Acunetix vs Digital.ai Application Security comparison

"The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment."

"The product is really easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours."

"The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities."

"It comes equipped with an internal applicator, which automatically identifies and addresses vulnerabilities within the program."

"It's very user-friendly for the testing teams. It's very easy for them to understand things and to fix vulnerabilities."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."

"The only problem that they have is the price. It is a bit expensive, and you cannot change the number of applications for the whole year."

"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."

"The pricing is a bit on the higher side."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"Acunetix needs to include agent analysis."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us."

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"The price is exceptionally high."