AWS CodeBuild Reviews

Name: AWS CodeBuild
Brand: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Rating: 4.1 (12 reviews)

4.1 out of 5

12 reviews
91% willing to recommend

What is AWS CodeBuild?

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

Get the AWS CodeBuild Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeBuild, GitLab, Tekton and more!

AWS CodeBuild is the #9 ranked solution in top Build Automation solutions. PeerSpot users give AWS CodeBuild an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. AWS CodeBuild is most commonly compared to GitLab: AWS CodeBuild vs GitLab. AWS CodeBuild is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 57% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 17% of all views.

Helped 861,490 peers since 2012

Featured AWS CodeBuild reviews

Mahadev Metre

DevOps Engineer at Paydoh

AWS CodeBuild's support for a wide range of programming languages and build environments benefits development teams significantly in terms of productivity and ease of use. There are extensive libraries of code structures available, making it a universal pipeline. All programming languages I have worked with are supported in AWS CodeBuild, eliminating the need for alternative deployment services. The service supports iOS builds, Kotlin, Java, NodeJS, and ReactJS. AWS has made it accessible to all languages, allowing developers to simply open the console and trigger builds. AWS manages all the background server operations for building or deploying code. For standard builds such as ReactJS or Java, a Linux or Ubuntu server suffices. AWS provides its own operating system for these purposes. For builds requiring physical servers, such as Apple macOS server, AWS rents Mac minis specifically for iOS and SwiftUI builds. While this incurs higher charges, it demonstrates AWS's commitment to providing comprehensive solutions for all use cases.

Read full review

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors. It's crucial to have accurate environment configurations to avoid such problems. During the build stage, we often face time issues that cause delays, which can be troublesome.

Read full review

Stepan Raichl

AWS Competency Lead at trask

We have it on various client projects and we rarely use it individually. It forms part of an entire pipeline committed in CodeCommit along with all the customers' code. Then, it's picked up by CodeBuild in the pipeline to build the site, update the sites, and update the services with CloudFormation…

Read full review

AWS CodeBuild mindshare

As of July 2025, the mindshare of AWS CodeBuild in the Build Automation category stands at 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

PeerResearch reports based on AWS CodeBuild reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Build Automation	Jul 13, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jul 13, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS CodeBuild vs GitLab	Jul 13, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS CodeBuild vs Tekton	Jul 13, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS CodeBuild vs Jenkins	Jul 13, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
GitLab	4.2	15.0%	97%	85 interviews Add to research
Tekton	3.8	11.7%	88%	36 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

AWS CodeBuild is valued for seamless integrations with AWS services and third-party tools, automatic scaling, and support for multiple programming languages. Users appreciate its variable management, which simplifies build pipeline configurations, and robust logging features for efficient troubleshooting. Its serverless nature ensures elasticity and reliability. CodeBuild also accommodates various platforms, enhancing workflow streamlining. Support for continuous integration and delivery is enhanced by webhook triggers for version control repositories, smoothing development processes across different environments.

"AWS CodeBuild reduces wait time and optimizes workflows."
"One of the main features I value in CodeBuild compared to previous experiences, like using Jenkins, is its ability to handle tasks automatically with AWS, requiring only proper setup of the check file."
"CodeBuild supports various platforms and coding."

Room for Improvement

AWS CodeBuild lacks sufficient integrations and has challenges with management overhead, persistent storage, and workspace preservation. Users encounter deployment failures, lack of looping functionality, and limited build instance types. The interface is difficult to use, and integration with Bitbucket and Octopus Deploy needs enhancement. Notification features are insufficient, leading to difficulties with image errors, pricing transparency, geographical limitations, and server availability, particularly for macOS and iOS in regions outside the US.

"Multiple clients have faced issues with pricing. After migrating from Azure to EC2, they were unexpectedly charged 100,000 rupees because the pricing details were not clearly visible."
"One of the main challenges is that if the environment is not set up properly, it will result in issues such as image errors."
"We had integration issues with a tool called Octopus Deploy while using CodeBuild. AWS support helped us resolve it, however, it could be better."

Pricing

Enterprise users find AWS CodeBuild's pricing manageable, especially since they only pay for compute resources during the build process, optimizing costs through caching and artifacts. Initial expenses exist but can be minimized for investment returns. It's notably more economical than other solutions, though it may initially surprise new users due to cost visibility. While CodeBuild is bundled with other services affordably, macOS server costs are higher due to dedicated resources.

"AWS CodeBuild is free. We only pay for our code's compute resources during the build process. For example, if our code takes ten minutes to build, we only pay for those ten minutes of computing time. CodeDeploy and CodePipeline are free because they're serverless and don't require computing resources. CodeCommit has minimal costs for storing code."
"Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."
"We pay a monthly licensing fee."

Popular Use Cases

AWS CodeBuild is primarily used for continuous integration and building pipelines. Users create CI/CD pipelines, build Docker images, application binaries, and manage microservice-based applications. It integrates with CodePipeline, CodeCommit, and CodeDeploy for automated builds and deployments, contributing to efficient workflows in AWS environments. Utilizing environments like Docker and repositories such as GitHub, AWS CodeBuild automates tasks like setting environment variables, managing secrets, and executing code for various languages, supporting the entire deployment lifecycle.

Service and Support

AWS CodeBuild customer support is frequently praised for its promptness and effectiveness. Many users find AWS support satisfactory and responsive, noting that they usually receive replies within the agreed timeframe. AWS support is often rated between eight to ten out of ten, attributed especially to those with enterprise accounts. Comparatively, AWS support is deemed superior to Azure, which experiences delays with lower-tier subscribers. Users appreciate AWS's clarity in addressing integration issues and report high satisfaction levels.

Deployment

AWS CodeBuild's initial setup shows mixed opinions. Some find it straightforward without the need for installation, requiring only login and script writing, while others mention a learning curve and configuration complexity. Although AWS CodeBuild simplifies deployment with a streamlined automated process, some rate it a lengthy process. Users with AWS experience find it easier, highlighting its integration in a comprehensive CICD suite involving CodeCommit, CodeDeploy, and CodePipeline. Most users report smoother operation after initial errors.

Scalability

AWS CodeBuild excels in scalability, dynamically adjusting to meet diverse demands. Its automatic scaling efficiently handles multiple concurrent builds, simplifying management during peak times. Users note its compatibility with various providers as a significant advantage, although some report CPU limitations compared to alternative solutions. Despite these concerns, users commend its seamless pipeline creation and absence of storage issues. However, misinterpretation of autoscaling may lead to unexpected costs for new users.

Stability

AWS CodeBuild is considered highly stable by users, receiving ratings up to ten out of ten. There are rare instances of instability, such as crashes or bugs, usually managed by checking parameters and dependencies. Stability issues sometimes relate to resource limitations and processing speed, impacting certain applications. Users appreciate its reliability without downtimes, especially important for containerized environments, though some encounter challenges with environment variables during builds.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our AWS CodeBuild Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.