Acunetix vs Digital.ai Application Security comparison

"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."

"The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities."

"The usability and overall scan results are good."

"It has been able to find some vulnerabilities, and we've been able to remediate our websites and vulnerabilities, thanks to Acunetix."

"Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick."

"As a team, it's helped us to deliver better security assessments."

"It comes equipped with an internal applicator, which automatically identifies and addresses vulnerabilities within the program."

"We are happy, we're not unhappy with Acunetix, but we are very impressed by some of the things that it has been doing."

"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."

"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."

"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched."

"Acunetix needs to improve its cost."

"I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution."

"Acunetix needs to include agent analysis."

"I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"The pricing is a bit on the higher side."

"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The solution is expensive."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."