with Amazon MQ can be a bit tricky, but I know that the product is mature and the support is very good. The integration capabilities of Amazon MQ are flexible. I am not using AI with the tool. I would not recommend Amazon MQ to others. As a service provider, my company usually recommends cheaply priced and reliable solutions to our customers. Azure is one most reliable tool that comes at a good price point. Even Google Cloud is a super solution but for launching Google Cloud, support is not available, so one needs to do it with tutorials which are not completely available in YouTube. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Read full review

BhanuChidigam

Sofware Engineering Manager at Wells Fargo

Performs well, high availability, and helpful support

We use approximately four people for the maintenance of the solution. My advice to others is this solution has high throughput and is used for many stock exchanges. For business critical use cases, such as processing financial transactions at a quick speed, I would recommend this solution. I rate PubSub+ Event Broker an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"The most useful features has been the WAN optimization and probably the HybridEdge, which requires some third-party adapters or plugins. The idea that we can position Solace as a protocol-agnostic message transport fabric is key to our company having all manners of asynchronous messaging protocols from MQ, Kafka, JMS, etc. I really like the WAN optimization: Send once over a WAN, then distribute locally as many times as there are subscribers."

"The valuable feature of PubSub+ Event Broker is the speed of processing, publishing, and consumption."

"One of the main reasons for using PubSub+ is that it is a proper event manager that can handle events in a reactive way."

"In my assessment of Solace against other products — as I was responsible for evaluating various products and bringing the right tool into companies in the past — I worked with multiple platforms like RabbitMQ, Confluent, Kafka, and various other tools in the market. But I found the event mesh capability to be a very interesting as well as fulfilling capability, towards what we want to achieve from a digital-integration-strategy point of view... It's distributed, yet it is intelligently connected. It can also span and I can plug and play any number of brokers into the event mesh, so it's a great deal. That's a differentiator."

"When we went to add another installation in our private cloud, it was easy. We received support from Solace and the install was seamless with no issues."

"I rate the PubSub+ Platform a 9 out of 10."

"As of now, the most valuable aspects are the topic-based subscription and the fanout exchange that we are using."

"The most valuable feature of PubSub+ Event Broker is the scaling integration. Prior to using the solution, it was done manually with a file, and it can be done instantly live."

More PubSub+ Platform pros

Cons

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"The deployment process is complex."

"For improvements, I would suggest increasing the max payload size to a limit of 100MB or more. The current max payload size is limited to 5MB."

"One of the areas of improvement would be if we could tell the story a bit better about what an event mesh does or why an event mesh is foundational to a large enterprise that has a wide diversity of applications that are homegrown and a small number off the shelf."

"The integrations could improve in PubSub+ Event Broker."

"The ease of management could be approved. The GUI is very good, but to configure and manage these devices programmatically in the software version is not easy. For example, if I would like to spin up a new software broker, then I could in theory use the API, but it would require a considerable amount of development effort to do so. There should be a tool, or something that Solace supports, that we could use for this, e.g., a platform like Terraform where we could use infrastructure as code to configure our source appliances."

"I heard that it is quite expensive compared to Kafka."

"We have requested to be able to get into the payload to do dynamic topic hierarchy building. A current workaround is using the message's header, where the business data can be put into this header and be used for a dynamic topic lookup. I want to see this in action when there are a couple of hundred cases live. E.g., how does it perform? From an administration perspective, is the ease of use there?"

"The product should allow third-party agents to be installed. Currently, it is quite proprietary."

More PubSub+ Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"The pricing and licensing were very transparent and well-communicated by our account manager."

"Having a free version is critical for our technology operations use case. This is primarily because our technology operations team is a cost center in our company. They are not profit drivers and having a free version for installation will probably meet our needs. Even for production, it'll support up to a 100,000 messages per second. I don't think in technology operations that we have that many events and alerts from our detection tools. Even if I have 20 or 30 event detection products out there, they're only going to publish the things which are critical or warnings. I don't think we'll ever reach a 100,000 messages per second."

"We have been really happy with the product licensing rates. It has been free for us, up to a 100,000 transactions per second, and all we have to do is pay for support. Making their product available and accessible to us has not been a problem at all."

