ActiveBatch by Redwood vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #34, while IBM is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.8% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

1,943 Views
486 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Read 6 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews

243 Views
243 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and ActiveBatch by Redwood compete in business process management and automation. ActiveBatch by Redwood appears to have the upper hand thanks to its robust feature set, extensive automation capabilities, and integration flexibility.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS offers process integration, scalability, and lifecycle management. ActiveBatch by Redwood provides robust automation tools, integration flexibility, and end-to-end workflow visibility.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could improve in simplifying deployment, enhancing user interface, and increasing flexibility. ActiveBatch by Redwood may benefit from more intuitive navigation, streamlined support for complex workflows, and reduced setup time for advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere BPMS features a complex deployment requiring significant initial setup. ActiveBatch by Redwood offers straightforward deployment with user-friendly configuration and efficient customer service, making it more accessible.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS is cost-effective with decent ROI suitable for large enterprises. ActiveBatch by Redwood, though having higher initial costs, delivers superior ROI through its advanced features and automation efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

34th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (18th), Workload Automation (19th)

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Ranking in Process Automation

27th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM WebSphere BPMS	0.3%
ActiveBatch by Redwood	0.8%
Other	98.9%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

ChandraBollini

Software Engineer at Wipro Technologies

Developers gain flexibility to build custom controls with numerous integration options

Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases. Regarding AI-driven process optimizations, we have not implemented these features with IBM WebSphere BPMS. In recent versions, IBM has introduced some generative AI features, and we plan to migrate to the newer versions within approximately one year.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It can connect to a number of third-party/legacy systems."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to trigger workflows, one after another, based on success, without having to worry about overlapping workflows. The ability to integrate our BI, analytics, and our data quality jobs is also valuable"

"The automation feature is a very valuable feature as the associates do not have to worry about performing repetitive tasks (i.e. endpoint security scans on a daily basis) that would take several hours to complete on a daily basis."

"We are able to integrate it into multiple third-party tools like email, backup, tracking systems, SharePoint, Slack alerts, etc."

"For developers, it is easy to orchestrate the workflows and the integration has been very easy."

"Since I started using this product, I have been able to easily track everything as it mainly monitors, alerts, and looks after all the services - even across platform scheduling - which has helped me immensely."

"ActiveBatch has reduced work by providing automated workflows across several different applications."

"Error Handling is one of the best standout features of ActiveBatch."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."

"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."

"IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component."

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."

Cons

"ActiveBatch is a little complex."

"An area for improvement in ActiveBatch Workload Automation is its interface or GUI. It could be a little better. There isn't any additional feature I'd like to see in the tool, except for the GUI, everything looks good."

"Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referring to the documents."

"A cloud option is not provided as a free feature, making it a costly solution for smaller organizations."

"They have some crucial design flaws within the console that still need to be worked out because it is not working exactly how we hoped to see it, e.g., just some minor things where when you hit the save button, then all of a sudden all your job's library items collapse. Then, in order to continue on with your testing, you have to open those back up. I have taken that to them, and they are like, "Yep. We know about it. We know we have some enhancements that need to be taken care of. We have more developers now." They are working towards taking the minor things that annoy us, resolving them, and getting them fixed."

"The help center and documentation are not that helpful."

"Some improvements can be made to the user interface."

"There are very few documents that provide us with detailed information on the troubleshooting of errors that occur during integration with the existing environment."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

"The solution lacks acceptable stability."

"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."

"Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?

IBM WebSphere BPMS allows users to build workflows and dashboards. It is a developer-friendly product. The product features a great UI interface that is mobile-friendly, tab-friendly, and desktop-f...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?

Understanding the benefits and improvements that come with using the product is essential. IBM WebSphere BPMS is performing excellently, and I do not see any significant areas requiring improvement...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 16% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 13% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

October 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere BPMS

September 2025

Download IBM WebSphere BPMS product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

WebSphere BPMS

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Information not available

IBM

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

September 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.