ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Tray.io comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Tray.io are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.5, while Tray.io is ranked #55. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 1.1% mindshare in PA, compared to Tray.io’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tray.io users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 37 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

2,744 Views
796 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tray.io

Read 3 Tray.io reviews

826 Views
223 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Tray.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ActiveBatch by Redwood and Tray.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

26th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (15th), Workload Automation (14th)

Tray.io

Ranking in Process Automation

55th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (30th), Low-Code Development Platforms (74th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ActiveBatch by Redwood	1.1%
Tray.io	0.5%
Other	98.4%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Abdul_Samad

Application Administrator Lead at Bluestem

Manages thousands of jobs daily and reduces downtime through secondary node support

The current feedback I receive from my end users regarding ActiveBatch by Redwood highlights issues with the tabs or panes during job modification. When the next user monitors it, they need to close the pane or job and reopen it to see the changes reflected. If the end user makes an update, it will not be visible unless they start from the beginning again. Implementing a refresh button would be helpful for real-time updates when the end user needs to see changes immediately. We currently face issues with the web console of ActiveBatch by Redwood. When users operate through an RDP session, every user has their own ActiveBatch by Redwood application. However, on the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs. This issue is only present on the web console, as the application itself works without any problems. ActiveBatch by Redwood can be improved by adding more features, as we are not currently handling cloud-based applications like S3 buckets and Azure. Connecting to these cloud platforms would be a helpful enhancement.

Read full review

Samuele Sois

Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Marketing A/B tests have gained deeper insights from user behavior and unified global reporting

The best features Tray.io offers include excellent visualization capabilities and a dashboard, which stand out to me the most. I appreciate that it is very easy to convert the data we receive from Tray.io into dashboards from Power BI, which is extremely useful. I would also appreciate if in the future Tray.io provides a way to natively convert the data to Tableau. Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once. As a multinational and very large company, it is definitely beneficial that those of us in the UK can use the same format that colleagues use in India, and the entire data architecture is framed within a trusted system from an established organization. As far as I know, Tray.io has been operating for the last 12 years, making it a very reliable system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ActiveBatch has reduced work by providing automated workflows across several different applications."

"ActiveBatch provides summary reports and logs for further analysis and improvements in monitoring servers, which is very handy."

"Since we are no longer waiting for an operator to see that a job is finished, we have changed our daily cycle from running in eight hours down to about five. We had a third shift-operator retire and that position was never refilled."

"Approximately ~20 hours of manual effort have been reduced to ~5 hours with the help of ActiveBatch."

"Since I started using this product, I have been able to easily track everything as it mainly monitors, alerts, and looks after all the services - even across platform scheduling - which has helped me immensely."

"Using this tool, if there are any huge failures, we immediately get an email notification, and the proper team will be informed, at which time they can act accordingly."

"Overall, it has helped to improve workflow completion times by 70 to 80 percent, easily."

"It has improved our workflow completion rates by five hours per day, because we execute our workflows daily."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by reducing the amount of redundant tasks that our team performs by approximately 80%, and the numbers are quite significant with the workflows alone, as we are working towards creating and utilizing AI within these workflows as well."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping us keep our internal database and this third-party service in sync, and it has really helped us automate a lot of that work because it is fairly straightforward to maintain and develop."

"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once."

Cons

"The interface is not that user-friendly and is a little tough to navigate."

"The thing I've noticed the most is the Help function. It's very difficult, at times, to find examples of how to do something. The Help function will explain what the tool does, but we're not a Windows shop at the data warehouse. Our data warehouse jobs actually run on Linux servers. Finding things for Linux-based solutions is not as easy as it is for Windows-based solutions. I would like to see more examples, and more non-Windows examples as well, in the Help."

"The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application."

"Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referring to the documents."

"The user interface can be improved so that it is more appealing and accessible to new users."

"Setting up the software was hard."

"There is this back and forth, where ActiveBatch says, "Your Oracle people should be dealing with this," and Oracle people say, "No, we don't know anything about ActiveBatch." Then, it all falls back on me as to what happens. Nobody is taking responsibility. This is the biggest failing for ActiveBatch."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"As our product got more complex, we needed to add more and more complexity to Tray.io in terms of our setup, and that is when the benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated."

"I have found that the error management in my main use case with Tray.io is not as effective as we would prefer."

"One way Tray.io could be improved, especially for people coming in with no real coding experience, is with more comprehensive error messages."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

13%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	47

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ActiveBatch by Redwood has been great; we recently renewed our license, and it was a smooth process without any issues.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I believe ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved because the UI could be modernized.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

My main use case for ActiveBatch by Redwood is file processing. I use ActiveBatch by Redwood for file processing for debit card transactions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tray.io?

It was not always easy to test our changes in Tray.io. In a software engineering context, you might imagine there being different branches and different environments to make changes where you can m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tray.io?

We run automation workflows with Tray.io to take data from our internal databases and update a third-party software that we use. Specifically, my company offers digital trade credit, and we use tha...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?

I think in general it has been a positive experience with Tray.io, and while there are areas where it can be improved, overall it is a good product. I rate Tray.io a seven out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 13% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 7% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 6% of the time

VisualCron vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 5% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

Zapier vs Tray.io

Compared 19% of the time

Workato vs Tray.io

Compared 12% of the time

SnapLogic vs Tray.io

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs Tray.io

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Tray.io

Compared 10% of the time

More Tray.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

March 2026

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

March 2026

Download Tray.io product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

The Tray Platform is the leading General Automation Platform, whose modern, serverless architecture empowers users to take full control of their data by automating mission-critical processes and integrating their entire tech stack.

Tray.io

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.