Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Safe-T Secure Application Access Logo

Safe-T Secure Application Access Reviews

Vendor: Safe-T
3.9 out of 5

What is Safe-T Secure Application Access?

Featured Safe-T Secure Application Access reviews

Safe-T Secure Application Access mindshare

Product category:
As of March 2026, the mindshare of Safe-T Secure Application Access in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category stands at 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Safe-T Secure Application Access0.5%
OpenVPN Access Server13.3%
Fortinet FortiClient6.8%
Other79.4%
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

PeerResearch reports based on Safe-T Secure Application Access reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryEnterprise Infrastructure VPNMar 27, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonSafe-T Secure Application Access vs OpenVPN Access ServerMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonSafe-T Secure Application Access vs Fortinet FortiClientMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonSafe-T Secure Application Access vs Check Point Remote Access VPNMar 27, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks4.16.2%92%65 interviewsAdd to research
Okta Platform4.3N/A96%102 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Compare Safe-T Secure Application Access with alternative products

Learn more about Safe-T Secure Application Access

Safe-T Secure Application Access customers

Related questions

 
Safe-T Secure Application Access Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Network and Security Engineer2.0I dislike Safe-T due to its complex setup, difficult configuration, poor integration with other programs, and lack of simple logging. Support also needs improvement, even though it was chosen for price.
Manager | Leader | IT | Cyber Security | Cloud | Devops at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5We find this secure email solution highly flexible and secure, easily integrating with our systems, which was superior to alternatives. It's very stable, but we miss read-only document features and wish feature development timelines were more predictable.
Systems Administrator4.5Safe-T greatly improved my customer data security and met regulations. Features like the Outlook add-on are valuable. Setup was complex but customizable; their 9/10 support addressed all requests, though fixes take time. It's stable, and I am satisfied.
Infrastructure Manager4.5I use Safe-T for secure email, appreciating its easy-to-use Outlook plugin and interface over alternatives. Setup was straightforward; support is amazing despite occasional stability issues. Pricing is good.
IT Manager at a retailer with 51-200 employees4.0I recommend this solution for securely sending/receiving large files. It's easy to use via web, though the web version has a 2GB limit. The Outlook agent is problematic, but customer service and setup are excellent.
CTO with 201-500 employees4.0I use Safe-T for secure and large email/file transfers, valuing its stability and ability to meet regulations, despite a complex UI and configuration that often requires support. Initial setup was also challenging, but I find it delivers value for its price, rating it an 8/10.
Solutions Sales VP at a tech services company with 1-10 employeesNo summary available
Technical Support Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0I value Safe-T SMFT's stability, scalability, and strong technical support. Despite the non-straightforward setup and cloud limitations for Swiss customers, its secure file transfer features and close company collaboration make it a unique and effective solution at this price point.