Aerospike Cloud Managed Service vs HPE GreenLake comparison

Aerospike and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Managed Cloud Services category. Aerospike is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.5. Aerospike holds a 6.3% mindshare in MCS, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 21.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aerospike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Aerospike Cloud Managed Ser...

Read 3 Aerospike Cloud Managed Service reviews

263 Views
263 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE GreenLake

Read 14 HPE GreenLake reviews

3,163 Views
696 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Aerospike Cloud Managed Ser...

HPE GreenLake

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aerospike Cloud Managed Service and HPE GreenLake based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Managed Cloud Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Aerospike Cloud Managed Service vs. HPE GreenLake Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Aerospike Cloud Managed Service vs. HPE GreenLake

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aerospike Cloud Managed Ser...

Ranking in Managed Cloud Services

6th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE GreenLake

Ranking in Managed Cloud Services

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Consumption Services (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Managed Cloud Services category, the mindshare of Aerospike Cloud Managed Service is 6.3%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE GreenLake is 21.1%, down from 30.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Cloud Services Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE GreenLake	21.1%
Aerospike Cloud Managed Service	6.3%
Other	72.6%

Managed Cloud Services

Featured Reviews

Sanooj Mananot

CEo at CloudPositive

Ultra‑low latency access has transformed how we deliver time‑critical ads and serves audience data in real time

The best features Aerospike Cloud Managed Service offers are mostly high availability and cloud flexibility because regardless of AWS and GCP, we can simply move to, we can configure Aerospike Cloud Managed Service on multi-cloud as well. Performance is the main thing, a very predictive performance, ultra-low latency at a huge scale.Aerospike Cloud Managed Service has impacted my organization positively because earlier, we were struggling to convert these ads within a limited time frame. But with Aerospike Cloud Managed Service, we are able to deliver ads more precisely and faster to the audience. So, it definitely increased the throughput, and our ad performance also increased after moving to Aerospike Cloud Managed Service.

Read full review

Heriberto Mendez Olivo

CEO at Cyber Internet Services (Pvt) Ltd.

Flexible monthly infrastructure has simplified management and improved client cost control

Some valuable points about HPE GreenLake are that it is a managed solution in the same pane of glass. HPE GreenLake integrates well with the existing infrastructure, and it is straightforward. HPE GreenLake positively impacts my organization because it saves money and time, and it improves my sales because I have another solution to reduce costs for the client. The client may need to pay two thousand dollars to change every infrastructure in one payment, but not all clients have the total amount available. However, if it is possible to pay month-to-month for the solution, it is much easier for the client to accept the proposal. HPE GreenLake's real-time monitoring tools are good, and I really need them to improve the services.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Saving data into Aerospike in a NoSQL format is beneficial."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to grow into a lower price point at some point in time."

"It has made our organization's capacity management efforts so much better. Usually, engineers need to take time to worry about firmware updates and and getting that stuff done. However, that falls to the wayside, knowing with GreenLake's data center management and data center support that all the firmware has been tested for all the equipment that you have. When you apply the updates, nothing should go wrong, because it has already been fully tested."

"We have a service and cost model based on utilization for specific KPIs, measured by memory and storage, with no costs for CPU consumption. This approach has allowed us to manage and optimize utilization and consumption effectively."

"The solution's technical support does an excellent job."

"HPE has delivered on all their promises for this service."

"Absolute flexibility for scaling storage needs on demand."

"HPE GreenLake is highly stable."

"Its performance is a significant improvement over the legacy stack that we had."

More HPE GreenLake pros

Cons

"Enhancing performance would be beneficial."

"The interconnects were a challenge originally, but they sorted that out, and It was fine. We did have to spend a bit more money."

"There could be better monitoring of growth and threshold usage so users could be more aware when their billing will change."

"Both times that we've had to increase the hardware, the deployment took way longer than expected. In addition, we haven't yet gotten to a use point where the cost is below what it would cost us to provision the same set of services on HPE hardware outside of the GreenLake service."

"There is a need for improved support in HPE GreenLake, including more administrators and engineers to provide faster resolution for issues."

"We are still managing the VMs in our IT operations."

"Part of the integration, with cutting things over to Unisys, may have hurt us a bit. We had a couple of rough implementations earlier this year. Part of that was due to some internal system changes on HPE's side. We are keeping an eye on this to make sure it doesn't happen again."

"I don't think we'll know until we get to the end of the contract if the service has saved us money."

"HPE GreenLake can improve by making some of the user's experience better. It can take some time to learn."

More HPE GreenLake cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Right now we're paying about $180,000 per year."

