Platform9 Managed Kubernetes Reviews

Platform9 Managed Kubernetes is a SaaS-managed solution where Kubernetes is managed by the provider, and we use it extensively. It is a solution that avoids significant headaches because self-managing our own Kubernetes is a major headache and overhead. By using a platform-managed Kubernetes or managed Kubernetes service, we can eliminate this burden.

Most day-to-day, I use high integrations from Platform9 Managed Kubernetes because our company has many integrations. We had to integrate with many other tools as well, which is why we use this integration capability. Additionally, we use security features including RBAC, monitoring and logging, compliance and certification. Fully managed Kubernetes is a significant feature. We use all those features for security as well.

The best features of Platform9 Managed Kubernetes are automatic cluster management, high availability, scalability, cost management, comprehensive security features, and high integrations. Many integrations are possible here. RBAC, which is role-based access control, is also available. Other valuable features include customizable networking, monitoring and logging, and compliance and certification.

Most day-to-day, I use high integrations from Platform9 Managed Kubernetes because our company has many integrations. We had to integrate with many other tools as well, which is why we use this integration capability. Additionally, we use security features including RBAC, monitoring and logging, compliance and certification. Fully managed Kubernetes is a significant feature. We use all those features for security as well.

With Platform9 Managed Kubernetes, cluster upgrades sometimes fail. Private registry support is available, but integrations with private registry can be somewhat harder. The support part can be better. Platform9 support is not up to par at the moment.

Because support is not good, that is a significant reason for improvement. Additional integrations, such as serverless functionality, are not possible at this time, but may be possible in the future. The documentation is somewhat unclear sometimes. If Platform9 improves on these parts, I would rate it between eight and nine instead of my current rating of six.

I have been familiar with Platform9 Managed Kubernetes for around one year.

Earlier, we were using self-managed Kubernetes using kOps. We had to manage everything from scratch, including certificates, cluster bindings, service roles, clusters, nodes, master nodes, and normal nodes. Now, with Platform9 Managed Kubernetes, Platform9 manages these aspects for us instead. It is a fully managed tool that has helped us save approximately forty percent of our time compared to self-hosted solutions.

If you are considering Platform9 Managed Kubernetes, have your infrastructure team be very strong. Even though you have a fully managed Kubernetes service, your platform team and DevOps team should be very strong. That is one important piece of advice. Additionally, ensure you understand the infrastructure costing and all related expenses. We cannot completely rely on fully managed services. The DevOps team will have to regularly audit, change, and modify things according to organizational needs. I would rate this product a six out of ten.

My main use case for Platform9 Managed Kubernetes is to implement the software, and I mostly took care of the implementation part.

A specific example of how I use Platform9 Managed Kubernetes is in a project involving fresh installation and all related tasks.

From my experience, the best features that Platform9 Managed Kubernetes offers are an enhanced interface with a user-friendly design. You can access the portals and create CRMs and other functionalities.

The feature I personally use the most in my work is portal access.

Platform9 Managed Kubernetes has impacted my organization in a positive way as it helped improve our workflow.

Previously, we used multiple platforms for our business purposes, but after adopting Platform9 Managed Kubernetes, we are able to use multiple tools in a single graphical interface. That makes it really helpful.

Platform9 Managed Kubernetes could be better as the implementation part was somewhat challenging, but after the first implementation, it became easy to manage.

I would appreciate if Platform9 Managed Kubernetes provided guidance within the portal, as that would be very helpful for the implementation process.

I have been familiar with Platform9 Managed Kubernetes for two years.

My advice to someone considering Platform9 Managed Kubernetes is that endpoint connectivity should be more seamless and reliable.

I have observed that the reliability of the system is affected when working from home or any scenario outside the office, as connectivity can be lost for a few minutes.

It would be beneficial if this aspect were improved.

I can quantify the impact as we were able to reduce costs by eliminating multiple vendors.

The pricing-related issue has been solved. Approximately ten to fifteen vendors have been eliminated.

Platform9 Managed Kubernetes is a good platform for centralized management.

However, the implementation part is somewhat difficult in the initial stage.

I would rate Platform9 Managed Kubernetes overall a seven out of ten for this reason; otherwise, it would be an eight or nine.

My main use case for Platform9 Managed Kubernetes is to migrate monolithic services to microservices and manage existing clusters.

When I open Platform9 Managed Kubernetes, the first thing I do is check my cluster and ensure the pods are in a healthy state or identify any issues.

Platform9 Managed Kubernetes has saved our resources because on a cluster, it consumes only the resources that are required at that time.

It's a cost reduction; our application was running on ten servers, but now we can release our application on just two servers.

Platform9 Managed Kubernetes has changed how we collaborate and work together as a team.

The best features of Platform9 Managed Kubernetes include flexibility and security. We also have Docker, but it's not as secure or flexible as Platform9 Managed Kubernetes.

The biggest friction point I've encountered with Platform9 Managed Kubernetes is implementing Ingress on an application; it's really frustrating and takes more than a month to stabilize the application.

If I could change one thing about Platform9 Managed Kubernetes, it would be the shift from using Docker to moving to CNI, which would change my workflow.

There are no features I wish Platform9 Managed Kubernetes had that it doesn't have today.

I have been familiar with Platform9 Managed Kubernetes for five years.

Before Platform9 Managed Kubernetes, we were using VMware VMs.

When I first implemented Platform9 Managed Kubernetes, it took a week to get up and running, but in a healthy production environment, it took a month.

The implementation followed a team-like workflow.

When I was evaluating options, I considered OpenShift.

I chose Platform9 Managed Kubernetes specifically over other options like OpenShift or managed clusters on public clouds because these are more costly. OpenShift requires RHEL subscriptions, and managed clusters incur additional costs apart from hardware resources.

My advice for someone considering Platform9 Managed Kubernetes with a similar workflow to mine is that if you want to expose your application to the public environment and use minimal resources, you must choose Platform9 Managed Kubernetes.

Platform9 Managed Kubernetes Secrets, Platform9 Managed Kubernetes ConfigMap, and Platform9 Managed Kubernetes Vault are a few things that require additional coverage; there are a number of things worth mentioning.

I give this product a rating of eight out of ten.