ADONIS vs OpenText Process Automation comparison

BOC Group and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BOC Group is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7. BOC Group holds a 2.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

ADONIS

Read 8 ADONIS reviews

2,232 Views
2,165 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Process Automation

Read 10 OpenText Process Automation reviews

797 Views
470 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ADONIS

OpenText Process Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

ADONIS and OpenText Process Automation are competitive products in business process management. ADONIS excels in user-friendliness while OpenText Process Automation provides extensive features and scalability, suggesting the latter's advantage for larger enterprises.

Features: ADONIS provides intuitive process modeling, team collaboration capabilities, and integrated analytics. OpenText Process Automation offers advanced process integration, sophisticated reporting features, and robust monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ADONIS could enhance low-code capabilities, expand its automation features, and improve integration with third-party systems. OpenText Process Automation may benefit from simplifying its deployment complexity, expanding user-friendly features, and reducing costs for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ADONIS is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, ideal for smaller businesses with limited technical resources. OpenText Process Automation caters to larger deployments with extensive customization and professional support services, designed for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: ADONIS offers cost-effectiveness and low upfront expenses, providing attractive ROI for small to mid-sized businesses. OpenText Process Automation has higher setup costs, justified by significant value for organizations leveraging its comprehensive features, making it suitable for enterprises seeking sophisticated capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Process Automation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 2.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Process Automation is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Process Automation	0.7%
ADONIS	2.7%
Other	96.6%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Teguh Surya

AVP B2B Business Process Excellence at PT. Indosat Tbk

Process capabilities impress while user setup requires streamlining

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business processes. We also plan to integrate with UiPath because currently, we are focusing on task automations, not process orchestrations. In the future, we plan to implement process orchestrations. I see that Camunda can integrate UiPath into the process, process model, and process integrations. ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks are the BPM modules. There is the standard BPM modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a very complete solution."

"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."

"The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

"We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required."

More OpenText Process Automation pros

Cons

"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."

"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."

"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."

"ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users."

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"The integration could improve."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

More OpenText Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"The price is on the higher side."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Energy/Utilities Company

Insurance Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ADONIS?

It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop

See all answers

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?

We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Compared 25% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 20% of the time

Camunda vs ADONIS

Compared 19% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 9% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs ADONIS

Compared 6% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

Camunda vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 26% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 18% of the time

Appian vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 18% of the time

Mendix vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 12% of the time

OutSystems vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download ADONIS product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Process Automation

September 2025

Download OpenText Process Automation product report

Overview

ADONIS BPM suite is users' best-rated tool for process management, analysis and optimization, trusted by SMEs and large corporations worldwide. It helps you transform your business and create competitive advantage by streamlining processes, enhancing operational efficiency, boosting transparency and creating a customer-centric organization. You can start creating your digital twin with ADONIS already today, as the cloud-based ADONIS:Community Edition is available for free. For more information please visit www.boc-group.com/en/adonis/.

BOC Group

OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.

OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.

What are the key features?

Low-Code Development: Enables user-friendly development and faster deployment.
Third-Party Integration: Works well with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
OCR Technology: Streamlines processes by enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.
Dynamic Case Management: Adapts to complex workflows and changing conditions.
Centralized Architecture: Integrates multiple tools, streamlining operations.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs through process optimization.
Scalability: Grows alongside organizational demands without performance loss.
Reliability: Offers stable operations with robust support.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly links with existing systems to enhance functionality.

OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation

September 2025

Free Report: ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADONIS vs. OpenText Process Automation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.