1NCE vs ClickHouse comparison

The compared 1NCE and ClickHouse solutions aren't in the same category. 1NCE is ranked #9 in IC , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 2.9% mindshare in the category. ClickHouse is ranked #3 in OSD , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of 1NCE users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ClickHouse users who would recommend it.

1NCE

Read 1 1NCE review

1,107 Views
44 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ClickHouse

Read 21 ClickHouse reviews

6,154 Views
3,077 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

1NCE

ClickHouse

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

1NCE and ClickHouse cater to different technological domains—IoT connectivity and database management, respectively. 1NCE's competitive pricing and ease of integration give it an edge for IoT solutions, whereas ClickHouse's advanced database capabilities offer superior value for complex analytical needs.

Features:1NCE focuses on global IoT connectivity with features like automated network switching, cost-efficient plans, and seamless integration. ClickHouse offers rapid query processing, real-time data ingestion, and robust analytics, catering to demanding database performance requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:1NCE provides straightforward deployment with an emphasis on simplicity and a comprehensive service package. ClickHouse demands more technical expertise but offers flexible configurations and strong community support.

Pricing and ROI:1NCE provides transparent pricing that's appealing for large-scale IoT operations, ensuring quick returns. ClickHouse, as an open-source solution, incurs lower initial setup costs; however, additional expenses for infrastructure and technical resources may occur, justified by its ability to handle large-scale analytics efficiently.

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

1NCE

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IoT Connectivity (9th)

ClickHouse

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (3rd), Vector Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

1NCE and ClickHouse aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. 1NCE is designed for IoT Connectivity and holds a mindshare of 2.9%.
ClickHouse, on the other hand, focuses on Open Source Databases, holds 6.4% mindshare, up 4.4% since last year.

IoT Connectivity Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
1NCE	2.9%
AWS IoT Core	22.4%
EMQX	11.8%
Other	62.900000000000006%

IoT Connectivity

Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ClickHouse	6.4%
PostgreSQL	13.1%
MySQL	11.4%
Other	69.1%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Konda

Solution Architect at Synechron

Centralized device connectivity has improved operations but monitoring integrations still need work

The best features of 1NCE that I can recollect would be the connectivity management model of an operational architecture from an operational architecture standpoint. Because I have been working as a solution architect for over five to six years, having a centralized management visibility for IoT connected devices across distributed deployments is very useful. Regarding centralized management, the capability helped in giving the operations and engineering teams the ability to monitor and check the connectivity status, outages, device activity, and all that. That is one better use case. Instead of coordinating with different providers, the visibility and monitoring is key for any infrastructure. Provisioning through one platform is one of the best use cases. From an architecture perspective, having consolidated visibility also made it easier to track the behavior and maintain consistency of the distribution deployments. I would repeat that what is primarily important is about the deployments, visibility, and the engineering teams in one place. That is something good with the best use case of the application. Instead of coordinating with different providers or handling fragmented visibility, the team could manage provisioning, troubleshooting, and monitoring more efficiently through one platform.

Read full review

reviewer2785038

Senior Data Engineer at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees

Data observability has enabled real‑time analytics and cost savings but needs smoother inserts and cleanup

ClickHouse could be improved concerning data insertion, especially given the high amount of data handled. Constant efforts are made to optimize the features on its own, but with merges and inserts, only a single insert query can be performed allowing for the input of only 100,000 rows per second. It would be beneficial to insert more data and have configurations that are less user-operated. Ideally, ClickHouse would optimize itself to handle these processes automatically, reducing the need to contact the ClickHouse support team for infrastructure optimization. Additionally, delays are experienced when trying to delete databases with corrupt data, taking too much time and causing major outages, which necessitate contacting multiple teams across continents for resolution. The community surrounding ClickHouse also seems limited, providing a reliance on documentation, and there is a scarcity of developers working with ClickHouse, which hinders growth. If ClickHouse were more user-friendly and technically feasible, it would likely see greater expansion in usage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Instead of coordinating with different providers, the visibility and monitoring is key for any infrastructure, and provisioning through one platform is one of the best use cases."

"The tool's most valuable feature is a database. It supports portal APIs and offers good flexibility."

"ClickHouse is open source with no vendor lock-in, providing excellent freedom to choose any vendor without restrictions."

