Amazon Aurora Serverless vs Oracle Multitenant comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.0% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Read 3 Amazon Aurora Serverless reviews

335 Views
328 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Multitenant

Read 21 Oracle Multitenant reviews

666 Views
659 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Oracle Multitenant

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle Multitenant and Amazon Aurora Serverless are competing in database management, focusing on scalability and efficiency. Amazon Aurora Serverless has the upper hand due to its compelling features that justify its cost.

Features: Oracle Multitenant focuses on consolidated database management, providing simplicity and efficient resource sharing among pluggable databases. Amazon Aurora Serverless offers automated scaling, powerful failover capabilities, and seamless adaptability to variable workloads.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Aurora Serverless ensures a straightforward deployment process with automation support, reducing administrative burdens. Oracle Multitenant promises comprehensive assistance with a dedicated team, while Amazon relies on a community-focused approach for support.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Multitenant involves a higher initial setup cost but delivers substantial ROI through centralized management. Amazon Aurora Serverless offers a flexible pricing model, paying only for resources used, enhancing cost efficiency for fluctuating demands.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Multitenant Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Multitenant

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Multitenant

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora Serverless is 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Multitenant is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Multitenant	1.0%
Amazon Aurora Serverless	1.0%
Other	98.0%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

MohitGupta3

Cloud Infrastructure Architect - AWS at Infopro Digital

Seamless growth management through serverless efficiency and reasonable pricing

The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora Serverless is its serverless nature, which means I do not have to maintain the underlying infrastructure. Additionally, it is highly scalable, and its pricing model is favorable. Aurora's automatic scaling greatly enhances our operational efficiency by eliminating the need to set specific thresholds and preventing client data access issues due to uneven growth. Its serverless setup allows us to manage costs effectively. Other notable features include direct integration with tools like SFTP Go for media file uploads, automatic backups ensuring data recovery, and its scalability in terms of handling growing database demands.

Read full review

Saikat Nag

Oracle Application Database Administrator at RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Manages extensive utility billing applications efficiently with trusted performance and robust support

Currently, I have a very good experience with Oracle Multitenant. The pluggable database is easy to handle and manage, sharing resources efficiently. However, Oracle license pricing is an issue due to its high cost. Our organization is compelled to reduce CPU usage by seventy CPUs because the Oracle license cost depends on it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon Aurora Serverless is easy to scale, offering a cluster-based shared scaling model with options for Autoscale."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora Serverless is its serverless nature, which means I do not have to maintain the underlying infrastructure."

"Aurora could improve its affordability, even though its price is very completive compared to DBs as SLQ Server."

"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"

"It is quite stable. We have not faced any kind of instability in the database."

"The stability of Oracle Multitenant is excellent, and I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine."

"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."

"It's easy to use and works great."

"The most valuable features are the speed and ease of use."

"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. Our clients are mostly medium and enterprise businesses."

More Oracle Multitenant pros

Cons

"Amazon Aurora could improve its detailed monitoring, especially in CloudWatch, to provide more precise query level insights."

"Amazon Aurora Serverless could benefit from a few more security features, particularly in terms of its accessibility."

"Aurora could improve its affordability, as it is currently considered a bit expensive."

"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."

"There are many functions where changes are not easy to implement, and we try to avoid modifying these areas due to security issues and the complexity of maintaining them."

"The solution is partially extendable. It is not very easy to scale. If we want to grow, we need additional servers, which is why we are considering the cloud."

"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."

"Oracle license pricing is an issue due to its high cost. Our organization is compelled to reduce CPU usage by seventy CPUs because the Oracle license cost depends on it."

"This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."

"The user interface for this solution can be made better."

"There is room for improvement in customer service and support."

More Oracle Multitenant cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"For me, I will go with it if I have the budget. Some features are nicer than before, but at the end of the day, you always have a limited budget. I prefer to upgrade and get a specific hardware when possible. At the end, you will have to make a compromise. You will not get everything you would have liked to have."

"The price is worth the quality."

"This solution is a little bit pricey."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora Serverless?

In my experience, Aurora is a bit expensive. The costs depend on the size of the database.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Aurora could improve its affordability, as it is currently considered a bit expensive. There is room to make it more cost-effective for users even though its price is very completive compared to DB...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Aurora Serverless?

I use Aurora mainly for creating and maintaining databases, such as Aurora (MySQL version) databases, within the system. I value it for its network security and quicker recovery options.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Multitenant?

The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Multitenant?

I am only involved in the development part and not familiar with the pricing details.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Multitenant?

There are no improvements needed in Oracle Multitenant, but improvements could be made in the AI part. We feel that the server, OAS, the analytics server, is missing an AI component which exists in...

See all answers

Comparisons

PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora Serverless

Compared 60% of the time

Citus Data vs Amazon Aurora Serverless

Compared 20% of the time

SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora Serverless

Compared 10% of the time

CockroachDB vs Amazon Aurora Serverless

Compared 10% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Serverless Competitors

SQL Server vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 30% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 23% of the time

Citus Data vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Database vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 15% of the time

SAP HANA vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 13% of the time

More Oracle Multitenant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

November 2025

Download Amazon Aurora Serverless product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Multitenant

December 2025

Download Oracle Multitenant product report

Also Known As

No data available

Oracle Pluggable Database

Overview

Amazon Aurora Serverless is a flexible, on-demand database service that automatically scales based on application needs. It removes the need for database management, allowing businesses to focus on innovation and efficiency.

This database service provides automatic rescaling of compute capacity, which makes it uniquely suited to unpredictable workloads and applications with variable demand. It integrates seamlessly with existing AWS services and supports both MySQL and PostgreSQL, ensuring high availability and durability while reducing costs associated with over-provisioning of resources. Aurora Serverless dynamically adjusts capacity, providing a cost-effective and reliable solution for cloud-native applications and serverless architectures.

What are the key features of Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Automatic Scaling: Instantly adjusts capacity in response to demand.
Managed Infrastructure: Offloads database maintenance and management tasks.
High Availability: Provides multi-AZ support to ensure uptime and reliability.
MySQL and PostgreSQL Compatibility: Supports migrations and existing applications.
Pay-Per-Use: Charges are based on the exact resources utilized.

What benefits can be found in reviews of Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Cost Savings: Helps significantly reduce infrastructure expenses.
Operational Efficiency: Frees up time for the IT team for strategic projects.
Scalability: Easily accommodates fluctuating application demands.
Integration: Works seamlessly with AWS services, enhancing service reach.
Resiliency: Robust data protection features contribute to data security.

Amazon Aurora Serverless has been widely adopted across industries such as ecommerce and online media, where demand can vary greatly and unpredictably. For instance, ecommerce platforms benefit from auto-scaling during peak shopping seasons, ensuring uninterrupted service without incurring unnecessary costs during off-peak periods. Similarly, media companies leverage its auto-scaling capabilities to manage traffic spikes during events or breaking news.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle Multitenant - an Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition option – introduces a new architecture that enables customers to easily consolidate multiple databases, without changing their applications. This new architecture delivers all the benefits of managing many databases as one, yet retains the isolation and resource prioritization of separate databases. In addition, Oracle Multitenant enables rapid provisioning and upgrades, and fully complements other options including Oracle Real Application Clusters and Active Data Guard.

For more information on Oracle Multitenant, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

An Post, National Oilwell Varco, SAS Institute, Sportmaster, Y-Telecom

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Multitenant

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Multitenant

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Multitenant and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Multitenant report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.