"If you're used to buying HPE servers, it's less expensive than that. I don't really compare competitor servers because HPE has never given me any reason to look otherwise. However, if you get good pricing on HPE servers, you get better pricing on GreenLake."

"The price could be more flexible."

"In terms of pricing, it's a bit on the higher side."

"HPE GreenLake payment model is you pay for what you use. You can purchase a yearly, quarterly, or half-year license. The overall price of the solution is a little high and hopeful there can be better margins in the future."

"Our first year costs were approximately $1.2 million instead of spending five to six million dollars."

"It's a small cost per month compared to that one-time purchase. The big thing is if you get your one-time purchase wrong, then you are buying a lot more. With GreenLake, if we miss estimate (which with all the planning, you usually don't), we sign a piece of paper, and then they send more equipment in."

"Pricing is based on usage plateaus. The more you use, the more you pay."

More HPE GreenLake pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Cloud Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Aerospike Cloud Managed Service?

Overall, I think Aerospike Cloud Managed Service is quite good, but I believe the UI console is functional and could be made better. It's a bit technical to use, especially for some of the people i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aerospike Cloud Managed Service?

I typically use Aerospike Cloud Managed Service for user session management, fraud detection pipelines, and real-time data processing in our apps. The main use case revolves around real-time data t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Aerospike Cloud Managed Service?

I would say overall, people should go for Aerospike Cloud Managed Service as it's a fast, reliable, and stable service, which is perfect for real-time, high-throughput workloads. The managed servic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE GreenLake?

We had a service and cost model established on utilization for specific KPIs, and we were measured by memory and storage, with no costs for CPU consumption.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE GreenLake?

HPE GreenLake solution is very good. Another solution that really improves the offering is what HP created for its own hypervisor solution. Because VMware is very expensive right now, offering anot...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE GreenLake?

I have dealt with HPE GreenLake for approximately one year. Initially, I offered service only, but this year, I am using it to sell HP products because the supplier in Puerto Rico, Solution Box, he...

See all answers

Comparisons

CDW Managed Cloud Services vs Aerospike Cloud Managed Service

Compared 24% of the time

CloudCheckr vs Aerospike Cloud Managed Service

Compared 23% of the time

HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) vs Aerospike Cloud Managed Service

Compared 21% of the time

Everpure Evergreen One vs Aerospike Cloud Managed Service

Compared 16% of the time

More Aerospike Cloud Managed Service Competitors

Dell APEX vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 57% of the time

Everpure Evergreen One vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 23% of the time

Cisco Open Pay vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 5% of the time

CDW Managed Cloud Services vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 3% of the time

Zadara vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 1% of the time

More HPE GreenLake Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed Cloud Services

March 2026

Download Aerospike Cloud Managed Service product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE GreenLake

March 2026

Download HPE GreenLake product report

Also Known As

No data available

GreenLake Flex Capacity, HPE Flexible Capacity, HPE FlexCap

Overview

Aerospike Cloud Managed Service is renowned for its outstanding performance and reliability in handling real-time big data applications. It is ideal for high-throughput OLTP, robust caching, and fast data retrieval for personalization across multiple sectors. Key features include strong consistency, automatic scaling, and detailed monitoring, all accessible via a user-friendly interface that boosts productivity and operational efficiency.

Aerospike

Flexible Capacity from HPE Pointnext offers on-demand capacity, combining the agility and economics of public cloud with the security and performance of on-premises IT. With advanced metering, customers pay monthly for actual capacity used, above a minimum commitment – by core, by terabyte, by virtual machine – with no up-front capital outlay. HPE provides a buffer of capacity on-premises and ready for use, which you pay for only when you start to use. Active capacity management ensures that the buffer is replenished before it runs out, so that you have the servers, storage, networking, and operating software that you need, and ensuring that you are ready to take on your next project or next customer. Flexible Capacity cuts overprovisioning – commonly as much as 50-60% of servers and storage – saving on IT cost, enabling faster time to value and eliminating the typical long purchasing cycle. And it includes support for your IT environment to simplify how you operate IT.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Capgemini Finland Infrastructure Services, Sogeti BeLux, Accenture

Buyer's Guide

Aerospike Cloud Managed Service vs. HPE GreenLake

February 2026

Free Report: Aerospike Cloud Managed Service vs. HPE GreenLake

Find out what your peers are saying about Aerospike Cloud Managed Service vs. HPE GreenLake and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aerospike Cloud Managed Service vs. HPE GreenLake report.

See our list of best Managed Cloud Services vendors.

We monitor all Managed Cloud Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.