No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo

ActiveBatch by Redwood Reviews

Vendor: ActiveBatch by Redwood
4.6 out of 5
Leave a review

What is ActiveBatch by Redwood?

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

Get the ActiveBatch by Redwood Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood, Camunda, Control-M and more!
ActiveBatch by Redwood is the #14 ranked solution in top Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions, #14 ranked solution in top Workload Automation solutions, and #22 ranked solution in top Process Automation solutions. PeerSpot users give ActiveBatch by Redwood an average rating of 9.2 out of 10. ActiveBatch by Redwood is most commonly compared to Camunda: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Camunda. ActiveBatch by Redwood is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 49% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 12% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
ActiveBatch by Redwood
May 2026
Get the report
Helped 892,646 peers since 2012

Featured ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

Read more reviews

ActiveBatch by Redwood mindshare

Product category:
Workload Automation
As of May 2026, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood in the Workload Automation category stands at 3.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ActiveBatch by Redwood3.1%
Control-M12.1%
AutoSys Workload Automation7.0%
Other77.8%
Workload Automation

PeerResearch reports based on ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWorkload AutomationMay 3, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 3, 2026Download
ComparisonActiveBatch by Redwood vs Control-MMay 3, 2026Download
ComparisonActiveBatch by Redwood vs Automic AutomationMay 3, 2026Download
ComparisonActiveBatch by Redwood vs JAMSMay 3, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Camunda4.1N/A89%78 interviewsAdd to research
Control-M4.412.1%98%201 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

ActiveBatch offers extensive automation capabilities, including job scheduling, error alerts, end-to-end workflow visibility, and API integrations. Users appreciate its ease of use, featuring a robust interface and pre-built job steps that save time and reduce errors. The seamless orchestration of various platforms and applications improves operational efficiency by minimizing manual intervention while enhancing accuracy and data flow. Customizable to fit diverse needs, ActiveBatch is highly valued for its flexibility and powerful automation features.
  • "I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent."
  • "I found ActiveBatch Workload Automation to be a very good scheduling tool, and what I like best about it is that it has very less downtime when managing many complex scheduling workflows, so I'm very impressed with ActiveBatch Workload Automation."
  • "This is a very good tool and I'm really missing it in my new company because I don't have a robust enterprise-wide scheduling tool and a really good tool for automating end-to-end."

Room for Improvement

ActiveBatch by Redwood users highlight several areas for improvement: a steep learning curve, complicated UI, limited documentation, and unreliable triggers. Users desire better cloud integration, advanced customization, and a more intuitive interface. Issues with reporting, automation reliability, and onboarding processes are mentioned. Enhancing mobile access, pricing transparency, debugging tools, and integration with other platforms are requested. Improvements in customer support and scalability, along with more training materials, would enhance user experience and productivity.
  • "The technical support was difficult if you wanted to escalate the issue, it takes a little bit longer to escalate."
  • "An area for improvement in ActiveBatch Workload Automation is its interface or GUI. It could be a little better."
  • "We haven't explored the cloud aspect of the solution because it's very costly."

ROI

ActiveBatch by Redwood has significantly boosted ROI by streamlining workflows, improving job success rates, and reducing manual labor hours. Organizations report enhanced efficiency with automation of processes and error detection capabilities, resulting in time savings and increased productivity. It simplifies data flow dependencies, contributes to an increase in net revenue, and achieves SLA targets effectively. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface and cost efficiency, indicating that ActiveBatch adds tremendous value to their operations.

Pricing

ActiveBatch by Redwood offers competitive and reasonable pricing for enterprise automation, with standard licensing and additional costs for plugins and features like VMware integration. Users note the value for money, ease of setup within days, and accessible licensing options. A shift to a subscription model has caused friction, though many find the transition manageable. The solution is praised for reliability, support, and effective training resources, positioning it as a valuable product in the market.
  • "I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."
  • "The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."
  • "If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

Popular Use Cases

ActiveBatch by Redwood is primarily used for comprehensive data processing, scheduling batch processes, and automating various workflows across on-premises and cloud environments. Users employ it for orchestrating data transfers, running business intelligence reports, and integrating solutions like SAP, SQL, and PowerShell. It efficiently handles tasks such as server monitoring, nightly processes, and job scheduling, reducing manual intervention and increasing productivity.

Service and Support

Users describe ActiveBatch by Redwood's customer service as highly responsive, with technical support offering fast assistance. Support teams are praised for their quick and effective problem-solving abilities. They address issues swiftly across time zones and adapt to client needs, though some users mention variability in expertise and occasional delays when issues need escalation. Interaction with technical support is typically positive, with staff going beyond expectations, though email support can sometimes be cumbersome.

