Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] is utilized for tenant creation, VM management, hybrid deployment, cloud management, and port configuration.
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco Intersight | 4.0 | N/A | 100% | 15 interviewsAdd to research |
| Azure NetApp Files | 4.0 | 14.0% | 88% | 17 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
Primary users include DevOps teams, telecom companies, and service providers. It integrates well with ACI and ASX-T, offering stability, initial setup ease, and extensive documentation. Known for high trust in Latin America, it excels in workflow automation through Action Orchestrator and supports detailed configuration down to ports. However, improvements are required in DevOps alignment, upgrades, automation, and cost management.
What are the most important features of Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]?Among its features, Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] serves industries like telecom and service providers needing hybrid deployment and cloud management. DevOps teams utilize it for tenant creation and VM management. Known for stability and initial setup ease, it supports Latin American regions highly. Action Orchestrator aids in workflow automation, benefitting user workflows. Improvements in DevOps alignment, UI, multi-tenancy, YAML abstraction, and cost management are desirable. It requires better security for XDR and comprehensive cloud offerings, including architecture and network security features.
Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] was previously known as CliQr, CliQr CloudCenter.
NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlex
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Director Of Technology at a non-profit with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | We use Cisco CloudCenter for configuring and monitoring ports through its GUI interface. While it's detailed, its benefits are limited with older switches and can be costly. We've started migrating to Ubiquiti for its affordability and intuitiveness. |
| General Manager & Practice Lead - CMA at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | No summary available |
| Software Developer at FNB South Africa | 4.0 | No summary available |
| Architecte Technologies at Intact Financial Corporation | 3.0 | No summary available |
| Azure IoT Developer & Solutions Architecture trainee (AZ-220) at Afrika Tikkun Services | 4.5 | I use Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] for demonstration, device provisioning, and data management, but it lacks a comprehensive cloud offering, including architecture and network security features. I haven't considered other solutions or specified a cloud provider. |
| CTO at Logicalis | 4.0 | Cisco CloudCenter is agile with integration-friendly APIs, although its XDR security needs enhancement. I didn't consider other solutions or providers. There was no specific use case or ROI indicated in the review. |
| Manager at Nirqa | 4.5 | No summary available |
| Senior Architect Principal Infrastructure at Intact Financial Corporation | 4.0 | No summary available |
![Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/0dra2w8zbx5vrvwmhkdswx9l90ys.jpg)
![Cisco Intersight vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/0dra2w8zbx5vrvwmhkdswx9l90ys.jpg){kind=small}
![Azure NetApp Files vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/d0l9qfqabzdxvnpfjyza8ogvpueo.jpg){kind=small}
![CloudStack vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/hNMJJ78MbNcvroPwWE3TSr3f.jpg){kind=small}