Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
Ariel Lindenfeld - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Content at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 20
  • 140

When evaluating Functional Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

Let the community know what you think. Share your opinions now!

PeerSpot user
22 Answers
PeerSpot user
Founder and CEO with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 20
15 October 21

It has got to be ROI (Return on Investment).

Most of the other answers have focused on features. Yes, it is important that it does the job you need, supports your applications, ease of use, widely used product, etc. Plus, these days it has built-in AI, to reduce script effort and maintenance.

However, if it doesn’t do those things, the ROI will not be proved. The reality is that tools are cheaper than people. The right tool for the job saves time, which saves money – ROI proved.

This article “7 Mistakes to Avoid When Buying Software to Improve Your Testing” could help you avoid making one or more mistakes.

Software Development Analyst at Huntington Ingalls Industries
26 March 21

Low mainenece and make sure test doesn't break with slightest change.

Dina Dzousa - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Automation Analyst at EY
Real User
Top 5
10 February 21

Verity of feature and scalability of the platform for future use. I also prefer tools with test analytics. 

User at a tech services company
Real User
15 July 20

Ensuring that the tool covers the technological characteristics of its infrastructure, its budget and above all ensuring that it serves to cover E2E throughout the life cycle of functional and non-functional tests, concluding with a PoC to show the capacity of the tool is essential because the client marries the solution shown in their infrastructure and validating that the tool is indeed useful.

Partner - Client Solutions at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
18 February 20

Autonomous scripting based on test case leveraging NLP/AI and AI/ML for maintenance of Test Scripts.
For Complex environment E2E testing across multiple applications, enable use of modular test assets.

Jagadeesh  J - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Engineer at Cigniti Technologies
10 July 20

Should support for all platforms and technologies. rich in features like hybrid framework, multiple scripting languages

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2022.
633,572 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Business Head- Software Services at MicroGenesis Techsoft Pvt. Ltd. at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
13 February 20

Environment coverage - Standalone, Mobile, Web, API, Cloud, IOT etc.

Feature Rich - Scripting languages, Hybrid framework, Codeless

Future Ready - AI, ML support

Volodymyr Nabok - PeerSpot reviewer
Quality Assurance Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5
03 February 20

Imho, there are such aspects:
1. Can a Functional Testing Tool (FTT) recognize controls of exactly your app on each of required platforms (MacOS, Andoid etc)?
2. Can a FTT work with apps' dialogs, system dialogs (like "Save file")?
3. Can a FFT recognize right-click menu items?
4. Does the developer of a FTT have good community? It helps with answers in the future.

Also, for commercial usage it is highly important that a FTT has 1) IDE, 2) test recording tool, 3) inspect tool.
If you plan to use a FFT on a large project be sure the FFT can work on few machines simultaneously.

23 April 19

- robust record and play
- maintainability
- customization (user code)

PeerSpot user
Principal Consultant at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
22 January 19

The ability for non-developers to quickly come up to speed and use.

PeerSpot user
Test Lead at DXC Technology
Real User
19 May 18

To me, the most important aspect is regression testing and maintainability of the script. Customized Reporting is also one of the important factor.

PeerSpot user
QA Team Manager at MTS - Mer Telemanagement Solutions
Real User
17 May 18

Simulate user actions and verify the database state

Architect at CSX Corporation
03 May 18

For me, it's integration with other testing tools, such as TDM suites, performance measuring tools, etc.

James Logsdon - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Owner at a transportation company
Real User
01 February 18

It is important to be able to verify with the product owner that the correct thing is being built. The product owner should be able to execute the SUT against the specifications and have buy in early on what is being built. Other factors include continuous integration builds, code coverage, with automated data-driven tests.

PeerSpot user
-- at a tech company with 51-200 employees
11 December 17

1. Identify all the objects (including ShadowDOM) & support all web components (angular / polymer)
2. Supports all frameworks (Data driven testing, Keyword driven testing, Hybrid ...)
3. Supports mobile & desktop, web & application testing (Windows, Mac, ...)
4. Support for continuous integration (Bamboo, Jenkins, ...)

it_user759165 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Tester with 11-50 employees
20 October 17

To me, the most important aspect to look for when evaluating functional testing tool is "It is fit for purpose and future-proof". Once this question is answered, then rest can be taken care of easily.

