No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Aisera Assistant vs Kore.ai comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aisera Assistant
Ranking in AI IT Support
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kore.ai
Ranking in AI IT Support
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
AI Agent Builders (7th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (7th), AI Security (7th), AI Customer Support (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the AI IT Support category, the mindshare of Aisera Assistant is 1.0%. The mindshare of Kore.ai is 1.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI IT Support Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kore.ai1.1%
Aisera’s AI Copilot1.0%
Other97.9%
AI IT Support
 

Featured Reviews

VF
Chief Information Officer at a media company with 1-10 employees
Automated password workflows have cut help desk calls and improve user self-service success
The best features Aisera's AI Copilot offers include automated responses for users and a binary option where expected responses versus anything else can be handled. It has a standard response for anything that is not fitting into the specific question asked by the chatbot. The ability to give standard responses and handle expected versus unexpected answers has helped our team and end users by reducing confusion about what Aisera's AI Copilot can do and cannot do, streamlining the process so people know they can use it for a password reset primarily. Regarding Aisera's AI Copilot's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security are evolving and it is in line with our requirements for ISO 22001. The accuracy and reliability of output from Aisera's AI Copilot is very good. Unfortunately, it is the old adage about garbage in, garbage out. As long as you take your time, work through your workflow to have accurate information and then negate anything that is not an expected response, you will be successful.
Judin Augustin - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Data Scientist at Guide House
Automation has reduced large call centers and provides real-time outbound support for patients
Kore.ai is a low-code platform, and you do not necessarily have to be an expert in artificial intelligence or generative AI to use this platform. However, if you have that experience, it will be a valuable add-on. The main advantage is that it has almost every kind of plugin available to use, whether for live agents or if you want to use it as a call center. You have real-time capabilities and the most useful plugins available, with almost every kind of model available with configurations. We can configure the ML models and train them. The platform is very user-friendly with explanatory features and a great UI. One significant feature is the live testing platform with Kore.ai. When you are creating a workflow, you have an interactive, real-time testing platform that reflects every change you make. This makes it easy to debug errors or add new features. Additionally, Kore.ai has many different tools and platforms that cater to different needs, whether for a call center, normal workflow, or machine learning workflow, which is really useful. Because of Kore.ai, it was much easier than creating something manually. A low-code platform always helps, and when that platform has this much capability, it provides far more value than manual development. It was particularly helpful for our team that we could create a POC and get that project into production. Kore.ai helped our team build a generative AI outbound calling chatbot, and it truly helped our customers. If you have a hospital with a thousand employees in a call center, you might consider outsourcing. However, with Kore.ai's outbound calling capabilities, you can eliminate the outsourcing part. You do not need a thousand call center employees. You can accomplish this through automation with just one or two employees if people need to switch to agents. This represented a significant cost reduction.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Since deploying the chatbot, we have seen a 95% reduction in support tickets for anything related to password resets or password changes."
"Aisera's AI Copilot has achieved up to 75% automation of user requests, which is going to reduce our 80% consumer operation costs."
"Accuracy-wise, Aisera's AI Copilot is very good."
"Overall, Aisera's AI Copilot has become much more than a helpdesk tool for me; it is a central nervous system connecting employees to information and IT support across the entire organization."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by simplifying the process of responding to emails and streamlining the workflow, saving me considerable time."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization because we are implementors, and I would say that approximately 80% of our income comes from developed projects with Kore.ai."
"Kore.ai is outstanding compared to other AI agent platforms such as Copilot Studio due to the centralized nature and integration of different apps within a single platform."
"It impacted my organization by helping us move into being AI-native, and it helped a lot to show other clients that we have worked in AI."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted our organization by reducing error rates from around fifteen to twenty percent to just two to three percent after implementation."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by being a big money saver because before having our chatbot, the use case was that every time some of our customers needed help, they used to call a number."
"Kore.ai has positively impacted my organization by helping us build intelligent chatbots and incorporating voice agents, enabling various clients to adopt these solutions, which have been revolutionary for their businesses."
"Kore.ai offers many valuable features, particularly its extensive array of connectors, allowing easy integration with various ERP systems and the straightforward implementation of webhooks and APIs."
 

Cons

"I believe that Aisera's AI Copilot could be improved with a more simplified initial implementation."
"To improve Aisera's AI Copilot, automating the scripting would be beneficial so that it is a little bit more free-flowing and generic for the workflow because something as simple as a password reset will always have the same features."
"There are several areas for improvement. First, hallucination control: being an LLM-based system, Aisera's AI Copilot occasionally generates confident but incorrect answers."
"Kore.ai can be improved by enhancing their documentation, which is currently a bit disorganized."
"Customer support is okay, I guess. We get what we want from them whenever there is an issue or something, but sometimes when we had issues, it was delayed a lot."
"I rated Kore.ai an 8 out of 10 because additional features could be added to it."
"To improve Kore.ai, I suggest focusing on more agentic automation, such as offering MCP kind of features with an orchestration layer for use cases."
"This is a regret for me."
"The two points I deduct relate to the integrations, which were not as extensive as I initially expected."
"In support, the team is not the greatest, but it works."
"We sometimes faced challenges with the integration process due to a lack of in-depth knowledge in the documentation."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI IT Support solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
13%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Wholesaler/Distributor
8%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Construction Company
11%
Retailer
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Aisera’s AI Copilot?
There are several areas for improvement. First, hallucination control: being an LLM-based system, Aisera's AI Copilot occasionally generates confident but incorrect answers. Better guardrails a...
What is your primary use case for Aisera’s AI Copilot?
I use Aisera's AI Copilot mainly for three things: automating repeated IT support tickets, providing instant AI-powered answers to employee queries, and integrating with existing tools such as ...
What advice do you have for others considering Aisera’s AI Copilot?
I would add that in my team or my perspective, a few additional things are worth sharing. One thing that genuinely surprised me was how different team members interacted with Aisera's AI Copilo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kore.ai?
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Kore.ai is that the price is low, and the licensing is also not costly.
What needs improvement with Kore.ai?
Kore.ai could be improved by offering more in-depth trainings and assignments with the platform itself so that anyone could learn how to use it better. We sometimes faced challenges with the integr...
What is your primary use case for Kore.ai?
Kore.ai is designed to create AI chatbots for agents working with clients, integrating agents for their main duties. I completed a personal project using Kore.ai to build an agent for university ad...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Aisera’s AI Copilot
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Leading banks & Enterprise Companies
Find out what your peers are saying about Aisera Assistant vs. Kore.ai and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.