GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
GitLab | 2.6% |
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) | 22.4% |
Checkmarx One | 10.3% |
Other | 64.7% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | Application Security Tools | Aug 25, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Aug 25, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | GitLab vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) | Aug 25, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | GitLab vs Veracode | Aug 25, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | GitLab vs Checkmarx One | Aug 25, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) | 4.0 | 22.4% | 81% | 116 interviewsAdd to research |
ServiceNow | 4.2 | N/A | 91% | 223 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 34 |
Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
Large Enterprise | 38 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 744 |
Midsize Enterprise | 494 |
Large Enterprise | 2317 |
GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.
What are GitLab's most valuable features?In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.
GitLab was previously known as Fuzzit.
1. NASA
2. IBM
3. Sony
4. Alibaba
5. CERN
6. Siemens
7. Volkswagen
8. ING
9. Ticketmaster
10. SpaceX
11. Adobe
12. Intuit
13. Autodesk
14. Rakuten
15. Unity Technologies
16. Pandora
17. Electronic Arts
18. Nordstrom
19. Verizon
20. Comcast
21. Philips
22. Deutsche Telekom
23. Orange
24. Fujitsu
25. Ericsson
26. Nokia
27. General Electric
28. Cisco
29. Accenture
30. Deloitte
31. PwC
32. KPMG
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven | 4.5 | We use GitLab for deploying applications in various environments as a DevOps platform. The CI/CD pipelines and repository management are valuable, enhancing agility and time to market. Improvements needed include embedded security features and testing integration. |
Chief Technology Officer at Acclym | 4.0 | I primarily use GitLab for software development, valuing features like Git, code reviews, and pipelines. It's user-friendly and manages repositories well, though the lack of mandatory code review configuration and occasional stability issues are drawbacks. |
Junior Associate at McKinsey | 4.0 | I use GitLab primarily for development and managing repositories, finding its intuitive features like pulling, merging, and maintaining pipelines valuable. While it saves time and money, task management could be improved to match DevOps or Jira's capabilities. |
It Architect at UBS Financial | 4.0 | I primarily use GitLab for code check-ins, issue management, and backlog management, appreciating its CI/CD pipelines and security features. However, it lacks some advanced project planning features found in Jira, such as milestone weights and sophisticated roadmaps. |
IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione | 4.0 | We upgraded to GitLab Ultimate from the open-source version for enhanced security scanning features. The CI/CD pipeline with Helm improved our deployment speed from hours to minutes. The licensing model could be more accommodating, but we're satisfied with the switch from Jenkins. |
Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | I primarily use GitLab for source control and CI/CD, benefiting from seamless integration and faster market delivery. While GitLab's source control is excellent, its GitOps capability needs enhancement, particularly compared to Argo CD, and the user interface requires improvement. |
Senior Application Developer at IBM | 3.5 | We used GitLab mainly for code management, utilizing features like branching and conflict resolution, while integrating deployment tools such as Octopus and OpenShift. Though its comprehensive documentation helped, improved UI and more insightful logs could enhance usability. |
AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy | 5.0 | I use GitLab to manage our development lifecycle, appreciating its automated CI/CD pipelines for enhanced productivity and collaboration. While it excels over Bitbucket in cloud capabilities, improvements in repository management and UI updates with AI features are needed. |