PeerSpot user
System Analyst at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
11 March 17

The first thing to look for is its usability. Based on my experience, any user will not use your tool if it is not user friendly. they will go back to the good old excel sheet if the GUI is hard to navigate. Also reliability, i find web based tool more reliable.

PeerSpot user
Programmer / Analyst at a religious institution with 10,001+ employees
01 February 17

Assuming that the tool is competent to test the application, how easy is it to set up, execute and manage test cases? If it requires a lot of support and time to prepare and execute tests, tests cannot be easily prepared and run when needed - thus the tool isn't helpful.

PeerSpot user
Senior Consultant, Professional Services at Tricentis
24 August 16

The stability of the tool is paramount. If the advertised features don't consistently work and cause frustration then the tool will never be adopted. You would want to make sure they have competent and accessible customer support as well.

PeerSpot user
Senior QA Manager at Manhattan Associates
20 June 16

Support for running across browsers/devices and robustness

PeerSpot user
Software QA Analyst at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
23 March 16

To me, the most important aspect to look for when evaluating functional testing tools is how good the tools are in recognizing controls/objects from the Applications Under Test and how well they do in handling Custom Objects or objects not recognized.

PeerSpot user
Product Manager at Tricentis
Real User
21 March 16

The most important aspect to look for when evaluating functional testing tools is how much the tools are able go beyond GUI testing. In other words, to which extent they support non-GUI and API testing approaches.

