There is an ongoing project where my customers are exploring the FSx solution, but not yet for AI-driven projects; they plan to in the future. For those who want to use Amazon FSx, I recommend it as it's very easy to set up; they can start in a few clicks and within a few minutes. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Amazon FSx a ten.
I must be aware of my specific use case and choose the solution accordingly. I use FSx when shared storage is required without the need for internet connectivity. It is cheaper to use Amazon S3 when possible. I rate the overall solution eight out of ten. Lowering the price would make it better for customers.
Cloud and Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Sep 9, 2024
I would recommend it to everyone who uses AWS platform for storage purposes. It's a really nice tool, and we get what we expected. However, there are those three things: switchover, switchback, documentation, training, and certification. Because this is an AWS-centric storage technology, AWS needs to provide a little bit more elaboration on the tools and technology. From my side, I recommend it to everyone who uses it for disaster recovery or FSx failover, along with migration. They should use it because it provides the ability to migrate, support, mirror data, and recover data. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
File System Software enables efficient management of data by organizing files and directories on storage devices. It is crucial for ensuring data accessibility, storage optimization, and system performance, addressing the complex needs of enterprises handling large volumes of data.This software category is designed to manage file systems on different operating systems, facilitating tasks like file navigation, creation, deletion, reading, and writing operations. Some solutions offer advanced...
There is an ongoing project where my customers are exploring the FSx solution, but not yet for AI-driven projects; they plan to in the future. For those who want to use Amazon FSx, I recommend it as it's very easy to set up; they can start in a few clicks and within a few minutes. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Amazon FSx a ten.
I must be aware of my specific use case and choose the solution accordingly. I use FSx when shared storage is required without the need for internet connectivity. It is cheaper to use Amazon S3 when possible. I rate the overall solution eight out of ten. Lowering the price would make it better for customers.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
I would recommend it to everyone who uses AWS platform for storage purposes. It's a really nice tool, and we get what we expected. However, there are those three things: switchover, switchback, documentation, training, and certification. Because this is an AWS-centric storage technology, AWS needs to provide a little bit more elaboration on the tools and technology. From my side, I recommend it to everyone who uses it for disaster recovery or FSx failover, along with migration. They should use it because it provides the ability to migrate, support, mirror data, and recover data. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.