Azure Site Recovery Reviews

Name: Azure Site Recovery
Brand: Microsoft
Rating: 4.0 (26 reviews)

4.0 out of 5

26 reviews
92% willing to recommend

What is Azure Site Recovery?

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Get the Azure Site Recovery Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery, Commvault Cloud, VMware Live Recovery and more!

Azure Site Recovery is the #3 ranked solution in top Disaster Recovery as a Service providers. PeerSpot users give Azure Site Recovery an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. Azure Site Recovery is most commonly compared to Commvault Cloud: Azure Site Recovery vs Commvault Cloud. Azure Site Recovery is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 57% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 16% of all views.

Helped 859,579 peers since 2012

Featured Azure Site Recovery reviews

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

First of all, we initially faced a challenge as Azure Site Recovery was not supporting shared disk options on SQL clusters with VMs, which are important for a Windows cluster mode. Additionally, the setup is quite easy, only requiring the creation of a vault. Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.

Read full review

Rafael Veloso

Consultant at SoftwareONE

Setting up Azure Site Recovery is straightforward, but even for the simplest services, having some prior experience can be beneficial to avoid unnecessary costs. If you're already familiar with Azure or other cloud providers, you'll understand the process better and can efficiently complete the setup without extra expenses. The initial setup takes around four to five hours, depending on the volume of data being synced and the complexities of your network. It's crucial to designate individuals responsible for different aspects of the implementation. You need someone who understands the business data and cares about its integrity. The data owner should be knowledgeable about SLAs and data objectives. Additionally, having someone experienced with networking and cloud services ensures a smoother deployment. For smaller environments needing replication for a few virtual machines or traffic redirection, having three dedicated resources like a business data owner, a networking expert, and a cloud services specialist should suffice.

Read full review

Mike Douthitt

Senior System Administrator at Douthitt.net

Speaking about how Azure Site Recovery has facilitated the migration of on-premises workloads to the Azure Cloud, I would say that my company is still in the testing phase, and we also use Veeam. My company is trying to find the best spot for recovery, disaster recovery, and migrations. Veeam plays a big part in what my company does in terms of backup and recovery, so we are just trying to figure out how a Microsoft tool will fit into our environment. I haven't faced any challenges using the product. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Azure Site Recovery mindshare

As of July 2025, the mindshare of Azure Site Recovery in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category stands at 23.2%, up from 22.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery as a Service

PeerResearch reports based on Azure Site Recovery reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Disaster Recovery as a Service	Jul 1, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jul 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery	Jul 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Azure Site Recovery vs Commvault Cloud	Jul 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	Azure Site Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service	Jul 1, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Commvault Cloud	4.3	11.6%	95%	110 interviews Add to research
VMware Live Recovery	4.1	22.8%	88%	80 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Azure Site Recovery offers notable features such as seamless disaster recovery, automated file synchronization, user-friendly console, and load balancing. The system provides efficient failover and recovery, reliable performance, cost savings, and scalability. Users appreciate its ease of setup, security, visibility through dashboards, and ability to minimize downtime. Azure Site Recovery effectively handles data replication, ensuring data consistency across servers. Organizations find its cost-effectiveness and compatibility with existing Azure services advantageous for enterprise-level use.

"A major benefit is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site."
"The features I find most valuable in Azure Site Recovery include the test failover, which allows us to test our site recovery without bringing down the primary; disaster recovery provides that feature."
"The most valuable features of Azure Site Recovery are its ease of use and speed of recovery."

Room for Improvement

Azure Site Recovery requires improvement in its pricing model and error logging. Users find the deployment complex and express concerns about replication, failover processes, and limited integration. They request enhancements in scalability, support, synchronization, security features, and automation capabilities. Integration with additional platforms and increased monitoring features are desired, alongside quicker response times from technical support and clearer communication about costs and updates.

"Recently, I worked with a mass issue related to Recovery Services Vault, and the VM support engineers are taking a lot of time to extend support to the customer."
"The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration with other services."
"The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations. For stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten."

ROI

Azure Site Recovery delivers a positive return on investment by simplifying processes and enhancing reliability. It's more cost-effective than establishing a second data center and saves time by ensuring quick VM activation. Compared to other solutions, it reduces VM backup and restore time by 30%. While its service level justifies the cost, smaller companies may not actively measure return as it serves more as a security feature. Time-saving features promote resource efficiency.

Pricing

Azure Site Recovery offers flexible pricing that varies based on factors such as storage, network traffic, and resource usage. Enterprise buyers note that while the cost is neither very low nor excessively high, it can be somewhat challenging to estimate accurately due to fluctuating variables. Licensing is consumption-based, leading to some complexity in billing, yet many find it reasonably priced or cost-effective compared to traditional disaster recovery solutions.

"The tool is expensive. What is expensive to me might not be expensive to you. As I mentioned, we seek ways to reduce our costs. If the price goes down, that would be great. I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."
"Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
"Azure Site Recovery is affordable."

Popular Use Cases

Azure Site Recovery is primarily used for disaster recovery, ensuring continuity during failures. It helps organizations replicate data from on-premises to Azure, providing a backup for environments. Businesses across various sectors like healthcare and hospitality utilize it for compliance and business continuity. They manage critical infrastructure and execute migrations, occasionally conducting drills to validate recovery plans. Many find it valuable for reducing downtime and costs associated with maintaining physical disaster recovery sites.

Service and Support

Azure Site Recovery customer service and support receive mixed feedback. Many users commend Microsoft's support as helpful and professional, giving ratings up to nine out of ten. However, others report slow response times and communication challenges, leading to ratings as low as five out of ten. While some appreciate quick ticket resolution, others find the process cumbersome, especially for non-partners. Some rely on partners for assistance before contacting Microsoft directly. Satisfaction varies widely among different users.

Deployment

Azure Site Recovery's initial setup is generally easy and uncomplicated. It involves installing clients and configuring the site recovery, often completed in hours or days. Complexity can arise depending on infrastructure and data size. External support may be necessary, particularly from Microsoft or experienced partners. Many find documentation limited, making expertise vital. Synchronization takes longer, especially with large VMs, and can involve multiple team members responsible for networking and cloud tasks.

Scalability

Azure Site Recovery offers high scalability, supporting a wide range of users from small businesses to large enterprises. Feedback varies, with most finding it effective and flexible for disaster recovery. Some mention dependencies on regional capacity, but generally, it accommodates extensive usage. Some rate its scalability highly, appreciating ease of use and cost-effectiveness. Organizations experience varying scalability levels, sometimes influenced by setup and geographical factors, but generally find it adaptable for different needs.

Stability

Azure Site Recovery is widely recognized as a stable offering. Most users experience consistent performance, with ratings often ranging between seven to ten out of ten. Occasional issues have occurred, but stability remains strong. It is described as generally reliable, with some experiencing exceptional consistency. Stability is contingent upon specific situations, but the consensus highlights its robustness and dependability.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Azure Site Recovery Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.