

Box and Amazon EFS are prominent competitors in the cloud storage solutions market. Box appears to have an edge with its robust collaboration features and advanced security, which are crucial in today’s security-conscious environment.
Features: Box offers robust collaboration tools and a seamless multi-device experience, making it versatile for users. Its advanced security and compliance features, along with strong third-party integrations, enhance its appeal. Amazon EFS excels in scalability and backup features, allowing it to handle data with fluctuating workloads efficiently. Its serverless configuration and seamless AWS integration provide cost-effective storage solutions tailored for large enterprises needing automatic scaling.
Room for Improvement: Box can enhance intuitive API usability, improve integration with more platforms, and expand security controls. Users desire a more sophisticated search function. Amazon EFS needs better cost transparency, performance optimization, and improved feature compatibility for Windows users. Simplifying user setup and connectivity and improving database workload support are also areas needing attention.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions cater to cloud-based deployment needs. Box is praised for its responsive and knowledgeable customer support, benefiting less technical users with its ease of use. Amazon EFS offers solid customer service but could improve the responsiveness of its technical support. Its AWS integration is a plus, though quicker problem resolution is needed.
Pricing and ROI: Box, while potentially expensive, provides value through its extensive feature set, particularly with negotiated enterprise or educational pricing. It offers ROI via time savings and reduced compliance risks. Amazon EFS's pay-as-you-go model suits dynamic scaling needs, but cost concerns arise with larger data, as EFS’s flexibility is offset by higher costs compared to other AWS storage solutions.
While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week.
Amazon's support model is consistent across services.
Training and support depend on the plan you have, with centralized support being very helpful in case issues arise.
Typically once you do, they are able to provide assistance on whatever you need.
Its auto-scaling feature is a crucial point, providing high scalability that I would rate at ten out of ten.
Elastic File Systems allow me to scale up or down easily.
It is very cost-effective, and there's no need for initial charges.
Box - Intelligent Content Management plans have unlimited data, which is great.
I am uncertain about its effectiveness at an enterprise level, where SharePoint might be preferred.
Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS.
While I experienced an EFS mount dropping, it was related to server issues rather than EFS itself.
Box was very stable and did not have any latency issues.
Database-type workloads do not run properly on Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) because at the end of the day, it is a network file system and requests must travel from one place to another and then return.
Enabling AI-driven or automatic features would be beneficial for new or nontechnical users.
In my project, there are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption.
If Box had an AI feature to summarize and identify documents based on their contents, it would significantly enhance usability.
To open and see who is accessing the document now and see my movements across the document or the file we are sharing together.
Additional customization with the automation workflows that Box - Intelligent Content Management offers would be helpful.
EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.
Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS.
Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs.
I found the pricing reasonable because when I was working for an IBM partner, Box was free for us.
Box - Intelligent Content Management has fairly good pricing for licenses, especially if you do an annual plan.
Its ease of integration with other AWS services enhances our infrastructure, while the shared storage access improves reliability and processing continuity for our applications.
They help me process data while maintaining low latency, which is crucial for efficient data processing.
The most valuable feature of Amazon EFS is its auto-scaling capability.
It enhances the security of our documents, files, and content.
Box had a very easy-to-use search feature and a good user interface on its website, which was faster and better than SharePoint.
I find the synchronization feature most valuable in Box. When I use multiple devices, it syncs them together and gives excellent results.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Box | 4.0% |
| Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) | 3.2% |
| Other | 92.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
Amazon EFS provides elastic file storage in the cloud, offering unlimited storage and seamless integration with AWS services for dynamic workloads.
Amazon EFS serves as a scalable, shareable file storage across Linux servers, seamlessly integrating with AWS for data-intensive applications. Its auto-scaling capability handles shifting data demands in real time, ensuring cost-effective storage management. Offering high availability and support for NFS version 4, Amazon EFS optimizes performance and data integrity for cloud and serverless environments. While its strengths lie in scalability and Linux support, further enhancements in cost transparency, Windows compatibility, and deployment simplicity can broaden its applicability.
What are the key features of Amazon EFS?Amazon EFS is widely implemented in industries needing robust cloud-based storage solutions, facilitating scalable storage for applications like web serving, content management, and data analytics. Its compatibility with EC2 and Linux optimizes resource management, supporting complex access needs and enhancing operational efficiency in technology-focused sectors.
Box offers seamless integration with third-party apps, strong collaboration tools, and secure content distribution to enhance productivity across devices.
Box is a powerful platform for file storage and collaboration, known for its security, ease of use, and advanced integration options. Supporting seamless synchronization and real-time editing, Box facilitates effective teamwork and secure sharing of content both internally and externally. Though it faces challenges such as folder-level security and collaboration speed, Box remains a preferred choice for enterprises seeking efficient document management and secure file transfers. Its robust feature set, including metadata management and customizable permissions, supports remote work and facilitates easy access to stored documents and workflows.
What are the key features of Box?
Why do users appreciate using Box?
In industries like finance, healthcare, and legal, Box is employed for secure document storage and sharing, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Teams leverage its features for secure project collaboration, e-signatures, and handling large files, making it invaluable in sectors requiring strict data management protocols.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.