Amazon FSx vs Iron Mountain Iron Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Iron Mountain are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3, while Iron Mountain is ranked #27. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.3% mindshare in CS, compared to Iron Mountain’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Iron Mountain users who would recommend it.

Amazon FSx

Read 4 Amazon FSx reviews

2,105 Views
1,116 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Iron Mountain Iron Cloud

Read 1 Iron Mountain Iron Cloud review

418 Views
418 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon FSx

Iron Mountain Iron Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon FSx and Iron Mountain Iron Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Google, CTERA and others in Cloud Storage.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon FSx

Ranking in Cloud Storage

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (5th), File and Object Storage (16th)

Iron Mountain Iron Cloud

Ranking in Cloud Storage

27th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Amazon FSx is 3.3%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Iron Mountain Iron Cloud is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon FSx	3.3%
Iron Mountain Iron Cloud	1.0%
Other	95.7%

Cloud Storage

Featured Reviews

Sugan Balakrishnan

Senior Design Engineer at Clovertex

Provides seamless research data management with effortless setup

From my experience, there are areas in Amazon FSx where more performance is needed, as they will be looking for higher IOPS. Sometimes we go with Weka or other solutions due to this need, so it should have more IO capacity when there is a demand. More performance is needed specifically in the IO area.

Read full review

Naved Hussain

Chief Technology Officer at Adani Enterprises Ltd

A SaaS solution that improves efficiency and helps to save time

The tool helps with hidden cloud storage. We can build security practices according to our needs. It is reactive rather than proactive. The solution must conduct extensive research, build a product based on compression and OCR techniques, and improve scalability. I have been using the product…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the stability of Amazon FSx ten out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Amazon FSx a ten."

"The shared storage capability is highly valuable."

"FSx operates as an independent service, not tied to any server, which eliminates dependencies between applications for storage."

"We used it for disaster recovery perspective behind a number of resources, like batch services and RDS."

"The tool helps with hidden cloud storage. We can build security practices according to our needs. It is reactive rather than proactive."

Cons

"Amazon FSx is more costly compared to other storage solutions like EBS or EFS."

"From my experience, there are areas in Amazon FSx where more performance is needed, as they will be looking for higher IOPS."

"A direct FTP feature would be beneficial instead of relying on transmission services."

"Amazon FSx is more costly compared to other storage solutions like EBS or EFS."

"I've been facing a challenge when doing a failover from FSx side. AWS console does not refresh within a half hour."

"The solution must conduct extensive research, build a product based on compression and OCR techniques, and improve scalability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The lowest price I have paid is $370 or $380 per month, while the highest can exceed $3,000 per month."

"Iron Mountain Iron Cloud is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Amazon FSx?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon FSx?

Our customers mainly use Amazon FSx for high-performance computing. Our customers are mainly in the Life Science and Pharma industries. The majority of people are looking at S3 as their destination...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon FSx?

There is an ongoing project where my customers are exploring the FSx solution, but not yet for AI-driven projects; they plan to in the future. For those who want to use Amazon FSx, I recommend it a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Amazon FSx

Compared 12% of the time

Everpure FlashBlade vs Amazon FSx

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs Amazon FSx

Compared 6% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Amazon FSx

Compared 6% of the time

Nasuni vs Amazon FSx

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon FSx Competitors

Box vs Iron Mountain Iron Cloud

Compared 42% of the time

Azure Data Lake Storage vs Iron Mountain Iron Cloud

Compared 39% of the time

More Iron Mountain Iron Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

April 2026

Download Amazon FSx product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

April 2026

Download Iron Mountain Iron Cloud product report

Also Known As

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server, Amazon FSx for Lustre

No data available

Overview

Amazon FSx provides shared storage solutions essential for medium to large enterprises. Known for enhancing data sharing, it excels in high-performance computing with robust scalability.

Offering shared storage, Amazon FSx is vital for organizations requiring high IO capabilities, predominantly in sectors like the Life Sciences and Pharmaceutical industries. Its ability to simplify disaster recovery through cloud-managed backup operations and support for RDS and batch services makes it indispensable for businesses transitioning workloads from on-premises environments. Despite some integration challenges with Windows servers and cost concerns compared to alternatives like EBS or EFS, FSx remains a go-to for its operational independence and significant storage roles in critical applications.

What are the key features of Amazon FSx?

Shared Storage: Facilitates efficient data sharing and storage across networks.
High IO Performance: Supports demanding high-performance computing tasks.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing data needs.
Disaster Recovery Support: Simplifies recovery with managed backups.

What benefits should users expect from Amazon FSx?

Operational Efficiency: Managed by AWS, lessening administrative burdens.
Reliable Recovery: Quick, easy disaster recovery thanks to backup features.
Enterprise Compatibility: Suitable for medium to large business environments.

In specific industries, Amazon FSx finds application in storing S3 data and transitioning on-premises shared folders to cloud-based storage. It's frequently deployed in the Life Sciences and Pharma sectors for high-performance computing. Some also integrate FSx with Boto3 and AWS Lambda to enhance their cloud operations, despite the challenges it presents.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Iron Mountain Iron Cloud is a highly valued cloud storage solution, offering secure storage, data backup, disaster recovery, and long-term data retention.

It simplifies data management, ensures compliance, and enables remote access. Users appreciate its scalability, reliability, and strong security measures for protecting sensitive data and ensuring business continuity.

Iron Mountain

Sample Customers

Neiman Marcus, T Mobile, Docxellent, Matrix, Lyell

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. AIG 5. Air Canada 6. Air France/KLM 7. Allstate 8.American Express 9. Aon 10. Apple 11. ATT 12. Autodesk 13. Bank of America 14. Barclay's 15.Bayer 16. Berkshire Hathaway 17. BlackRock 18. Boeing 19. BNP Paribas 20. Citigroup 21. Coca-Cola 22. Comcast 23. ConocoPhillips 24. Credit Suisse 25. CVS Health 26. Dell 27. Disney 28. Eli Lilly 29. Equinix 30. Exxon 31. FedEx 32. Ford Motor Company

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Google, CTERA and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.