Amazon CloudWatch vs Kaseya Traverse comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Kaseya are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.1, while Kaseya is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.0% mindshare in CMS, compared to Kaseya’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Kaseya users who would recommend it.

Amazon CloudWatch

Read 48 Amazon CloudWatch reviews

4,548 Views
1,728 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Kaseya Traverse

Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews

961 Views
452 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Amazon CloudWatch

Kaseya Traverse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Amazon CloudWatch and Kaseya Traverse compete in the IT infrastructure monitoring category. Amazon CloudWatch holds an advantage due to its seamless integration with AWS services, providing a user-friendly experience and a comprehensive set of features designed specifically for AWS environments.

Features: Amazon CloudWatch offers seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem, detailed real-time analytics, and robust alarms with per-minute data granularity. It excels in task automation and system-wide visibility across AWS infrastructures. Kaseya Traverse stands out with its comprehensive monitoring capabilities across multiple devices, system-wide insights, and powerful processing capabilities, making it ideal for a centralized view of diverse IT infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: Amazon CloudWatch could enhance its dashboard for improved data visualization and expand its monitoring capabilities to include non-AWS services. Pricing adjustments and simplifying complex metrics would be beneficial. Kaseya Traverse could improve its integration experience, develop a CMDB, and offer better workflow automation. Addressing inadequate reporting and enhancing technical support would greatly improve user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon CloudWatch operates primarily in the public cloud with flexible support options, where documentation and expert assistance receive positive feedback despite paid customer service. Kaseya Traverse provides options across public, hybrid, and on-premises environments but experiences challenges with integration and support, leading to mixed user experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon CloudWatch's pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective for AWS users but requires careful navigation of potential cost spikes. It promises significant ROI by reducing manual monitoring tasks. Kaseya Traverse offers competitive pricing with all-inclusive features, which is seen as reasonable, providing ROI through comprehensive monitoring of multiple devices.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon CloudWatch vs. Kaseya Traverse Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon CloudWatch vs. Kaseya Traverse

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon CloudWatch

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (13th), Log Management (15th)

Kaseya Traverse

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

35th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (58th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Amazon CloudWatch is 2.0%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon CloudWatch	2.0%
Kaseya Traverse	0.6%
Other	97.4%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Azam S M

Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC

Has provided reliable monitoring and alerting through extensive metric tracking and dashboard configuration

Amazon CloudWatch itself provides a lot of data. However, for visualization, we need to use third-party tools. We are in a process of integrating Grafana, Loki, and Prometheus to have better visualization on Amazon CloudWatch. We are also integrating Grafana with the application itself to get the application data and logs. Alternatively, there is AWS Kinesis and Glue where you can scrape the logs and have visualization, but a more easy option is Grafana. If you want to get a proper visual representation to see what is happening, then you need to integrate a third-party tool. Amazon CloudWatch has all the data, but to see what is happening, you need some third-party tool.

Read full review

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN

Technical Consultant at a university with 11-50 employees

Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive

Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's UI is good. One can scroll through the logs very easily."

"Amazon CloudWatch's best feature stems from its ability to monitor app performance."

"CloudWatch provides essential monitoring capabilities that integrate seamlessly with other AWS services."

"The detection is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch is collecting the logs from Lambda."

"You can enable alarms and metrics, and it has robust integration with AWS services. You can also trigger events. For example, if the CPU utilization is above 80%, it can launch a new instance for you."

"Amazon CloudWatch is a cheap and easy-to-use solution."

"Most of it's around optimizing utilization, their cloud utilization. They're making sure that they're getting the most out of their in-cloud environments and their instances. Making sure that there's no strange behavior in the environment."

More Amazon CloudWatch pros

"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."

"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."

"It's a simple and humble tool."

"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."

"It is a pretty stable solution...It is a pretty stable solution."

"The remote support and data collection features are great."

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."

"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."

More Kaseya Traverse pros

Cons

"Right now, in relation to monitoring services, there are too many services and too many metrics per service."

"The solution could benefit from a price decrease."