"ClickHouse is much faster than traditional databases like MySQL and MongoDB. Its column-row searching strategy makes it very efficient. With ClickHouse, we can manage multiple databases, automatically insert data from other databases and delete data as needed. It supports real-time query performance, allowing simultaneous data insertion and retrieval. ClickHouse has improved significantly over the past two years, adding more functions and queries, as well as top functionality."

"The main feature of ClickHouse is the optimizer because we had too many records to deduplicate, and the optimizer took this task by itself."

"We faced a challenge with deploying ClickHouse onto Kubernetes. Recently, we've been using ClickHouse Cloud, and the main issue is the high cost of the cloud service. The pricing isn't very competitive, especially for startups. I would instead buy a server and self-host if I have enough disk space. Besides that, ClickHouse has done very well, with clear goals and effective execution."

"The tool is column-based and infinitely scalable."

"With ClickHouse, since data is stored in a columnar way, we get aggregation functions that are much faster than transactional databases, such as SQL Server, and the cost efficiency is also much reduced compared to Cosmos DB since we use it on-premises, the cost is nearly cut, which is very useful for us."

"ClickHouse provides responses within a few seconds, typically two to three seconds, which is impressive."

More ClickHouse pros

Cons

"The areas for improvement could be around analytics and reporting flexibility."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is very expensive—ClickHouse is the most expensive option."

"The aggregation capability is a valuable feature. It's highly efficient, allowing us to review entire transaction histories and user activities in the market. We've tried MongoDB, Postgres, MariaDB, and BigQuery, but ClickHouse is the most cost-efficient solution for collecting data at high speeds with minimal cost. We even used ClickHouse Cloud for a month, and it proved to be a great setup, especially for startups looking to handle big data. For example, if there is a need for 2-4 terabytes of data and around 40 billion rows with reasonable computing speed and latency, ClickHouse is ideal. Regarding the real-time query performance of ClickHouse, when using an API server to query it, I achieved query results in less than twenty milliseconds in some of my experiments with one billion rows. However, it depends on the scenario since ClickHouse has limitations in handling mutations. Additionally, one of ClickHouse's strengths is its compression capability. Our experimental server has only four terabytes, and ClickHouse effectively compresses data, allowing us to store large amounts of data at high speed. This compression efficiency is a significant advantage of using ClickHouse."

"There aren't too many improvements I'd suggest for ClickHouse as it covers all my needs. There are just a few technical issues. For example, sometimes, when you want to get unique values and use certain tables, they don't work as expected. But it's not a major problem."

"Additionally, delays are experienced when trying to delete databases with corrupt data, taking too much time and causing major outages, which necessitate contacting multiple teams across continents for resolution."

"There are some areas where ClickHouse could improve. Specifically, we encountered incompatibilities with its SQL syntax when migrating queries from MySQL or SQL to ClickHouse. This difference in details made it challenging to figure out the exact issues. Additionally, we faced difficulties due to the lack of a proper Django driver for ClickHouse, unlike MySQL, which Django supports out of the box."

"We had a lot of troubles while deploying a whole cluster."

"Initially, I faced challenges integrating ClickHouse, particularly with inserting data from ActiveMQ, which caused duplicates. However, after adjusting the ClickHouse settings, the issue was resolved and there were no more duplicates."

"ClickHouse could be improved with self-hosting capabilities and better documentation for how to host it at scale."

More ClickHouse cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We used the free, community version of ClickHouse."

"For pricing, if you use the self-hosted version, it would be free. Cloud services pricing would be an eight out of ten. I try to minimize costs but still have to monitor usage."

"If you have an in-house deployment on Kubernetes or something, it's going to be very cheap since you'll be managing everything."

"ClickHouse has an open-source version, which is free to use and has almost all the features."

"The tool is free."

"ClickHouse Cloud is not expensive compared to other databases, costing a few dollars per month while providing fast performance."

"The tool is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Connectivity solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,125 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

34%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with 1NCE?

The areas for improvement could be around analytics and reporting flexibility. While the platform provides good operational visibility, having more customizable dashboards and deeper reporting capa...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for 1NCE?

