We performed a comparison between Alteryx Designer and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Alteryx Designer is its ability to select all the inputs and formulas."
"I have been using Alteryx Designer only for data modeling and data structuring."
"When you open a raw Excel file, it can be hard to look at everything in detail. Alteryx makes it much easier to go through the data, summarize it, and use different tools for analysis."
"Workflow automation, in general, is valuable."
"The functionality of drag and drop is the most valuable. It is a very user-friendly tool that can be understood easily. My teams also work with other solutions, such as Integration Services, and these solutions are very difficult for people who don't have technical knowledge."
"It has an easy setup process."
"For my daily analytics needs, the entire Alteryx Designer platform is beneficial."
"I like Alteryx Designer's drag-and-drop feature, where you drag a component, configure it and quickly run it."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"When it comes to the pivoting part, the drill-through option is not there in Alteryx."
"Alteryx Designer's pricing and support could be improved."
"The only thing is sometimes it can be a bit slow."
"Its cost can sometimes be a drawback."
"The price of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The conditional join feature should be improved."
"An improvement for Alteryx Designer would be faster bug fixes and updates."
"Alteryx Designer's cost should be improved."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"The price could be improved."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
Alteryx Designer is ranked 9th in Data Integration with 26 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 40 reviews. Alteryx Designer is rated 8.0, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Alteryx Designer writes "An easy-to-use automation solution with satisfying customer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Alteryx Designer is most compared with Azure Data Factory, FME, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS and Palantir Foundry, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Alteryx Designer vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.