Related Questions
Development Specialist at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jun 03, 2021
I'm working for a company with 1000+ employees and I'm exploring two products: Panaya and Tricentis.  How good is Panaya Test Dynamix in comparison with Tricentis?  Thank you!
2 out of 4 answers
Key Account Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
11 May 21
Panaya and Tricentis are both good. Could you share more info on your use case and what are your key selection criteria ?
Evgeny Belenky - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
22 May 21
@Jesús Antonio Santos Giraldo ​, can you please share more details about your case as suggested by @John ​so that our peers can assist you with your queston?
Ariel Lindenfeld - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Content at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
May 07, 2015
If you've created an RFP template for Testing Tools, share it with the community in order to help others out.
2 out of 7 answers
Assoc Quality Analyst at OptumServe Technology Services
09 April 15
I have a RFP template that Info-Tech Research group developed. I don't know how to upload the word doc in here therefore I have copied the entire content here. You can export this to the word and modify accordingly. Hope this is useful. My primary focus on Web Services Security Testing. Software Testing Solution RFP Template Introduction: How to Use This Template A Request for Proposal (RFP) is a formal invitation issued by a business or agency requesting interested vendors to submit written proposals meeting a particular set of requirements. If interested in bidding for the project, vendors respond with a description of the techniques they would employ to meet the requirements, a plan of work, and a detailed budget for the project, along with supporting information. An RFP may form part of the final contract once negotiations between the enterprise and the vendor are completed. Delete all information where text is colored GREY (such as this paragraph). Fill in or delete all form fields shaded in GREY (such as the “Insert Company Name Here” field below). Form shading is not visible in printouts. Change all necessary text to BLACK before printing or sending. Insert Company Name Here Request for Proposal for a Software Testing Solution Insert Date of Issue Here   Table of Contents 1 STATEMENT OF WORK 3 1.1 PURPOSE 3 1.2 COVERAGE & PARTICIPATION 3 2 GENERAL INFORMATION 3 2.1 ORIGINAL RFP DOCUMENT 3 2.2 THE ORGANIZATION 3 2.3 EXISTING TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT 3 2.4 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS 4 3 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS 4 3.1 VENDOR’S UNDERSTANDING OF THE RFP 4 3.2 GOOD FAITH STATEMENT 4 3.3 COMMUNICATION 4 3.4 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION 6 3.5 CRITERIA FOR SELECTION 6 3.6 SELECTION AND NOTIFICATION 7 4 SCOPE OF WORK, SPECIFICATIONS & REQUIREMENTS 7 4.1 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS 7 4.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 7 4.3 ENGAGEMENT METHODOLOGY 7 5 VENDOR QUALIFICATIONS & REFERENCES 7 6 BUDGET & ESTIMATED PRICING 8 6.1 ESTIMATED COSTS 8 7 ADDITIONAL TERMS & CONDITIONS 9 7.1 PERSONAL INFORMATION 9 7.2 NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 10 7.3 COSTS 10 7.4 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 10 7.5 RESPONDENT’S RESPONSES 10 7.6 GOVERNING LAW 10 7.7 NO LIABILITY 10 7.8 ENTIRE RFP 11 8 VENDOR CERTIFICATION 11 SCHEDULE “A” NOTICE OF INTENTION 12   1 Statement of Work 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this Request for Proposal (RFP) is to invite prospective vendors to submit a proposal to supply a Software Testing solution to Insert Enterprise Name Here. The RFP provides vendors with the relevant operational, performance, application, and architectural requirements of the system. 1.2 Coverage & Participation The intended coverage of this RFP, and any agreement resulting from this solicitation, shall be for the use of all departments at Insert Enterprise Name Here along with any satellite offices. Insert Enterprise Name Here reserves the right not to enter into any contract, to add and/or delete elements, or to change any element of the coverage and participation at any time without prior notification and without any liability or obligation of any kind or amount. 2 General Information 2.1 Original RFP Document Insert Enterprise Name Here shall retain the RFP, and all related terms and conditions, exhibits and other attachments, in original form in an archival copy. Any modification of these, in the vendor’s submission, is grounds for immediate disqualification. 2.2 The Organization Describe the organization in a few brief paragraphs. Include a description of the business and location, including any satellite offices that will be involved in the project. Also include the objectives of the groups who will be using the system, the number of users for the system, expected growth, and what you hope to achieve with the system. Insert Enterprise Description Here Industry: Products/Services offered: Customer types (e.g. B2B, B2C, G): Sector (public, private, NFP): Major drivers for Software Testing system (e.g. policy, compliance, response to existing threats): Relevant compliance regulations (e.g. SEC 17a, Sarbanes-Oxley, HIPAA): 2.3 Existing Technology Environment The following is a listing of our current technology environment. Insert Existing Technology Environment Here Example: LAN type Server operating system Desktop operating system Development platforms End-point deployment solutions and approach to ALM solution deployment Third-party API integration(s) 2.4 Schedule of Events The following is a tentative schedule that will apply to this RFP, but may change in accordance with the organization’s needs or unforeseen circumstances. Changes will be communicated by email to all invited bidders. List all major dates or milestones below. Include the issuance of