No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Alteryx Designer vs Infogix Data360 Analyze [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alteryx Designer
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (40th)
Infogix Data360 Analyze [EOL]
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Ajay Nayak - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Data Engineer at Baxter International Inc.
An easy-to-use automation solution with satisfying customer support
Sometimes, while getting data from a third-party product, like data sources that are not present in your system, Alteryx works a bit slowly. Even if you have a good configuration and you are pulling data from an SQL server like SAP, then the solution also has a slow work process. It shouldn't be that much slow if you are pulling ten thousand records, it should not take thirty minutes.
reviewer1321299 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Analytics Consultant at velocity
Easy drag-and-drop interface and supports custom Python functions, but the performance needs to be better
The memory processing needs to be improved because when you deal with a large amount of data, the interface tends to hang a little bit. When the system boots up, it can take between two and five minutes, depending on the system memory (RAM). If the system is low on memory then it takes a long time to start up. If you are not familiar with Python then this product will be a little more difficult for you. It can take a long time to migrate from one version to the next because there are a lot of processes to deal with.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Alteryx Designer is a tool that is pretty much easy to install."
"The solution is easy to integrate and user-friendly."
"We use Alteryx Designer for analytics. It's quite helpful because once we set it up, we don't have to manually update or process data repeatedly. It saves time, especially for financial reporting, which is typically done monthly or quarterly. Once we set it up initially, we only need to make occasional updates if necessary."
"Alteryx Designer is stable."
"I mainly use Alteryx Designer for automation purposes."
"I believe in the ability to connect to multiple data sources, as well as the ease of use to transform data and output data in a variety of formats."
"We automate analytics tasks saving thousand of ours from our clients, starting with a scenario of a lot of manual work and then automating it, offering very good analytics with much more power through geospacial analytics and data science."
"The solution's ability to hold a huge amount of data in its memory is significant."
"The drag-and-drop functionality makes it easy for business users."
"This solution allows you to include your own functions that are coded in Python."
 

Cons

"Sometimes, while getting data from a third-party product, the solution works slowly."
"We discontinued using Alteryx's data science studio because it was not very user-friendly."
"When it comes to the pivoting part, the drill-through option is not there in Alteryx."
"Alteryx is a little bit expensive compared to competing solutions."
"Alteryx Designer's pricing and support could be improved."
"For smaller clients with ten to 15 employees, Alteryx can be expensive."
"If the price were reduced then it would be more competitive."
"Based on my experience, the tool could be improved by providing sample reports or pre-configured workflows tailored to specific industries, like finance. It needs to integrate an AI chatbot as well."
"The memory processing needs to be improved because when you deal with a large amount of data, the interface tends to hang a little bit."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Alteryx Designer is an expensive solution."
"The product is a bit expensive, it should be looked into."
"I rate Alteryx Designer a six out of ten for pricing."
"The pricing is bit expensive."
"Alteryx Designer is an expensive solution."
"Each license is something like $4,000."
"I rate the price of Alteryx Designer a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"Alteryx is a little bit expensive compared to competing solutions."
"The open-source version is free to use, although it has a limitation of two-million records."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise17
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Alteryx Designer?
It's cheaper than Palantir, but even Alteryx is too much for small clients. It is expensive, considering the server capabilities.
What needs improvement with Alteryx Designer?
For smaller clients with ten to 15 employees, Alteryx can be expensive. The server capabilities are costly too. The technical support could also improve by being quicker in response times.
What is your primary use case for Alteryx Designer?
I have used Alteryx Designer to perform predictive analytics that helps in predicting the selling of products, particularly in banking and financial areas.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
citi, swedbank, RSA, MasterCard, travelers, telstra
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Palantir, Microsoft and others in Data Integration. Updated: September 2026.
914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.