ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Tray.io comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Tray.io are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.5, while Tray.io is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.3. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 1.2% mindshare in PA, compared to Tray.io’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tray.io users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 37 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

3,801 Views
1,102 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tray.io

Read 3 Tray.io reviews

1,635 Views
474 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Tray.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ActiveBatch by Redwood and Tray.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Tray.io Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Tray.io

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

22nd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (14th), Workload Automation (14th)

Tray.io

Ranking in Process Automation

29th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (22nd), Low-Code Development Platforms (27th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ActiveBatch by Redwood	1.2%
Tray.io	0.8%
Other	98.0%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Abdul_Samad

Application Administrator Lead at Bluestem

Manages thousands of jobs daily and reduces downtime through secondary node support

The current feedback I receive from my end users regarding ActiveBatch by Redwood highlights issues with the tabs or panes during job modification. When the next user monitors it, they need to close the pane or job and reopen it to see the changes reflected. If the end user makes an update, it will not be visible unless they start from the beginning again. Implementing a refresh button would be helpful for real-time updates when the end user needs to see changes immediately. We currently face issues with the web console of ActiveBatch by Redwood. When users operate through an RDP session, every user has their own ActiveBatch by Redwood application. However, on the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs. This issue is only present on the web console, as the application itself works without any problems. ActiveBatch by Redwood can be improved by adding more features, as we are not currently handling cloud-based applications like S3 buckets and Azure. Connecting to these cloud platforms would be a helpful enhancement.

Read full review

Samuele Sois

Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Marketing A/B tests have gained deeper insights from user behavior and unified global reporting

The best features Tray.io offers include excellent visualization capabilities and a dashboard, which stand out to me the most. I appreciate that it is very easy to convert the data we receive from Tray.io into dashboards from Power BI, which is extremely useful. I would also appreciate if in the future Tray.io provides a way to natively convert the data to Tableau. Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once. As a multinational and very large company, it is definitely beneficial that those of us in the UK can use the same format that colleagues use in India, and the entire data architecture is framed within a trusted system from an established organization. As far as I know, Tray.io has been operating for the last 12 years, making it a very reliable system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is its stability. We've only had very minor issues and generally they have happened because someone has applied a patch on a Windows operating system and it has caused some grief. We've actually been able to resolve those issues quite quickly with ActiveBatch. In all the time that I've had use of ActiveBatch, it hasn't failed completely once. Uptime is almost 100 percent."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is the versatility of the prebuilt jobs."

"For developers, it is easy to orchestrate the workflows and the integration has been very easy."

"The central automation hub for scheduling and monitoring brings everything together under a single pane of glass by streamlining everything: It takes less time to run everything, it's less expensive because we no longer have the extra operator running jobs, there is less chance of an operator clicking the wrong button because we run both a test system and production system side by side, and it automatically will send an output where it needs to go in real-time."

"Using this tool, if there are any huge failures, we immediately get an email notification, and the proper team will be informed, at which time they can act accordingly."

"ActiveBatch has reduced work by providing automated workflows across several different applications."

"We are able to integrate it into multiple third-party tools like email, backup, tracking systems, SharePoint, Slack alerts, etc."

"Over the years that I have used this, it has probably saved us several hundred hours of development time for other teams and my own."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by reducing the amount of redundant tasks that our team performs by approximately 80%, and the numbers are quite significant with the workflows alone, as we are working towards creating and utilizing AI within these workflows as well."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping us keep our internal database and this third-party service in sync, and it has really helped us automate a lot of that work because it is fairly straightforward to maintain and develop."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once."

Cons

"I can't get the cleaning up of logs to work consistently. Right now, we are not setup correctly, and maybe it is something that I have not effectively communicated to them."

"A cloud option is not provided as a free feature, making it a costly solution for smaller organizations."

