Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aerospike Cloud Managed Service vs HPE GreenLake comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aerospike Cloud Managed Ser...
Ranking in Managed Cloud Services
6th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE GreenLake
Ranking in Managed Cloud Services
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Consumption Services (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed Cloud Services category, the mindshare of Aerospike Cloud Managed Service is 4.8%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE GreenLake is 20.1%, down from 26.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed Cloud Services Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
HPE GreenLake20.1%
Aerospike Cloud Managed Service4.8%
Other75.1%
Managed Cloud Services
 

Featured Reviews

AkhileshChauhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Engineering Manager at Emids
Fast read and write performance boosts efficiency in data management
Regarding features, a couple of things stand out for me. First is definitely the read and write capabilities, which were amazing. On the storage side, another notable feature is the distributed management. Also, saving data into Aerospike in a NoSQL format is beneficial. It's not exactly buffer data; it's like free text, allowing us to create key-value pairs and fetch data using keys. This was another good feature.
HM
CEO at Cyber Internet Services (Pvt) Ltd.
Flexible monthly infrastructure has simplified management and improved client cost control
Some valuable points about HPE GreenLake are that it is a managed solution in the same pane of glass. HPE GreenLake integrates well with the existing infrastructure, and it is straightforward. HPE GreenLake positively impacts my organization because it saves money and time, and it improves my sales because I have another solution to reduce costs for the client. The client may need to pay two thousand dollars to change every infrastructure in one payment, but not all clients have the total amount available. However, if it is possible to pay month-to-month for the solution, it is much easier for the client to accept the proposal. HPE GreenLake's real-time monitoring tools are good, and I really need them to improve the services.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Saving data into Aerospike in a NoSQL format is beneficial."
"We have a service and cost model based on utilization for specific KPIs, measured by memory and storage, with no costs for CPU consumption. This approach has allowed us to manage and optimize utilization and consumption effectively."
"The biggest thing that it gives us is reportability; that's the critical component. By giving us a monthly bill that is expandable based on usage, we're able to report back to the organization on the value that we're actually getting out of the hardware platform."
"It has helped us with the planning, and in concert with this, we are doing a lot of virtualizations. For a lot of cases, we are bringing in less gear and equipment to be able to accomplish the same things. It makes better use of what we do bring in."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to grow into a lower price point at some point in time."
"The solution integrates well with Dell, Cisco switches, or other switches."
"Absolute flexibility for scaling storage needs on demand."
"HPE GreenLake is highly stable."
"Its performance is a significant improvement over the legacy stack that we had."
 

Cons

"Enhancing performance would be beneficial."
"I would like to have more detail in the monitoring."
"Both times that we've had to increase the hardware, the deployment took way longer than expected. In addition, we haven't yet gotten to a use point where the cost is below what it would cost us to provision the same set of services on HPE hardware outside of the GreenLake service."
"Unfortunately, HPE GreenLake can be sold only in Bahrain, UAE, and the Middle East, meaning it can be sold in only three or four countries because it requires certain approvals from countries where it has to be used."
"HPE GreenLake can improve by making some of the user's experience better. It can take some time to learn."
"The interconnects were a challenge originally, but they sorted that out, and It was fine. We did have to spend a bit more money."
"The support service needs improvement. The support team isn't very active in addressing cases. It should also provide a web application."
"Part of the integration, with cutting things over to Unisys, may have hurt us a bit. We had a couple of rough implementations earlier this year. Part of that was due to some internal system changes on HPE's side. We are keeping an eye on this to make sure it doesn't happen again."
"I am still struggling with monitoring, particularly with OpsRamp, which is not fully customized to our needs, especially for disaster recovery."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It's a small cost per month compared to that one-time purchase. The big thing is if you get your one-time purchase wrong, then you are buying a lot more. With GreenLake, if we miss estimate (which with all the planning, you usually don't), we sign a piece of paper, and then they send more equipment in."
"If you are looking to turn some of your capital expense into operational expense, this allows you to do it. It is a good idea."
"The price could be more flexible."
"If you're used to buying HPE servers, it's less expensive than that. I don't really compare competitor servers because HPE has never given me any reason to look otherwise. However, if you get good pricing on HPE servers, you get better pricing on GreenLake."
"Our first year costs were approximately $1.2 million instead of spending five to six million dollars."
"Right now we're paying about $180,000 per year."
"HPE GreenLake payment model is you pay for what you use. You can purchase a yearly, quarterly, or half-year license. The overall price of the solution is a little high and hopeful there can be better margins in the future."
"Pricing is based on usage plateaus. The more you use, the more you pay."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Cloud Services solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Aerospike Cloud Managed Service?
Overall, I think Aerospike Cloud Managed Service is quite good, but I believe the UI console is functional and could be made better. It's a bit technical to use, especially for some of the people i...
What is your primary use case for Aerospike Cloud Managed Service?
I typically use Aerospike Cloud Managed Service for user session management, fraud detection pipelines, and real-time data processing in our apps. The main use case revolves around real-time data t...
What advice do you have for others considering Aerospike Cloud Managed Service?
I would say overall, people should go for Aerospike Cloud Managed Service as it's a fast, reliable, and stable service, which is perfect for real-time, high-throughput workloads. The managed servic...
What do you like most about HPE GreenLake?
The solution's technical support does an excellent job.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE GreenLake?
We had a service and cost model established on utilization for specific KPIs, and we were measured by memory and storage, with no costs for CPU consumption.
What needs improvement with HPE GreenLake?
HPE GreenLake solution is very good. Another solution that really improves the offering is what HP created for its own hypervisor solution. Because VMware is very expensive right now, offering anot...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
GreenLake Flex Capacity, HPE Flexible Capacity, HPE FlexCap
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Capgemini Finland Infrastructure Services, Sogeti BeLux, Accenture
Find out what your peers are saying about Aerospike Cloud Managed Service vs. HPE GreenLake and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.