"The licensing is dependent on the volume that is flowing. If you go for their support services, it will cost some more money, but I think it is worth it, especially if you are just starting your journey."

"We are looking for something that will add value and fit for purpose. Freeware is good if you want to try something quickly without putting in much money. However, as far as our decision is concerned, I don't think it helps. At the end of the day, if we are convinced that a capability is required, we will ask for the funding. Then, when the funding is available, we will go for an enterprise solution only."

"Having a free version of the solution was a big, important part of our decision to go with it. This was the big driver for us to evaluate Solace. We started using it as the free version. When we felt comfortable with the free version, that is when we bought the enterprise version."

"The price of PubSub+ Event Broker is reasonable for the capability it offers. However, when compared to others solutions on the market it is expensive."

"I would rate the product's pricing a ten out of ten."

More PubSub+ Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

34%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

The message queue requires an improvement in the message template MQ link. If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

We are using Amazon MQ for our AI model. It's used for notifications and other services. We have an application for which Amazon MQ acts as a broker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PubSub+ Event Broker?

Regarding improving the PubSub+ Platform, I'm not sure about the pricing aspect, but I heard that it is quite expensive compared to Kafka. That's the only concern I can mention; otherwise, it was a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PubSub+ Event Broker?

My typical use case for the PubSub+ Platform is as an event-driven solution for communication between two components.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering PubSub+ Event Broker?

I have experience working with Kafka, PubSub+ Platform, and IBM MQ, all three of them. We are customers, meaning my company uses Solace. We use it and customize it based on our needs. Based on my e...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 33% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 29% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 16% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 10% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

Apache Kafka vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 29% of the time

IBM MQ vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 23% of the time

ActiveMQ vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Confluent vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon SQS vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More PubSub+ Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

June 2025

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

PubSub+ Platform

June 2025

Download PubSub+ Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

PubSub+ Event Broker, PubSub+ Event Portal

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

PubSub+ Platform supports real-time shipment tracking, IT event management in multiclouds, and connects legacy and cloud-native systems for application modernization. It's utilized for trading, streaming market data, and app-to-app messaging, enhancing event-driven architectures with reliable message queuing.

Organizations adopt PubSub+ to efficiently transport events across hybrid and cloud environments, managing audit trails and long processing tasks. The platform aids integration through dynamic data publication, event mesh capabilities, and WAN optimization. Features like seamless integration, protocol agnosticism, and flexible topic hierarchy enhance versatility. Solace Admin Utility simplifies configuration and management, while the event portal allows hybrid deployment.

What are the key features of PubSub+ Platform?

Dynamic Data Publication: Enables flexible and responsive data handling.
Event Mesh Capabilities: Facilitates efficient event transportation.
WAN Optimization: Enhances data transfer across networks.
Protocol Agnosticism: Supports a wide range of protocols for integration.
Flexible Topic Hierarchy: Allows detailed and organized data exchange.
Solace Admin Utility: Provides intuitive configuration and management.
Granular Topic Filtering: Offers precise data filtering options.
Guaranteed Messaging: Ensures reliable message delivery.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Seamless Integration: Reduces complexity in connecting systems.
Performance and Scaling: Supports high-load environments efficiently.
Asynchronous Messaging: Improves application performance.
Robust Support System: Provides guidance and problem resolution.

PubSub+ is implemented in industries requiring real-time data handling and integration between disparate systems. Financial institutions use it for trading and streaming market data, while logistics companies benefit from real-time shipment tracking. Enterprises apply it to modernize operations by connecting legacy systems with cloud-native applications, enhancing their architecture and ensuring data reliability across environments.

Solace

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

FxPro, TP ICAP, Barclays, Airtel, American Express, Cobalt, Legal & General, LSE Group, Akuna Capital, Azure Information Technology, Brand.net, Canadian Securities Exchange, Core Transport Technologies, Crédit Agricole, Fluent Trade Technologies, Harris Corporation, Korea Exchange, Live E!, Mercuria Energy, Myspace, NYSE Technologies, Pico, RBC Capital Markets, Standard Chartered Bank, Unibet

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.