the RFP, the technical questions closing dates, the RFP response closing date (including an exact time and time zone), the end of evaluation date, and the final award notification date. Issuance of RFP Insert Date Here Technical Questions/Inquiries Due Insert Date, Time, Time Zone Here RFP Closes Insert Date, Time, Time Zone Here Complete Initial Evaluation Insert Date Here Final Award Notification Insert Date Here Example: Issuance of RFP November 10, 2014 Technical Questions/Inquiries Due December 8, 2014 17:00 EST RFP Closes December 15, 2014 14:00 EST Complete Initial Evaluation January 5, 2015 Final Award Notification January 12, 2015 3 Proposal Preparation Instructions 3.1 Vendor’s Understanding of the RFP In responding to this RFP, the vendor accepts full responsibility to understand the RFP in its entirety, and in detail, including making any inquiries to Insert Enterprise Name Here as necessary to gain such understanding. Insert Enterprise Name Here reserves the right to disqualify any vendor who demonstrates less than such understanding. Further, Insert Enterprise Name Here reserves the right to determine, at its sole discretion, whether the vendor has demonstrated such understanding. That right extends to cancellation of award, if award has been made. Such disqualification and/or cancellation shall be at no fault, cost, or liability whatsoever to Insert Enterprise Name Here 3.2 Good Faith Statement All information provided by Insert Enterprise Name Here in this RFP is offered in good faith. Individual items are subject to change at any time. Insert Enterprise Name Here makes no certification that any item is without error. Insert Enterprise Name Here is not responsible or liable for any use of the information or for any claims asserted therefrom. 3.3 Communication Verbal communication shall not be effective unless formally confirmed in writing by a specified procurement official in charge of managing this RFP process. In no case shall verbal communication govern over written communication. 3.3.1 Vendors’ Inquiries. Applicable terms and conditions herein shall govern communications and inquiries between Insert Enterprise Name Here and vendors as they relate to this RFP. Inquiries, questions, and requests for clarification related to this RFP are to be directed in writing to: Insert Enterprise Name Here Insert Department Name Here Insert Address Here Insert City, State/Province, ZIP/Postal Code Here Attention: Insert Contact Name Here Telephone: Insert (Area Code) Phone Number Here Fax: Insert (Area Code) Fax Number Here Email: Insert Contact Email Address Here 3.3.2 Informal Communications shall include, but are not limited to: requests from/to vendors or vendors’ representatives in any kind of capacity, to/from any Insert Enterprise Name Here employee or representative of any kind or capacity with the exception of Insert Contact Name Here for information, comments, speculation, etc. Inquiries for clarifications and information that will not require addenda may be submitted verbally to the named above at any time. 3.3.3 Formal Communications shall include, but are not limited to: • Questions concerning this RFP: Questions must be submitted in writing and be received prior to Insert Date, Time, Time Zone Here. • Errors and omissions in this RFP and enhancements: Vendors shall bring to Insert Enterprise Name Here any discrepancies, errors, or omissions that may exist within this RFP. With respect to this RFP, vendors shall recommend to Insert Enterprise Name Here any enhancements that might be in the best interests of Insert Enterprise Name Here. These recommendations must be submitted in writing and be received prior to Insert Date, Time, Time Zone Here. • Inquiries about technical interpretations must be submitted in writing and be received prior to Insert Date, Time, Time Zone Here. • Inquiries for clarifications/information that will not require addenda may be submitted verbally to the buyer named above at any time during this process. • Verbal and/or written presentations and pre-award negations under this RFP. • Addenda to this RFP. Addenda: Insert Enterprise Name Here will make a good-faith effort to provide a written response to each question or request for clarification that requires addenda within Insert Number of Days (#) Here business days. All questions, answers, and addenda will be shared with all recipients. Insert Enterprise Name Here will not respond to any questions or requests for clarification that require addenda, if received by Insert Enterprise Name Here after Insert Date, Time, Time Zone Here. Indicate how written responses will be addressed. Example: All addenda will be posted to our website only. Insert Site Address or other Form of Communication Here Example: 3.4 Proposal Submission Proposals must be delivered sealed to: Insert Contact Name Here Insert Enterprise Name Here Insert Department Name Here Insert Address Here Insert City, State/Province, ZIP/Postal Code Here on or prior to Insert Date, Time, Time Zone Here. Insert Enterprise Name Here shall not accept proposals received by fax. Vendors are to submit Insert Number of Copies (#) Here original copy of proposal marked “Original” and Insert Number of Copies (#) Here marked “Copy.” Each original and copy must be individually bound. Please provide one electronic copy on a CD. Insert Enterprise Name Here will not accept proposals delivered via email. 3.5 Criteria for Selection The evaluation of each response to this RFP will be based on its demonstrated competence, compliance, format, and organization. The purpose of this RFP is to identify those suppliers that have the interest, capability, and financial strength to supply Insert Enterprise Name Here with a [System Type] identified in the Scope of Work. Evaluation Criteria: 1. [Criteria] 2. [Criteria] 3. [Criteria] 4. [Criteria] 5. [Criteria] Example: 1. Capability of vendor to meet or exceed requirements set forth in Scope of Work. 2. Expressed interest in working with [company name]. 