Adobe Workfront and Box compete in project management and file storage. Workfront often leads in project management features, while Box dominates in document management and collaboration.
Features: Adobe Workfront's valuable features include advanced project tracking, resource management, and robust reporting capabilities. Box offers seamless document storage, easy sharing, and integrations with numerous third-party applications.
Room for Improvement: Adobe Workfront could improve with more intuitive user interfaces and enhanced mobile access. It may also benefit from better integration with niche software products. Box would gain from offering more advanced project management tools, enhanced offline document editing, and expanded customization options for enterprise customers.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront offers comprehensive customer support with extensive customization options during deployment, allowing for a tailored project management experience. Box provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment, making it easily accessible for quick adoption, alongside reliable support.
Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront requires a more substantial initial setup cost, reflecting its advanced project management capabilities. Box presents a cost-effective solution with a lower initial investment, focusing on collaboration and document management. The ROI for Workfront is tied to its functionalities for large organizations, while Box offers scalability and cost savings for businesses with document management priorities.
We tracked all of the savings through Adobe Workfront, and at the end of the year, for those 2,500 users, we saved over 1,200 hours, or 1,200 man hours.
They provide answers and guidance on how to resolve issues, such as clearing cookies and cache, and assist in best practice configuration and optimization of the platform.
It is considered a citizen admin system, and you don't need to be an IT professional to be an administrator.
If L5 does not understand, it moves to L4. If they can't solve it, it moves to a higher level.
We have gone from two or three marketing teams up to over 40 marketing teams and 6,500 users in a few years.
The solution is really scalable.
I am uncertain about its effectiveness at an enterprise level, where SharePoint might be preferred.
Adobe Workfront provides a stable foundation for project management.
Overall, I would rate the stability and reliability of Adobe Workfront a ten.
I have not faced any challenges with the stability of Adobe Workfront.
Box was very stable and did not have any latency issues.
We can enhance integrations, such as ensuring Adobe Workfront integrates more seamlessly with other Adobe products like Experience Manager and Creative Cloud.
If I have issue-level data and project-level data that I need to see, with some custom coding, you can do some of it in a report, but in general, if you have a lot of that blended data between levels, you need to use a dashboard, which requires two different reports due to the difficulty in pulling data at the different levels into one thing.
Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems.
Collaborative editing was challenging if multiple people were in a document at once.
This can include items such as mileage, supplies, software, licenses, and travel costs.
The per-user cost in the ultimate plan of Adobe Workfront is approximately $1,232 when purchasing 800 to 1,000 licenses.
It provides comprehensive features with built-in integration for creative tools, addressing the pain point of creative collaboration in the content supply chain.
Reporting is a major part of Adobe Workfront, making it not just a workflow management tool but also a tool where we can get data and present it to executives through comprehensive reporting.
The system aids in supporting demand management and producing high-level status reports.
Box had a very easy-to-use search feature and a good user interface on its website, which was faster and better than SharePoint.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Adobe Workfront | 9.9% |
Box | 6.6% |
Other | 83.5% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 8 |
Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
Large Enterprise | 30 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 16 |
Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
Large Enterprise | 27 |
AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.
Box is a Modern Content Management Platform for companies of all sizes and industries. The difference that Box brings is that it offers the security and controls admins need with the sharing and collaboration capabilities end users want. Box has made it easier for people to securely share ideas, collaborate and get work done faster. Today, more than 62,000 businesses, including 59% of the Fortune 500, trust Box to manage content in the cloud.
The Box platform provides HIPAA, FINRA, FedRAMP, and many other compliances to go with granular access permissions and advanced security capabilities.
By using Box you can sync, share, and collaborate on all types of files, anywhere, on any device - but that's just the beginning. You can choose where to store your data, to manage your own encryption keys, and set workflows to automate content-based processes. You can also assign custom metadata tags to content, watermark sensitive content, and set file retention or legal hold policies.
Box has deep, native integrations with Microsoft Office and Outlook, Google Apps for Work, Salesforce, Netsuite, Docusign, Adobe, and many other best-of-breed solutions you may already be using.
We monitor all Digital Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.