Amazon FSx vs Elastifile comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
521 views|404 comparisons
Elastifile Logo
53 views|52 comparisons
Ranking
7th
Views
521
Comparisons
404
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
Views
53
Comparisons
52
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
WekaFS logo
Compared 52% of the time.
Nasuni logo
Compared 17% of the time.
Oracle ZFS logo
Compared 16% of the time.
Panzura logo
Compared 8% of the time.
Cohesity SpanFS logo
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Amazon FSx for Windows File Server, Amazon FSx for Lustre
Learn More
Overview

Amazon FSx makes it easy and cost effective to launch and run popular file systems. With Amazon FSx, you can leverage the rich feature sets and fast performance of widely-used open source and commercially-licensed file systems, while avoiding time-consuming administrative tasks like hardware provisioning, software configuration, patching, and backups. It provides cost-efficient capacity and high levels of reliability, and it integrates with other AWS services so that you can manage and use the file systems in cloud-native ways.

Amazon FSx provides you with two file systems to choose from: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server for enterprise workloads and Amazon FSx for Lustre for high-performance workloads.

Elastifile provides the first-ever hybrid cloud data infrastructure, enabling unprecedented consolidation and self-service workflows across private and public clouds. Your application, analytics, and infrastructure teams can manage data across complex workflows with the simplicity and control of a single global namespace. All this is enabled by the Elastifile Cloud File System–a breakthrough application-level distributed file/object system. This elastic, scale-out software-defined solution brings

Combining the availability and data services of enterprise storage with the agility, multi-tenancy and cost-efficiency of webscale architecture, Elastifile delivers flash performance to any and all consolidated workloads, dramatically reducing CAPEX and OPEX for enterprises and service providers.

Sample Customers
Neiman Marcus, T Mobile, Docxellent, Matrix, Lyell
Banca Intesa SanPaolo, eww ITandTEL, eww ag, Corner4, Linfosys, sigmavista it consulting, Rideau
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company23%
Computer Software Company16%
Comms Service Provider7%
Retailer6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available

Amazon FSx is ranked 7th in File System Software while Elastifile is ranked 11th in File System Software. Amazon FSx is rated 0.0, while Elastifile is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Amazon FSx is most compared with WekaFS, Nasuni, Oracle ZFS, Panzura and Cohesity SpanFS, whereas Elastifile is most compared with WekaFS, Red Hat Ceph Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, IBM Spectrum Scale and NetApp AFF.

See our list of best File System Software vendors.

We monitor all File System Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.