3. Financial stability of vendor. 4. Ability of vendor to communicate its vision and capacity for establishing a relationship that addresses current and future needs and trends in the industry. 5. Apparent likelihood and desirability of proposed system. 3.6 Selection and Notification Vendors determined by Insert Enterprise Name Here who possess the capacity to compete for this contract will be selected to move into the negotiation phase of this process. Written notification will be sent to these vendors via mail. Those vendors not selected for the negotiation phase will not be notified. 4 Scope of Work, Specifications & Requirements Include a detailed list of the business and technical requirements. Include a further description for each requirement (typically, in order of importance or in logical categories with importance ranked), and ask the vendor to describe how they will fulfill each requirement. 4.1 Functional Requirements This section should contain a detailed description of the essential characteristics of the product or service. Identify special or distinctive requirements that differentiate the organization’s needs from other buyers. Avoid making the specifications unnecessarily specific; this can eliminate viable suppliers. Example: “The reporting component of the software is to generate the following type of standard reports: …The specific data to be included in a report should be selectable using a menu system. The system will reject a report request if the requestor does not have access rights to the data.” 4.2 Technical Specifications This section should describe any technical standards or interconnection requirements that the product must address, or skill requirements for technical staff. Make it clear if some technical standards are preferred but not compulsory. Example: • The application software must operate on Windows Server 2008 • The application must utilize Windows SQL Server 2008 4.3 Engagement Methodology This section should identify any special requirements for how and where the vendor is to carry out work, key responsibilities of the vendor, and any special terms and conditions that are to be included in the contract but are not covered in Section 7, Additional Terms and Conditions. For example, the vendor staff will work at our development center at 2500 Main Street, Palo Alto, CA. The purchaser can, at its convenience, terminate the development contract with one month’s notice. 5 Vendor Qualifications & References All vendors must provide the following information in order for their proposal to be considered: Example: 1. A brief outline of the vendor company and services offered, including: • Full legal name of the company • Year business was established • Number of people currently employed • Income statement and balance sheet for each of the two most recently completed fiscal years certified by a public accountant 2. An outline of the product line-up and/or services it currently supports. 3. A description of geographic reach and market penetration. 4. An outline of partnerships and relationships to date. 5. An outline of current and future strategies in the marketplace. 6. Information on its current clients, including: • Total number of current clients. • A list of clients with similar needs using similar products and/or services. • Evidence of successful completion of a project of a similar size and complexity. 7. References: Contact information for five references (if possible) from projects similar in size, application, and scope and a brief description of their implementation. 6 Budget & Estimated Pricing All vendors must fill out the following cost breakdown for the implementation of their solution for Insert Enterprise Name Here’s project as described in this RFP. Costs should be identified as either capital or non-capital in nature. The vendor must agree to keep these prices valid for [Number of Days (#)] days as of [Date, Time, and Time Zone]. 6.1 Estimated Costs For all available deployment models, provide a five year cost summary as displayed below. Five Year Total Cost Summary Costs Total Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Hardware Software Licensing Third-Party Software (Middleware) Installation Legacy Data Loading Maintenance Documentation & Training Project Management Miscellaneous Total: Suggested Cost Categories: Hardware: List, describe, and record the cost of each piece of hardware that is required to optimally run the software. Software Licensing: List, describe, and record the licensing, implementation, maintenance, support, and training fees associated with your proposed software. Third-Party Software (Middleware): List, describe, and record the cost of each piece of software (including operating systems) that is required to optimally run the software. Installation: Describe any labor, equipment, supplies, or other costs associated with installing your proposed software. Integration: Describe any labor, equipment, supplies, or other costs associated with integrating [Insert Proposed Solution] into our current architecture and back-end systems. Legacy Data Loading: Describe any labor, equipment, or other costs associated with importing legacy data from current systems into the new system. Maintenance: Describe and cost out any other ongoing costs associated with the operation and maintenance of your proposed [Insert System Solution]. Documentation & Training: If there are fees associated with your user or technical documentation, list them here. Project Management: If there are project management fees associated with your proposed software, list and describe them here. Miscellaneous: List and describe any other costs associated with your proposed software solution. 