Alluvio Aternity vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Riverbed and Kovai.co are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #31 with an average rating of 9.0, while Kovai.co is ranked #66. Riverbed holds a 0.7% mindshare in APM, compared to Kovai.co’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kovai.co users who would recommend it.

Alluvio Aternity

Read 39 Alluvio Aternity reviews

3,959 Views
2,494 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews

3,100 Views
1,395 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Alluvio Aternity

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio Aternity and Turbo360 (formerly Serverless360) compete in performance monitoring and application management. Turbo360 appears to have an edge due to its extensive features despite higher costs.

Features: Alluvio Aternity offers granular monitoring, detailed reporting, and application performance insights. Turbo360 provides comprehensive end-to-end tracking, seamless integration capabilities, and a broader feature set for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Alluvio Aternity users suggest enhancements in real-time alerting, reducing setup complexity, and improved user experience. Turbo360 users indicate needs for better documentation, more intuitive functionalities, and additional user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Alluvio Aternity deployment is straightforward but requires extensive configuration, with well-rated customer support. Turbo360 offers quick deployment and consistently prompt, helpful customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Alluvio Aternity offers competitive pricing and strong ROI through efficient problem resolution. Turbo360 has a higher cost but justifies it with extensive features and integrations, delivering substantial long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio Aternity vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio Aternity

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

31st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile APM (4th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (6th)

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

66th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (46th), Cloud Monitoring Software (40th), Cloud Cost Management (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio Aternity is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Alluvio Aternity	0.7%
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)	0.7%
Other	98.6%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh Mishra

Technical Lead at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.

Monitoring end-user activity has improved visibility into device and application performance

In my opinion, Riverbed can make Alluvio Aternity better by having the same Aternity agent help in security, such as antivirus or EDR, which would be useful, allowing customers to avoid having multiple agents installed on their endpoint machines. Deploying multiple agents can use the processor and utilize memory, so it's better to go with one agent. If one agent can do end-user activity monitoring and act as an EDR, then it would be better for the end-user, allowing easy avoidance of installing multiple agents on their machines.

Read full review

reviewer1858887

Software Development Engineer In Test at Quinbay

Centralized, great for performing corrective actions and has a helpful Business Activity Monitoring module

1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and a few more Azure services. 3) It would be much better if it is a multi-cloud management/monitoring platform. 4) The consolidated error reports sent via the alerting channels can be a bit more intuitive. 5) Their customer support was good but good technical documentation or feature videos can be even more helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dashboards of this platform are the most valuable, especially the Desktop Health dashboard."

"Customer service is the best I have ever encountered from a software vendor."

"It is a tool that helps me check users' computers really quickly without having a help desk administrator logging in and doing analysis. Anyone who has access to Aternity, including our support team, can log onto Aternity and do a quick, basic analysis."

"With Aternity you can gather that perspective quickly, it's gathered automatically, so that slow response time or issues with the application, hung workstations or network issues, you get that perspective right away."

"It's one of those rare, genuine products that does what it says on the tin."

"While it also provides desktop metrics, the main thing we use it for is monitoring our applications."

"We have seen return on our investment with Aternity."

"The most valuable feature is the alerting. As soon as we click on an incident, it takes us directly to the problematic PC. It's a direct solution. We click on an alert and it takes us to the incident details. The details show in different colors, in a graphical representation, and I like that the most."

More Alluvio Aternity pros

"That is exactly where Serverless360 helped us by bringing in both Service Bus management and monitoring under the same hood."

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

"Serverless360 transformed the way our organizations manage Azure and hybrid integrations."

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

Cons

"The biggest improvement would be the ease with which you monitor applications. It's a little clunky right now; it takes a little bit of time."

"The other place for improvement, as an on-prem, non-SaaS customer, is that the system administration and management in Aternity are very difficult."

"For me, the biggest problem is the price. It is not so much about how much it costs. It is about Aternity only giving you 12 months upfront. So, you got to purchase it for 12 months. A lot of our customers are on a per-user-per-month type billing. They are all OPEX rather than CAPEX. It would be a lot better for our customers if there was an option available for OPEX so that it is billed on a monthly basis than a yearly basis. They've got only Windows agents. They don't actually have mobile agents. It would be a lot better if they could also integrate Android and iOS because then we can start pulling steps and performance management out of users' mobile devices. That's the biggest addition I would suggest at the moment. A lot of our customers have desktops as well as tablets or mobile devices. We should be able to monitor that stuff as well."

"I would say the reporting capabilities of this product could use room for improvement. The standard reports that are given are not the greatest, and no custom ones can be created; however, I am told that the latest version of Aternity offers this!"

"I would say the reporting capabilities of this product could use room for improvement."

"The other place for improvement, as an on-prem, non-SaaS customer, is that the system administration and management in Aternity are very difficult. They've even told me that most of their support calls come in due to configuration and system administration on their on-prem. Their on-prem solution is not easy to use."

