IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

AccessData Group Summation [EOL] vs LexisNexis Concordance Classic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Unranked
In eDiscovery
15th
out of 36 in eDiscovery
Views
321
Comparisons
247
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Google, IBM and others in eDiscovery. Updated: July 2022.
620,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Summation
Concordance Classic
Learn More
Overview
Litigation software that stores accurate data to be presented in trials, and save money by automating data storage
LexisNexis Concordance Desktop gives you more control over your cases by handling a heavier workload and enables you to perform near-native review and native document redaction, produce color or grayscale productions, perform bulk printing and use advanced production capabilities. It provides a multi-core, hyper-threaded import engine allows users to work on other things while they import data and provides a streamline review process by facilitating access of their database with co-counsel, expert witness and more without the need of their own license. The admin console allows administrators better insight into and control over databases and administrative tasks which provides teams more flexibility and it includes an intuitive search engines in litigation, so you can pinpoint key evidence. Concordance Desktop software accommodates 12 megabytes of data per field and It can handle a million records per database and can search up to 128 databases at one time. It has a multinational cases with Unicode foreign character language support. Easily work with documents in Chinese, Russian, Japanese, Arabic, Korean and Greek, as well as many European languages.
Offer
Learn more about AccessData Group Summation [EOL]
Learn more about LexisNexis Concordance Classic
Sample Customers
Archer & Greiner, Bassi Edlin Huie & Blum, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Solomon Ward, AD Triage, Dorsey & Whitney, Shipman & Goodwin,
Paralegal Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming & Fitzgerald L.L.P.
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Government13%
Legal Firm11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise62%
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Google, IBM and others in eDiscovery. Updated: July 2022.
620,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AccessData Group Summation [EOL] is ranked unranked in eDiscovery while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is ranked 15th in eDiscovery. AccessData Group Summation [EOL] is rated 0.0, while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AccessData Group Summation [EOL] is most compared with , whereas LexisNexis Concordance Classic is most compared with LAW PreDiscovery, IPRO and Commvault Complete Data Protection.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.