2019-11-28T06:06:00Z
Julia Frohwein - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director of Delivery at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 0
  • 3

What needs improvement with Microsoft Analytics Platform System?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Microsoft Analytics Platform System.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

4
PeerSpot user
4 Answers
HF
Data Solution Architect at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-08-06T06:47:05Z
Aug 6, 2020

In general, I am not really very satisfied with the tutorials that are out there. When Microsoft releases a new tool, technology — whatever it is — oftentimes it is not really very easy to get your hands on the insightful information and documentation, training courses, and other training materials. If you can find them, they may not explain what you need to know in a nice way. Often times they are a little bit fragmented. These user-oriented guides are something that should be better and released along with the products they are supposed to support. For example, we have servers in Azure called Azure Data Factory which I work with quite a lot. When a new feature or new release happens, finding the right documentation or resources that explain these features and how do you work with them is a little bit more difficult than it should be, in my opinion. There are probably a lot of extra features that might be considered to add to the scope of this solution. However, adding ports for different types of users may be one of the best. Certain users are advanced users and they can find their way around. But sometimes non-technical users or those that do not have a lot of technical background can find the complexity a little bit difficult to work with. Better handling of user gateways and privileges would be a benefit.

Search for a product comparison
reviewer1188402 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Infrastructure at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
MSP
2020-05-06T07:44:00Z
May 6, 2020

I think the biggest problem with the product is that it does a data ingest model, which is very expensive.

AK
Delivery Lead at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
Real User
2020-02-13T07:50:00Z
Feb 13, 2020

With the release of the 2019 version, I think Microsoft Stack has the capability for machine learning and in fact, it can now live in a Linux environment. I have had to deal exclusively with Microsoft technology for about 17 years working with the product and I personally have not deployed that capability, but I think that one thing is a big improvement in potential flexibility. If they can continue to do one important thing with each release like what Oracle is already doing, I think it is good. For example, if you do select star (*) from one table, Oracle returns the first 50 results. Microsoft will return all the results regardless of the number of rows in a table. I think these key features and functionality are something that Microsoft should improve because it makes sense how Oracle treats the customer queries. There are a few other improvements that can be made, but I can see key limitations in what Microsoft has in comparison to Oracle. They should concentrate on the most important features and add them. In my opinion, the standard technical support at Microsoft should be improved as well. It is not really helping a product to be noticed in the market if they allow support to just remain at the market standard. So I think it should be improved for clients who do not choose to pay for premium services. What I would like to see in upcoming releases is improvement in the machine learning and the AI to make it much easier for people to jumpstart their efforts. The foundation for this is probably already there the data platform, but making people able to do machine learning solutions and artificial intelligence very fast would help them have success and become more involved to learn about the technology. So, I would say to make that learning experience as short as possible and provide useful examples. Then that will help.

SenkoAltic - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Manager at Erste group
Real User
2019-11-28T06:06:00Z
Nov 28, 2019

The flexibility of this solution needs to be improved because you cannot make changes at every one of the different steps.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Teradata, Apache and others in Data Warehouse. Updated: November 2022.
653,584 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Feb 13, 2020
Hi, We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information. Please share what you can so you can help your peers.
See 1 answer
AK
Delivery Lead at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
Feb 13, 2020
Besides the standard licensing users have to pay additional fees for technical support. The default support I think is just the same as with other products and it has become industry standard to be average. But if you pay the additional premium price for the above-average standard of service, you do experience an enhanced support experience.
Julia Frohwein - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director of Delivery at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Feb 13, 2020
Hi, We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information. Please share what you can so you can help your peers.
See 1 answer
AK
Delivery Lead at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
Feb 13, 2020
Besides the standard licensing users have to pay additional fees for technical support. The default support I think is just the same as with other products and it has become industry standard to be average. But if you pay the additional premium price for the above-average standard of service, you do experience an enhanced support experience.
Download Free Report
Download our free Data Warehouse Report and find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Teradata, Apache, and more! Updated: November 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
653,584 professionals have used our research since 2012.