"The monitoring part and GUI are areas in Amazon CloudWatch that have shortcomings currently and can be considered for improvements in the future."

"The solution's integration could be easier for laypersons."

"The dashboard of Amazon CloudWatch is not very customizable right now."

"The solution's pricing is a bit higher."

"Amazon CloudWatch's pricing needs improvement."

"The graphical interface has room for improvement. CloudWatch only gives you a breakdown of what's wrong. However, it would be nice if it could automatically remedy the problems it identifies. You should be able to configure it so that when a specific condition arises, it will take a predefined action."

More Amazon CloudWatch cons

"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."

"Reporting is a bit difficult."

"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."

"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."

"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."

"We've noticed a few bugs as of late. However, this seems to only be in the reporting part of the product."

"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."

"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."

More Kaseya Traverse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is not expensive."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"The solution is expensive."

"Amazon CloudWatch has very cheap pricing, and it hardly costs my company $25-$30 a month for fifty systems, so it's pretty affordable."

"The pricing is average."

"The pricing model is pay-as-you-go so you have to be mindful of usage to manage costs."

"The price is okay for me."

"The price of Amazon CloudWatch is reasonable. When the rate of data collection is done the price will increase. The price is less than other solutions."

More Amazon CloudWatch pricing and cost advice

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."

"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Transportation Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon CloudWatch?

The monitoring features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon CloudWatch?

No specific setup costs were mentioned.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon CloudWatch?

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?

The remote support and data collection features are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?

The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?

See all answers

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon CloudWatch Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 18% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 14% of the time

DX Performance Management vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Kaseya Traverse

Compared 12% of the time

More Kaseya Traverse Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon CloudWatch

January 2026

Download Amazon CloudWatch product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaseya Traverse

January 2026

Download Kaseya Traverse product report

Overview

Amazon CloudWatch integrates seamlessly with AWS, providing real-time monitoring and alerting features. Its interface supports task automation, enhancing troubleshooting and analytics capabilities, while offering strong security and scalability at a cost-effective rate.

Amazon CloudWatch is an impactful platform for monitoring AWS resources and managing application performance. It simplifies infrastructure performance monitoring by providing comprehensive analytics capabilities, including application insights and event scheduling. Users appreciate CloudWatch for its detailed metrics, dashboards, and support in issuing alerts to detect anomalies. It efficiently tracks performance, optimizes resource utilization, and ensures service availability. CloudWatch is recognized for its robust alerting features and integration with other AWS services, further supporting its resource monitoring capabilities. However, there is room for improvement in dashboard customization, log streaming speed, and integration with non-AWS services. Enhancements in API integration, machine learning features, and support for third-party tools are also desired.

What features does Amazon CloudWatch offer?

Seamless Integration: Works effortlessly with AWS for cohesive service management.
Advanced Metrics: Provides detailed monitoring of CPU, memory, and more.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers up-to-the-minute alerts on infrastructure status.
Dashboards: User-friendly and informative for quick insights.
Automation: Supports task automation for efficient troubleshooting.

What benefits does Amazon CloudWatch provide?

Cost-effectiveness: Efficient resource monitoring without high costs.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing infrastructure needs.
Security: Strong protocols for safe monitoring activities.
Improved Performance: Enhances application insights and operational efficiency.
Operational Insights: Provides comprehensive logging and performance analysis.

Industries implementing Amazon CloudWatch often focus on optimizing IT infrastructure. Companies in sectors like finance and e-commerce rely on its monitoring and alerting capabilities to ensure service uptime and performance. The platform's automation and analytics features empower teams to proactively manage performance and detect potential issues promptly.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Sample Customers

AirAsia, Airbnb, Aircel, APUS, Avazu, Casa & Video, Futbol Club Barcelona (FCBarcelona), National Taiwan University, redBus

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust

Buyer's Guide

Amazon CloudWatch vs. Kaseya Traverse

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon CloudWatch vs. Kaseya Traverse

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon CloudWatch vs. Kaseya Traverse and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon CloudWatch vs. Kaseya Traverse report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.