7 Additional Terms & Conditions 7.1 Personal Information 7.1.1 General Depending on the circumstances, Insert Enterprise Name Here may require information related to the qualifications and experience of persons who are proposed or available to provide services. This may include, but is not limited to, resumes, documentation of accreditation, and/or letters of reference. The Respondent should not submit as part of its Response any information related to the qualifications, experience of persons who are proposed or available to provide services unless specifically requested. Unless specifically requested, any such information, whether in the form of resumes or other documentation, will be returned immediately to the Respondent. Insert Enterprise Name Here will treat this information in accordance with the provisions of this Section [Section Number]. 7.1.2 Requested Personal Information Any personal information as defined in the [Applicable Legislation] that is requested from each Respondent by Insert Enterprise Name Here shall only be used to consider the qualified individuals to undertake the project/services and to confirm that the work performed is consistent with these qualifications. It is the responsibility of each Respondent to obtain the consent of such individuals prior to providing the information to Insert Enterprise Name Here. Insert Enterprise Name Here will consider that the appropriate consents have been obtained for the disclosure to and use by Insert Enterprise Name Here of the requested information for the purposes described. 7.2 Non-Disclosure Agreement Insert Enterprise Name Here reserves the right to require any Respondent to enter into a non-disclosure agreement. 7.3 Costs The RFP does not obligate Insert Enterprise Name Here to pay for any costs, of any kind whatsoever, which may be incurred by a Respondent or any third parties, in connection with the Response. All Responses and supporting documentation shall become the property of Insert Enterprise Name Here, subject to claims of confidentiality in respect of the Response and supporting documentation. 7.4 Intellectual Property The Respondent should not use any intellectual property of Insert Enterprise Name Here including, but not limited to, all logos, registered trademarks, or trade names of Insert Enterprise Name Here, at any time without the prior written approval of Insert Enterprise Name Here, as appropriate. 7.5 Respondent’s Responses All accepted Responses shall become the property of Insert Enterprise Name Here and will not be returned. 7.6 Governing Law This RFP and the Respondent’s Response shall be governed by the laws of [Relevant Jurisdiction]. 7.7 No Liability Insert Enterprise Name Here shall not be liable to any Respondent, person, or entity for any losses, expenses, costs, claims, or damages of any kind: • Arising out of, by reason of, or attributable to, the Respondent responding to this RFP; or • As a result of the use of any information, error, or omission contained in this RFP document or provided during the RFP process. 7.8 Entire RFP This RFP, any addenda to it, and any attached schedules, constitute the entire RFP. 8 Vendor Certification This certification attests to the vendor’s awareness and agreement to the content of this RFP and all accompanying calendar schedules and provisions contained herein. The vendor must ensure that the following certificate is duly completed and correctly executed by an authorized officer of your company. This proposal is submitted in response to [RFP ID] issued by Insert Enterprise Name Here. The undersigned is a duly authorized officer, hereby certifies that: (Vendor Name) agrees to be bound by the content of this proposal and agrees to comply with the terms, conditions, and provisions of the referenced RFP and any addenda thereto in the event of an award. Exceptions are to be noted as stated in the RFP. The proposal shall remain in effect for a period of [Number of Days (#)] calendar days as of [RFP Due Date]. The undersigned further certify that their firm (check one):  IS  IS NOT currently debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment by any federal entity. The undersigned agree to notify Insert Enterprise Name Here of any change in this status, should one occur, until such time as an award has been made under this procurement action. Person[s] authorized to negotiate on behalf of this firm for purposes of this RFP are: Name: Title: Signature: Date: Name: Title: Signature: Date: Signature of Authorized Officer: Name: Title: Signature: Date:   Schedule “A” Notice of Intention [RFP ID] NOTICE OF INTENTION REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL From: [VENDOR ORGANIZATION NAME] [AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE] [TELEPHONE NO.] [FAX NO.] [EMAIL] Please state your intention with regard to the Request for Proposal [RFP ID] by selecting one of the following: [ ] Intends to respond to Insert Enterprise Name Here’s Request for Proposal [ ] Does not intend to respond to Insert Enterprise Name Here’s Request for Proposal TO: [CLIENT ORGANIZATION NAME] [CLIENT NAME, TITLE, AND ADDRESS] [TELEPHONE NO.] [FAX NO.]   _____________________________________________________ For acceptable use of this template, refer to Info-Tech's Terms of Use. These documents are intended to supply general information only, not specific professional or personal advice, and are not intended to be used as a substitute for any kind of professional advice. Use this document either in whole or in part as a basis and guide for document creation. To customize this document with corporate marks and titles, simply replace the Info-Tech information in the Header and Footer fields of this document.
09 April 15
I don’t have a template. I start attending a few webinars on the tools and then the salesmen calls me. I have some unique requirement having to test web sites and native apps on IOS and Android devices. I also need to load test. I could write a RFP but would still have to explain it the vendor when they respond. Douglas Johnson
Related Categories
Download Free Report
Download our free Functional Testing Tools Report and find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ, and more! Updated: September 2022.
633,572 professionals have used our research since 2012.