I have been using 1NCE for over a year and a half. Primarily, it is a solution for IoT connectivity and device communication use cases across distributed environments. My primary use case for 1NCE ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering 1NCE?

1NCE is a good product and I would recommend this. I would rate this review a 7.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ClickHouse?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was such that the setup costs were just my own bandwidth, while licensing and pricing were done by other members of the team so it was abstract...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ClickHouse?

ClickHouse can be improved on the documentation side, and there is one small constraint that is mentioned in ClickHouse documentation, which is a partition limit of ten thousand that we hit, so if ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ClickHouse?

My main use case for ClickHouse is data ingestion and for its OLAP properties, as we had use cases where database locks were slowing us down and because ClickHouse does not have that, we chose to u...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

OpenSearch vs ClickHouse

Compared 10% of the time

MySQL vs ClickHouse

Compared 7% of the time

VictoriaMetrics vs ClickHouse

Compared 7% of the time

Cassandra vs ClickHouse

Compared 7% of the time

InfluxDB vs ClickHouse

Compared 6% of the time

More ClickHouse Competitors

Product Reports

No data available

Buyer's Guide

ClickHouse

June 2026

Download ClickHouse product report

Overview

1NCE offers a comprehensive connectivity solution designed for IoT applications, providing reliable and efficient data transmission services. It caters to businesses seeking cost-effective global IoT connectivity.

1NCE specializes in simplifying IoT connectivity with features that support various industries. Its services deliver reliable connections suitable for businesses requiring robust data transmission options. By focusing on practical use cases, 1NCE meets the growing demand for seamless IoT integration, offering scalable and flexible services that enhance communication between devices and networks. With a focus on quality, 1NCE empowers companies to leverage IoT technologies effectively, ensuring streamlined operations and communication.

What are the key features of 1NCE?

Global Connectivity: Provides seamless worldwide network coverage for IoT devices.
Flat Rate Pricing: Offers predictable costs across all networks to simplify budget planning.
Low Power Network: Ensures energy-efficient connection for extended device operation.
Secure Data Transmission: Includes end-to-end encryption for secure data transfer.
API & Integration: Facilitates easy integration with existing systems and platforms.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Achieves significant savings with flat pricing models across networks.
Improved Scalability: Supports easy expansion of IoT deployments globally.
Reliability: Offers consistent and stable connectivity for mission-critical applications.
Enhanced Security: Provides peace of mind with robust security features.
Operational Flexibility: Adapts to dynamic business needs with scalable solutions.

In logistics, 1NCE facilitates real-time tracking and monitoring, improving supply chain transparency. In agriculture, its connectivity supports smart farming by enabling sensors to provide critical environmental data. For smart cities, it enhances infrastructure management with connected devices communicating efficiently across urban settings.

1NCE

ClickHouse is renowned for its speed, scalability, and real-time query performance. Its compatibility with SQL standards enhances flexibility while enabling integration with popular tools.

ClickHouse leverages a column-based architecture for efficient data compression and real-time analytics. It seamlessly integrates with tools like Kafka and Tableau and is effective in handling large datasets due to its cost-efficient aggregation capabilities. With robust data deduplication and strong community backing, users can access comprehensive documentation and up-to-date functionality. However, improvements in third-party integration, cloud deployment, and handling of SQL syntax differences are noted, impacting ease-of-use and migration from other databases.

What features make ClickHouse outstanding?

Speed and Scalability: Enables rapid deployment and scalability, particularly on Kubernetes.
SQL Compatibility: Aligns with SQL standards for flexible database management.
Column-based Structure: Offers efficient data compression and quick query performance.
Integration Support: Works with Kafka, Tableau, and other popular platforms.
Data Deduplication: Manages complex data duplication efficiently.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-Efficiency: Reduces expenses while managing large datasets effectively.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides fast data processing for real-time insights.
Flexibility: Offers multiple integration points and compatibility options.
Robust Documentation: Backed by an active development community, ensuring comprehensive support.

ClickHouse is deployed in sectors like telecommunications for passive monitoring and is beneficial for data analytics, logging Clickstream data, and as an ETL engine. Organizations harness it for machine learning applications when combined with GPT. With the ability to be installed independently, it's an attractive option for avoiding cloud service costs.

ClickHouse

We monitor all IoT Connectivity reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.