Juniper lacks a network access control agent similar to solutions like Alubakya Path and Cisco ISE. There should be a network access control engine. Some customers find it challenging as they do not want to use cloud solutions since Juniper Networks have fully cloud solutions.
Juniper WLC Series has certain shortcomings in traffic monitoring. The product needs to offer better traffic monitoring capabilities to users because sometimes it is impossible to find any information when you need it at a particular point in time.
There could be a high level of security. Additionally, it should be able to manage applications from anywhere in the world, along with remote support services.
One thing to consider is the price; it's quite expensive. Additionally, there could be more information from the controller, and it could be easier to work with the controller lights. It's not easy to bring up the upgrades.
It's much more technical when compared to other companies. The solution could offer more integration with other products. That would make it much better.
Coordinator/Senior IT Specialist at a library with 51-200 employees
Real User
2019-11-04T06:14:00Z
Nov 4, 2019
The biggest issue was that Juniper stopped developing, so we had to look for another solution. If they were to continue development, I would like to see a decent portal functionality, WPA3, and support. Probably some kind of API as well.
Wireless LAN is a network technology that allows devices to connect to the internet and communicate wirelessly within a local area, providing seamless connectivity and mobility for users. Its flexibility makes it a popular choice for businesses aiming to enhance network access without extensive cabling. This technology utilizes radio waves to transmit data, eliminating the need for physical connections through cables. It operates on standard protocols such as IEEE 802.11, which define the...
Juniper lacks a network access control agent similar to solutions like Alubakya Path and Cisco ISE. There should be a network access control engine. Some customers find it challenging as they do not want to use cloud solutions since Juniper Networks have fully cloud solutions.
The network coverage of Juniper WLC Series and Cisco is different. We need to add additional access points.
Juniper WLC Series has certain shortcomings in traffic monitoring. The product needs to offer better traffic monitoring capabilities to users because sometimes it is impossible to find any information when you need it at a particular point in time.
Juniper should provide us with timely assistance to team members. The solution should create configuration documentation.
There could be a high level of security. Additionally, it should be able to manage applications from anywhere in the world, along with remote support services.
One thing to consider is the price; it's quite expensive. Additionally, there could be more information from the controller, and it could be easier to work with the controller lights. It's not easy to bring up the upgrades.
It's much more technical when compared to other companies. The solution could offer more integration with other products. That would make it much better.
We would prefer it if the solution could be less expensive.
The support on offer to other vendors switching - like Aruba or Ruckus - could be improved.
The biggest issue was that Juniper stopped developing, so we had to look for another solution. If they were to continue development, I would like to see a decent portal functionality, WPA3, and support. Probably some kind of API as well.