Google Workspace and Amazon EFS are prominent contenders in their respective categories, focusing on office productivity suites and scalable storage solutions. While Google Workspace shines for its seamless integration and user-friendliness, Amazon EFS has the upper hand in handling large-scale data and offering flexible scaling options.
Features: Google Workspace provides a comprehensive suite including Gmail for business, Google Drive, and Google Meet, offering excellent collaboration tools and seamless mobile integration. Amazon EFS excels with its auto-scaling storage, tight integration with AWS services, and robust data management capabilities suitable for intensive data needs.
Room for Improvement: Google Workspace could expand its Outlook integration and improve video conferencing features. It may also enhance handling large datasets. Amazon EFS could offer better Windows support and connectivity, as well as clearer pricing models. Both products would benefit from addressing technical support responsiveness.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Workspace is predominantly deployed on public or hybrid clouds, valued for accessibility and flexibility, though support could improve in direct accessibility. Amazon EFS operates mainly in public cloud environments but faces challenges with technical support responsiveness, impacting user experience. Customer service improvements are needed for both brands to adapt to feedback.
Pricing and ROI: Google Workspace offers varied subscription tiers catering to different budgets, providing good ROI with an increase in productivity but faces criticism for high costs of additional features. Amazon EFS operates on a pay-as-you-go model, cost-effective for those requiring scalable storage. Although per-GB costs may be higher compared to other AWS options, its flexibility offers value to those invested in the AWS ecosystem. Pricing strategies differ significantly between the two.
While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week.
Amazon's support model is consistent across services.
Training and support depend on the plan you have, with centralized support being very helpful in case issues arise.
In the past, we experienced a problem with automatic emails being blocked, and the support team resolved the issue quickly.
Its auto-scaling feature is a crucial point, providing high scalability that I would rate at ten out of ten.
Elastic File Systems allow me to scale up or down easily.
It is very cost-effective, and there's no need for initial charges.
It supports around 2,500 users in our company, and this scalability assists us in maintaining our infrastructure.
Scalability involves another configuration with a new email configuration, involving some authentication issues with Microsoft Outlook.
Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS.
While I experienced an EFS mount dropping, it was related to server issues rather than EFS itself.
This stability is crucial to us because it ensures we do not lose communication or connection while using messaging and accessing files.
The only issue is collaboration with Outlook, where I am having a bit of a problem.
Enabling AI-driven or automatic features would be beneficial for new or nontechnical users.
In my project, there are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption.
The new integration was implemented last September, and we are facing some issues with OAuth 2.0 authentication.
The security functionalities are similar to those in competitors like Active Directory, but they could be optimized for stronger security features.
EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.
Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs.
It is very cost-effective with no need for initial charges.
The current cost is approximately seven to ten euros per user per month.
Its ease of integration with other AWS services enhances our infrastructure, while the shared storage access improves reliability and processing continuity for our applications.
They help me process data while maintaining low latency, which is crucial for efficient data processing.
The AWS service is excellent security-wise, and I have seen some other features besides security, such as automatic scaling that helped us significantly.
The valuable features include the email service, email updates, and Google Drive.
These tools enhance productivity by allowing us to edit the same file at the same time, making collaboration much smoother.
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.
When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.
It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.
Similar to G Suite, all Google Workspace plans provide a custom email for your business and include collaboration tools like Gmail, Calendar, Meet, Chat, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Forms, Sites, and more.
As we’ve evolved G Suite into a more integrated experience across our communication and collaboration tools, we’ve rebranded to Google Workspace to more accurately represent the product vision.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
