ADONIS vs OpenText Process Automation comparison

BOC Group and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BOC Group is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.5. BOC Group holds a 1.6% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

ADONIS

Read 8 ADONIS reviews

2,763 Views
2,680 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Process Automation

Read 10 OpenText Process Automation reviews

2,108 Views
1,750 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ADONIS

OpenText Process Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

ADONIS and OpenText Process Automation compete in streamlining business processes. ADONIS gains an edge in pricing and support satisfaction, while OpenText Process Automation is preferred for its advanced features.

Features:ADONIS offers effective process modeling, analysis tools, and process documentation capabilities, enabling efficient process optimization. OpenText Process Automation provides robust integration capabilities, scalability, and comprehensive automation solutions, suited for complex enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement:ADONIS could enhance its scalability, integration features, and expand its automation capabilities for complex projects. OpenText Process Automation could improve user-friendliness, streamline its deployment process further, and refine its analytics engine for more intuitive insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:ADONIS features straightforward deployment and effective technical support for quick implementation. OpenText Process Automation ensures efficient deployment with strong integration potential for seamless transitions, supported by resources tailored for complex organizational requirements.

Pricing and ROI:ADONIS is recognized for competitive pricing and a rapid return on investment, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. OpenText Process Automation, despite a higher initial setup cost, offers a substantial ROI over time through its advanced functionality and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Process Automation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 1.6%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Process Automation is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ADONIS	1.6%
OpenText Process Automation	1.2%
Other	97.2%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Teguh Surya

AVP B2B Business Process Excellence at PT. Indosat Tbk

Process capabilities impress while user setup requires streamlining

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business processes. We also plan to integrate with UiPath because currently, we are focusing on task automations, not process orchestrations. In the future, we plan to implement process orchestrations. I see that Camunda can integrate UiPath into the process, process model, and process integrations. ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks are the BPM modules. There is the standard BPM modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."

"It's a very complete solution."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."

"This is a good solution for consulting firms and universities and is one of the best systems for analytics of business processes."

"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"The process modeling interface of ADONIS is very comprehensive, being more complete than Camunda in terms of process documentation and process components such as risks, KPI, and other process components, making it excellent for process documentation, compliance, and repository."

More ADONIS pros

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

"The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

More OpenText Process Automation pros

Cons

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."

"This solution would be more scalable for our business if we could make certain changes, including adding the Russian language."

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."

"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."

"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

More ADONIS cons

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

"The UI for the solution is complex, and it would be better to go for Openpath and Angular or use another BPM engine."

"The integration could improve."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

More OpenText Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"The price is on the higher side."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ADONIS?

I have not integrated it with other products in my system because we are just using the free version. I am planning to purchase the Team version or Business plan for the initial proof of concept pr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpenText AppWorks?

We primarily use OpenText AppWorks ( /products/opentext-appworks-reviews ) for automating supply chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have our own product...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Compared 19% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 13% of the time

Camunda vs ADONIS

Compared 10% of the time

ARIS Process Governance vs ADONIS

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 7% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

Appian vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Camunda vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

May 2026

Download ADONIS product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Process Automation

April 2026

Download OpenText Process Automation product report

Overview

ADONIS is a stable, scalable platform supporting business process management with features for modeling, process accessibility, and decision-making. Known for its comprehensive nature, it aids in clear process documentation and robust support.

ADONIS provides a versatile BPM suite that empowers organizations in process mapping and modeling. It supports collaboration and offers user-friendly simulations, aiding decision-making with insights for automation. Despite lacking 24/7 support and limited export features, ADONIS is integral for creating documentation and conducting workshops. Challenges include complex setup and administrator management, but its comprehensive features support learning in academic settings and deployment by consultants.

What are the key features of ADONIS?

Personalized View: Provides easy access to processes.
Drag-and-Drop Modeling: Simplifies process modeling.
Robust Analytics: Offers strong insights into business processes.
Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork across platforms.
Simulation Features: Aids in user-friendly process simulations.
Documentation Support: Includes features for risks and KPIs.

What benefits can users expect from ADONIS reviews?

Ease of Use: Consistently highlighted for its straightforward interface.
Comprehensive Nature: Surpasses alternatives in process documentation.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs.
Robust Support: Reliable customer support services.

In specific industries, ADONIS is used for versatile purposes like business process management, modeling, academic learning, and consultancy deployment. Organizations engage with ADONIS in both active and read-only modes, highlighting its adaptability in diverse settings.

BOC Group

OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.

OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.

What are the key features?

Low-Code Development: Enables user-friendly development and faster deployment.
Third-Party Integration: Works well with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
OCR Technology: Streamlines processes by enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.
Dynamic Case Management: Adapts to complex workflows and changing conditions.
Centralized Architecture: Integrates multiple tools, streamlining operations.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs through process optimization.
Scalability: Grows alongside organizational demands without performance loss.
Reliability: Offers stable operations with robust support.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly links with existing systems to enhance functionality.

OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation

April 2026

Free Report: ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.