Actional vs OpenText Diagnostics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
183 views|145 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
580 views|392 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and OpenText Diagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Actional vs. OpenText Diagnostics Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
183
Comparisons
145
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
580
Comparisons
392
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
374
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.
Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.
Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
BSkyB, Alior Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company9%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
Actional vs. OpenText Diagnostics
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. OpenText Diagnostics and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
770,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Actional is ranked 75th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Diagnostics is ranked 35th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews. Actional is rated 9.0, while OpenText Diagnostics is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Diagnostics writes "Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training". Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas OpenText Diagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace and Accedian Skylight. See our Actional vs. OpenText Diagnostics report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.