"Potentially, the one thing that could probably help with better levels of enterprise adoption is around creating the application monitoring signatures."

"They've additionally added some great color coding, but they need to explain better and drive down further on the meanings of this workflow."

More Alluvio Aternity cons

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable for the value that it gives because it does allow you to measure the cost ramifications of direct productivity loss for spends in both your infrastructure and on endpoints."

"It is definitely a premium solution; it is not an inexpensive product. We have to ensure that we are getting the most out of it in order to justify the cost. However, it is not cheap, especially when you want to install it on all your endpoints."

"The pricing for the users and agents is reasonable compared to other solutions and vendors."

"The solution's price is pretty comparable to the industry."

"I thought the price for Alluvio Aternity was reasonable, but we had difficulty selling it in our market due to the minimum number of agents required for deployment, which I believe was around 500."

"The price for Alluvio Aternity is favorable."

"You have to purchase it for 12 months, which is an issue because a lot of our customers are on a per-user-per-month type billing. There are a few additional costs. A lot of customers only get the essential licenses, and then they get what they call the application add-ons on top. They have to pay depending on how many customers and applications they want to monitor."

"Pricing is a bit high. Don't take that as the "be all, end all"."

More Alluvio Aternity pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	32

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aternity?

Riverbed is costly in the Indian market; I would rate the pricing for Alluvio Aternity as a higher price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aternity?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aternity?

The main use case for Alluvio Aternity is end-user activity monitoring, which is the process I'm mainly using currently.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Nexthink vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 13% of the time

Dynatrace vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 9% of the time

SysTrack vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs Alluvio Aternity

Compared 4% of the time

More Alluvio Aternity Competitors

Datadog vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 7% of the time

CAST AI vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 5% of the time

Harness vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 4% of the time

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity

May 2026

Download Alluvio Aternity product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2026

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report

Download Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report

Also Known As

Aternity, Workforce APM, Aternity Frontline, Riverbed SteelCenter Aternity

Serverless360

Overview

Alluvio Aternity offers detailed insights into user experience, device health, and application response times. It provides real-time data and visibility for enhanced performance and incident management with customizable monitoring and flexible integration.

Alluvio Aternity is a robust monitoring tool designed for detailed environmental insights, dashboards, and trend analysis that help optimize application performance and incident management. Users benefit from its real-time data, which aids proactive troubleshooting by providing visibility into end-user devices. Custom dashboards, benchmarks, and flexible Tableau integration facilitate easy data manipulation, ensuring comprehensive monitoring of standard and custom applications. While the interface complexity and desire for simpler monitor building pose challenges, Aternity remains a valuable resource for digital experience monitoring and performance assessment, particularly for platforms like Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, and Office 365.

What are the key features of Alluvio Aternity?

Real-Time Data: Provides immediate visibility into end-user devices for proactive troubleshooting.
Custom Dashboards: Allows creation of tailored dashboards for performance evaluation.
Trend Analysis: Offers insight into application performance trends to help optimize operations.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Tableau for versatile data manipulation.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Covers both standard and custom applications for wide-ranging insights.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Alluvio Aternity?

Enhanced Performance: Real-time data aids in improving application and device performance.
Proactive Troubleshooting: Immediate insights enable quicker response to issues.
Custom Monitoring: Tailored dashboards and monitoring cater to unique operational needs.
Flexible Data Use: Integration with tools like Tableau allows for effective data use and analysis.

Enterprises across industries leverage Alluvio Aternity for end-user activity monitoring and application performance assessment. They use its insights for digital experience monitoring and problem isolation, particularly in environments including remote sites and retail branches, measuring key metrics like CPU and memory usage.

Riverbed

Turbo360, previously known as Serverless360, provides advanced capabilities for managing distributed systems efficiently, catering to a knowledgeable audience seeking streamlined operations and enhanced performance.

Turbo360 offers a comprehensive suite designed to support businesses in tracking and managing complex distributed applications. It equips professionals with essential tools to simplify the intricate processes of application integration and monitoring, ensuring seamless operational functionality. Targeting a tech-savvy audience, Turbo360 enhances oversight and control over application processes, optimizing resource use and fault detection.

What are the key features of Turbo360?

Integration Tracking: Monitors data flow across applications.
Error Management: Detects and resolves system issues swiftly.
Performance Monitoring: Provides insights into application efficiency.
Resource Optimization: Streamlines resource allocation for better performance.

Why choose Turbo360?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with optimized resource use.
Improved Performance: Enhances application speed and reliability.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with ease.

Industries implementing Turbo360, specifically in finance and healthcare, benefit from its robust tracking and monitoring abilities, improving service delivery and resource management. Its adaptability makes it a preferred choice for organizations focusing on innovation and digital transformation.

Kovai.co

Sample Customers

Maersk, SwissRe, Travis Perkins, Michelin, National Instruments, Simmons & Simmons, Lighthouse Guild

MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio Aternity vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

April 2026

Free Report: Alluvio Aternity vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio Aternity vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio Aternity vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.