Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Temporal?

Get the report
Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Featured Temporal reviews

Temporal mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of Temporal in the Process Automation category stands at 7.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Temporal7.4%
Camunda24.8%
Flowable6.6%
Other61.199999999999996%
Process Automation

PeerResearch reports based on Temporal reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryProcess AutomationSep 16, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 16, 2025Download
ComparisonTemporal vs CamundaSep 16, 2025Download
ComparisonTemporal vs Control-MSep 16, 2025Download
ComparisonTemporal vs Pega PlatformSep 16, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Camunda4.124.8%89%77 interviewsAdd to research
Control-M4.34.6%97%133 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business98
Midsize Enterprise47
Large Enterprise269
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
15%
Retailer
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Media Company
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Government
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
University
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Logistics Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Educational Organization
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Sports Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare Temporal with alternative products

Learn more about Temporal

Related questions

 
Temporal Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Founder & CEO at Lanzar4.0We've used Temporal for eight months to automate financial and supply chain workflows, finding it scalable, cost-effective, and stable, though its UI lacks. It's saved us time and significant costs, despite a learning curve for junior developers.
Senior Software Engineer at A.P. Moller - Maersk4.0As part of MoCS's platform engineering team, we found Temporal ideal for orchestrating workflows and managing API deployments. While it excels in handling complex workflows, it needs better visualization tools and improved documentation to reduce its steep learning curve.
Software Engineer at Anchorage Digital4.5I use Temporal for workflow management primarily due to its ability to handle retries and ensure idempotence. However, its retro compatibility needs improvement as compatibility issues arise with new workflow changes, contrasting my previous use of RabbitMQ in personal projects.
Backend Software Engineer at Fortics5.0I use Temporal to manage WhatsApp API messages, appreciating its retry system and availability. It efficiently handles microservice crashes. While scalability sometimes falters with complex workflows, switching to Cassandra improved it. Overall, it's cost-effective and worth the investment.
Software Engineer at KONSTANTA PLUS, d.o.o4.5I am developing a SaaS platform with Temporal, valuing its durable execution and observability features. Though initially complex, especially with .NET workflows, Temporal simplifies retries and debugging, but could improve .NET support for adding workers and clients.
Software Engineer (Backend) at One4.0We use Temporal for scheduling and event-triggering workflows, valuing its fault tolerance and monitoring features. Despite needing improvements in event tracking, it's superior to previous solutions like Airflow due to its flexibility and support for complex business logic.
Senior Software Engineer at Dell Technologies4.0We adopted Temporal for our multi-language workflow orchestration across various platforms like AWS and Azure. It efficiently handles business logic but lacks built-in security features and clearer documentation, which complicates integration for new users.
Software Developer at Groww4.5We use Temporal for managing long-running workflows, like callbacks received after a day or two. It handles continuous processes efficiently, although we experience issues with Temporal's versions and databases, especially older versions causing workflow terminations with Astra DB.