"Any product is going to have some room for improvement, no matter what. I see the company has already ventured into AWS and they're constantly trying to improve the managed file transfer which they have recently improvised. I think they bought a software called JSCAPE and they're trying to improve it, which is good. I am not sure if JSCAPE would be part of the base product but currently, you have to buy a separate license for it, which doesn't make sense. If it was Microsoft, ServiceNow, or integrating with other software vendors, I would understand but JSCAPE is now in-house and I'm not sure if they can justify having a separate license for JSCAPE. I would probably expect them to be packaging JSCAPE into the base product. They did switch over from a perpetual license model to a subscription model, which hurt the company a little bit. Nobody is offering the perpetual model anymore. As long as the transition is fair for both the companies, I think it should be fine and not burn us out."

"The thing I've noticed the most is the Help function. It's very difficult, at times, to find examples of how to do something. The Help function will explain what the tool does, but we're not a Windows shop at the data warehouse. Our data warehouse jobs actually run on Linux servers. Finding things for Linux-based solutions is not as easy as it is for Windows-based solutions. I would like to see more examples, and more non-Windows examples as well, in the Help."

"Except for the GUI, everything looks good."

"They have some crucial design flaws within the console that still need to be worked out because it is not working exactly how we hoped to see it, e.g., just some minor things where when you hit the save button, then all of a sudden all your job's library items collapse. Then, in order to continue on with your testing, you have to open those back up. I have taken that to them, and they are like, "Yep. We know about it. We know we have some enhancements that need to be taken care of. We have more developers now." They are working towards taking the minor things that annoy us, resolving them, and getting them fixed."

"Some improvements can be made to the user interface."

"The help center and documentation are not that helpful."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"As our product got more complex, we needed to add more and more complexity to Tray.io in terms of our setup, and that is when the benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated."

"I have found that the error management in my main use case with Tray.io is not as effective as we would prefer."

"One way Tray.io could be improved, especially for people coming in with no real coding experience, is with more comprehensive error messages."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	47

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ActiveBatch by Redwood has been great; we recently renewed our license, and it was a smooth process without any issues.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I believe ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved because the UI could be modernized.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

My main use case for ActiveBatch by Redwood is file processing. I use ActiveBatch by Redwood for file processing for debit card transactions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tray.io?

I believe Tray.io can be improved by offering integration with Tableau, which is still not available. I rated it an eight because there are still some things that can be improved, as I mentioned be...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tray.io?

My main use case for Tray.io is to conduct A/B testing for marketing initiatives that the company has undertaken. We test the deployment of different campaigns across similar cohorts and evaluate w...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?

My advice to others considering Tray.io is to trust the process because once the installation is complete, it is extremely easy to deploy and set up. I have rated this product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 11% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 7% of the time

VisualCron vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 6% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 6% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 5% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

Zapier vs Tray.io

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Tray.io

Compared 12% of the time

SnapLogic vs Tray.io

Compared 11% of the time

Workato vs Tray.io

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs Tray.io

Compared 9% of the time

More Tray.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

May 2026

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Tray.io

April 2026

Download Tray.io product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Tray.io is an advanced integration platform that allows seamless connectivity between applications, designed to automate workflows and streamline business processes.

Tray.io provides an extensive library of pre-built connectors and powerful automation tools, making it easy for businesses to boost efficiency. Its drag-and-drop workflow builder enables integration without code, catering to both technical and non-technical users. Being highly customizable and scalable, Tray.io helps companies adapt quickly to changing requirements, ensuring smooth operations and effective data management.

What are the key features of Tray.io?

Visual Workflow Builder: Offers an intuitive drag-and-drop interface for easy workflow creation.
Pre-built Connectors: Extensive library allowing quick integration with popular apps and services.
Customizable Logic: Lets users define conditions and logic that fit their business needs.
Scalability: Supports growing volumes and complex automations smoothly.
Error Handling: Efficiently detects and manages errors within workflows.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Automates routine tasks, freeing up resources for strategic activities.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces operational costs through smart automation.
Flexibility: Adapts to business-specific processes and changes in scale.
Reduced Development Time: Saves time with no-code integrations and pre-built connectors.

Tray.io is utilized across diverse industries such as e-commerce, where it integrates order management systems to provide seamless customer experiences. In marketing, it connects CRM platforms to enhance lead nurturing. In finance, it streamlines data flow between accounting software, improving financial reporting accuracy.

Tray.io

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Tray.io

April 2026

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Tray.io

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Tray.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Tray.io report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.