Google Workspace and Amazon EFS compete in the category of business productivity and cloud storage solutions. Based on the provided information, Google Workspace appears to have the upper hand in terms of accessibility and integration with other services, while Amazon EFS stands out for its scalability and reliability in a cloud storage context.
Features: Google Workspace is designed for collaborative work with tools like Google Docs, Sheets, and Google Meet, which enhance productivity by making document sharing and backup easy through Google Drive. It integrates seamlessly with other Google services, providing users with accessibility and ease of use. Amazon EFS offers scalable and flexible storage solutions with automatic scaling capabilities. It is optimized for seamless integration with AWS services, making it ideal for cloud-based applications requiring shared storage access and reliability.
Room for Improvement: Google Workspace users have reported challenges with document compatibility and limited storage. Some features are seen as less developed compared to competitors like Microsoft, with issues in real-time collaboration and interface intuitiveness. Google Meet could also improve communication clarity and scalability. Amazon EFS users have expressed concerns about cost transparency and the complexity of platform connectivity, especially regarding Windows support. Setup could be streamlined through more automated and AI-driven features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Workspace is predominantly used in public cloud environments, praised for its ease of deployment and low requirement for technical support due to its intuitive design. However, some improvements are needed in support access and response times. Amazon EFS, mainly used in public cloud environments with some on-premises usage, receives similar ratings but occasionally faces delays in support communications, calling for more proactive service enhancements.
Pricing and ROI: Google Workspace provides competitive pricing across various licensing packages, though some users find it expensive when scaling. It offers significant ROI with improved productivity. Amazon EFS applies a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on usage, which some users believe is higher compared to EBS or S3. While appreciated for its storage abilities, doubts about its cost-effectiveness linger compared to other AWS storage solutions.
While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week.
Amazon's support model is consistent across services.
Training and support depend on the plan you have, with centralized support being very helpful in case issues arise.
In the past, we experienced a problem with automatic emails being blocked, and the support team resolved the issue quickly.
With Gemini, I was charged for a year without receiving any guidance on its usage.
Its auto-scaling feature is a crucial point, providing high scalability that I would rate at ten out of ten.
Elastic File Systems allow me to scale up or down easily.
It is very cost-effective, and there's no need for initial charges.
It supports around 2,500 users in our company, and this scalability assists us in maintaining our infrastructure.
Scalability involves another configuration with a new email configuration, involving some authentication issues with Microsoft Outlook.
Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS.
While I experienced an EFS mount dropping, it was related to server issues rather than EFS itself.
The stability of Google Workspace is excellent and very solid.
This stability is crucial to us because it ensures we do not lose communication or connection while using messaging and accessing files.
The only issue is collaboration with Outlook, where I am having a bit of a problem.
Enabling AI-driven or automatic features would be beneficial for new or nontechnical users.
In my project, there are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption.
The new integration was implemented last September, and we are facing some issues with OAuth 2.0 authentication.
The security functionalities are similar to those in competitors like Active Directory, but they could be optimized for stronger security features.
EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.
Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS.
Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs.
The current cost is approximately seven to ten euros per user per month.
Its ease of integration with other AWS services enhances our infrastructure, while the shared storage access improves reliability and processing continuity for our applications.
They help me process data while maintaining low latency, which is crucial for efficient data processing.
It provides extra throughput and IOPS, allowing us to configure it according to the MDA.
The valuable features include the email service, email updates, and Google Drive.
These tools enhance productivity by allowing us to edit the same file at the same time, making collaboration much smoother.
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.
When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.
It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.
Similar to G Suite, all Google Workspace plans provide a custom email for your business and include collaboration tools like Gmail, Calendar, Meet, Chat, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Forms, Sites, and more.
As we’ve evolved G Suite into a more integrated experience across our communication and collaboration tools, we’ve rebranded to Google Workspace to more accurately represent the product vision.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
