We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

IPRO vs LexisNexis Concordance Classic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IPRO Logo
274 views|223 comparisons
LexisNexis Concordance Classic Logo
358 views|288 comparisons
Ranking
17th
out of 36 in eDiscovery
Views
274
Comparisons
223
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
14th
out of 36 in eDiscovery
Views
358
Comparisons
288
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Google, IBM and others in eDiscovery. Updated: January 2022.
564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Concordance Classic
Learn More
IPRO
Video Not Available
Overview
Generate custom group insurance proposals from any computer via the internet.
LexisNexis Concordance Desktop gives you more control over your cases by handling a heavier workload and enables you to perform near-native review and native document redaction, produce color or grayscale productions, perform bulk printing and use advanced production capabilities. It provides a multi-core, hyper-threaded import engine allows users to work on other things while they import data and provides a streamline review process by facilitating access of their database with co-counsel, expert witness and more without the need of their own license. The admin console allows administrators better insight into and control over databases and administrative tasks which provides teams more flexibility and it includes an intuitive search engines in litigation, so you can pinpoint key evidence. Concordance Desktop software accommodates 12 megabytes of data per field and It can handle a million records per database and can search up to 128 databases at one time. It has a multinational cases with Unicode foreign character language support. Easily work with documents in Chinese, Russian, Japanese, Arabic, Korean and Greek, as well as many European languages.
Offer
Learn more about IPRO
Learn more about LexisNexis Concordance Classic
Sample Customers
Polsinelli Shughart, doeLegal, Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog, ProSearch Strategies, Levi and Korsinsky LLP, Commonwealth Legal, Manning Curtis, Shephard Data Services, Keating Meuthing & Klekamp PLL, Berger Singerman, Porter Wright, Yarmuth Wilsdon
Paralegal Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming & Fitzgerald L.L.P.
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Legal Firm16%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Google, IBM and others in eDiscovery. Updated: January 2022.
564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IPRO is ranked 17th in eDiscovery while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is ranked 14th in eDiscovery. IPRO is rated 0.0, while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IPRO is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery and LAW PreDiscovery, whereas LexisNexis Concordance Classic is most compared with LAW PreDiscovery, kCura Relativity and Commvault.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.