There should be a notification alarm with geofencing. When a person is at the gate, a notification alarm should alert us, enabling quick identification of who is trying to access our sites, which contain valuable property.
I would like more statistics about what's going on in terms of usage. There is little-to-no usage reporting. That's one thing we've requested, and I think they're working on it.
Security Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jul 12, 2023
The interface is fine. I would like it to be somewhat hidden, similar to Cisco AnyConnect, their secure mobility client. However, it has some cool features for troubleshooting. I can debug things and easily log out. It probably shouldn't be available to everyone. I believe it should be restricted and running behind the scenes for most users. The user interface provides a satisfactory digital experience. I can access the tool and identify the specific user, enabling me to troubleshoot any issues. Moreover, I can utilize the tool to debug their connections and pinpoint the exact cause of the problem. Therefore, I have a positive opinion of the tool. However, some of the technical aspects may be more suitable for individuals with technical expertise. It would be beneficial if the debug interface were slightly more user-friendly, allowing users to examine it independently. Additionally, having documentation on how to send relevant information to the administrators would be helpful, as I am essentially responsible for managing these systems. Establishing trust for every access request, regardless of its origin, is highly beneficial in building trust. Some improvements I would like to see include more thorough debugging of all users, allowing us to identify their precise source, the computer they are using, and possibly additional mobile information. However, as an administrator, I have yet to determine how to utilize certain tools or the ongoing development of logging and monitoring features. One of the things I've noticed is that we need to be more proactive. I would like to find a way to work together and establish a connection between some of our technology interfaces in TechGeek and our SIM. The SIM is a tool that collects data and generates automated alerts. These alerts can be created using our endpoint detection tools or integrated directly into the access tool. Specifically, I aim to improve the automation capabilities of Axis Security. Axis Security has not assisted in freeing up my time to engage in other projects; however, incorporating automation could potentially aid in achieving that objective. I would appreciate more automated learning capabilities or increased integration with other security tools, allowing us to establish automation. One aspect that I would like to enhance pertains to several of the solutions we have employed, which might be unique to our organization. We have frequently had to engage Axis Engineering in the implementation of these solutions, as they are somewhat novel and tailored specifically to our needs. Consequently, I aspire to develop the capability to implement them independently. However, this could potentially be attributed to the complexity inherent in some of our current tools.
Atmos is good for securing infrastructure from end to end, detection and remediation of threats, but there may be a few features that could be added to make it a little easier for networking and security folks to analyze the traffic. There are bad actors out there and they may or may not show up through the tool. That's something they can add. They need to improve the networking and security tools a little in the troubleshooting and "bad-actor" areas to help us analyze security threats a little better. They have some things built in, but I would like to see more advanced tools. There are major vendors out there, and if you use their VPN connection that's not going to help you without buying one of their other products. So that's a similar type of situation. However, they do give you a little more bang for the buck when it comes to monitoring. So I can see an improvement there, in Atmos, in the future.
Axis Security provides secure and seamless access to cloud infrastructures with features that support both modern and legacy applications, enhancing connectivity and performance.As a leader in secure connectivity, Axis Security simplifies access management with its easy deployment and configuration. It integrates directly with Okta for single sign-on and replaces traditional VPNs, ensuring trust for access requests while restricting unauthorized access. Its interface combines Zero Trust...
There should be a notification alarm with geofencing. When a person is at the gate, a notification alarm should alert us, enabling quick identification of who is trying to access our sites, which contain valuable property.
The support team should be more skilled in offering assistance.
I would like more detailed logging in the Axis Security interface.
I would like more statistics about what's going on in terms of usage. There is little-to-no usage reporting. That's one thing we've requested, and I think they're working on it.
The interface is fine. I would like it to be somewhat hidden, similar to Cisco AnyConnect, their secure mobility client. However, it has some cool features for troubleshooting. I can debug things and easily log out. It probably shouldn't be available to everyone. I believe it should be restricted and running behind the scenes for most users. The user interface provides a satisfactory digital experience. I can access the tool and identify the specific user, enabling me to troubleshoot any issues. Moreover, I can utilize the tool to debug their connections and pinpoint the exact cause of the problem. Therefore, I have a positive opinion of the tool. However, some of the technical aspects may be more suitable for individuals with technical expertise. It would be beneficial if the debug interface were slightly more user-friendly, allowing users to examine it independently. Additionally, having documentation on how to send relevant information to the administrators would be helpful, as I am essentially responsible for managing these systems. Establishing trust for every access request, regardless of its origin, is highly beneficial in building trust. Some improvements I would like to see include more thorough debugging of all users, allowing us to identify their precise source, the computer they are using, and possibly additional mobile information. However, as an administrator, I have yet to determine how to utilize certain tools or the ongoing development of logging and monitoring features. One of the things I've noticed is that we need to be more proactive. I would like to find a way to work together and establish a connection between some of our technology interfaces in TechGeek and our SIM. The SIM is a tool that collects data and generates automated alerts. These alerts can be created using our endpoint detection tools or integrated directly into the access tool. Specifically, I aim to improve the automation capabilities of Axis Security. Axis Security has not assisted in freeing up my time to engage in other projects; however, incorporating automation could potentially aid in achieving that objective. I would appreciate more automated learning capabilities or increased integration with other security tools, allowing us to establish automation. One aspect that I would like to enhance pertains to several of the solutions we have employed, which might be unique to our organization. We have frequently had to engage Axis Engineering in the implementation of these solutions, as they are somewhat novel and tailored specifically to our needs. Consequently, I aspire to develop the capability to implement them independently. However, this could potentially be attributed to the complexity inherent in some of our current tools.
Atmos is good for securing infrastructure from end to end, detection and remediation of threats, but there may be a few features that could be added to make it a little easier for networking and security folks to analyze the traffic. There are bad actors out there and they may or may not show up through the tool. That's something they can add. They need to improve the networking and security tools a little in the troubleshooting and "bad-actor" areas to help us analyze security threats a little better. They have some things built in, but I would like to see more advanced tools. There are major vendors out there, and if you use their VPN connection that's not going to help you without buying one of their other products. So that's a similar type of situation. However, they do give you a little more bang for the buck when it comes to monitoring. So I can see an improvement there, in Atmos, in the future.