Deployment

Users found ActiveBatch by Redwood's initial setup to be straightforward, yet certain components like Oracle integration posed challenges. Some complexities arose due to a lack of documentation, requiring careful planning and phased implementation. Upgrades across versions were seamless, maintaining backward compatibility. Maintenance generally required minimal effort once configured, but secure connections demanded vendor support. Deployments varied in duration, with some taking only hours while others extended due to careful testing and staggered schedules.

Scalability

ActiveBatch by Redwood demonstrates strong scalability across various businesses. Users report smooth handling of thousands of jobs daily without performance degradation. It accommodates growth and supports numerous environments. Users highlight its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse departments while maintaining efficiency. The setup allows for expansion without significant issues, supporting enterprises of different sizes. Its features facilitate both reusability of jobs and easy management of concurrent tasks, making it an adaptable and robust choice.

Stability

ActiveBatch by Redwood is highly stable with minimal downtime. Users have shared their success in long-term usage without significant disruptions. Most issues stem from external factors, such as back-end systems or old implementations. Organizations appreciate its self-maintenance and efficiency, leading to time savings and improved business operations. There are minor problems, often self-inflicted or involving other systems. ActiveBatch's stability and reliability make it a preferred choice for managing workload in various environments.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our ActiveBatch by Redwood Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise19
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business124
Midsize Enterprise75
Large Enterprise188
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Performing Arts
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Government
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
University
5%
Retailer
5%
Consumer Goods Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Transportation Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Media Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
1%
Non Profit
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%

Compare ActiveBatch by Redwood with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about ActiveBatch by Redwood

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?
  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
  • Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
  • Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
  • Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
  • Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
  • Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.
What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?
  • Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
  • Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
  • Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
  • Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood was previously known as ActiveBatch.

ActiveBatch by Redwood customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Related questions

  • 35
What is no-code workflow automation and how is it useful?
  • 33
Are API integrations important for reliable IT automation?
  • 35
What factors should I consider when looking for a workload automation solution?
  • 137
Which is Best: Scheduler Control M, CA or Tidal?
  • 60
When evaluating Workload Automation, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 47
What should businesses start to automate first when starting off with an enterprise scheduling tool?
  • 61
What is the best workload automation tool in the market?
  • 106
How does Control-M rank in the Workload Automation market compared with other products?
  • 116
Should project automation software be integrated with cloud-based tools?
  • 40
Why is Workload Automation important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Workload Automation
Process Automation
Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Camunda vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Camunda vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Appian vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Appian vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
JAMS vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
JAMS vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Automic Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Automic Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
GoAnywhere MFT vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
GoAnywhere MFT vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
IBM Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
IBM Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Jitterbit Harmony vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Jitterbit Harmony vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
AWS Step Functions vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
AWS Step Functions vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
See all alternatives
 
ActiveBatch by Redwood Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Application Administrator Lead at Bluestem4.5I've used ActiveBatch by Redwood for eight years to manage workflows and maintenance; it's stable, scalable, and user-friendly, though its web console and real-time updates need improvement. The AI tool and automation features have enhanced support efficiency.
Manager, Production Services at a tech services company with 51-200 employees3.0I use ActiveBatch by Redwood mainly for file processing of debit card transactions. It's easy to set up jobs thanks to the user-friendly interface, though I feel the UI could use modernization. Overall, it's a solid no-code solution.
Associate Consultant at Capgemini4.5ActiveBatch automation efficiently manages organizational workloads by overseeing, scheduling, and executing tasks seamlessly. Its alert mechanism excels, though UI improvements and training videos are needed for better user experience. It outperforms UC4 Automic, enhancing file transfer efficiency significantly.
Senior Analyst at Capgemini5.0I use ActiveBatch Workload Automation to boost IT productivity by automating processes through its centralized platform. The pre-built job steps save time and reduce errors, though customer support and installation guidance could be improved, especially regarding technical assistance.
Senior Analyst at Electronics For Imaging, Inc5.0I use ActiveBatch to streamline our data processing and reporting workflow. Its drag-and-drop feature and integration capabilities require minimal coding. Despite minor improvements needed, it remains efficient and significantly reduces manual hours, without previously transitioning from other software.
Junior Business Analyst at EFI4.5As sales operations analysts, we use ActiveBatch to automate data processing, reducing manual errors and time from 25 to 5 hours. The user interface and scalability need improvements, but its centralized platform and automation offer significant productivity gains without requiring prior evaluations of other solutions.
ServiceNow Developer at Accenture4.5ActiveBatch has streamlined our IT workflows with its user-friendly interface and pre-built templates for easy automation. It improves efficiency and error handling, though some advanced features and support need enhancement, including better training resources and improved application integration.
Information Technology Analyst at NTT DATA Services5.0We struggled with manual job monitoring until ActiveBatch automated our tasks, reducing errors with event-based triggers. It's reliable for complex scheduling, though documentation needs enhancing. Achieving 98% KPI improvement with ActiveBatch delivered great ROI, far surpassing manual processes.