2018-07-01T06:59:00Z
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 0
  • 12

What is your primary use case for Eggplant Functional?

How do you or your organization use this solution?

Please share with us so that your peers can learn from your experiences.

Thank you!

3
PeerSpot user
3 Answers
DanielWildermuth - PeerSpot reviewer
Testing Tools Expert at Helvetia Versicherungen
Real User
2019-11-17T06:50:00Z
Nov 17, 2019

I'm a Test Tool Expert and we're customers of Eggplant Functional and have a good relationship with them. We were the first company in Switzerland to use them. We automate regression tests and there are eight people in the company currently using the product - some are testers and some developers. On a given day there would two or three people using the product, others might use it once a week or once a month.

Search for a product comparison
NN
Test lead/Senior Mobile Automation QA at a non-tech company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2019-07-31T05:52:00Z
Jul 31, 2019

We evaluated this solution and began writing code, but we are not comfortable coding in Eggplant so we are not buying it. We are definitely moving to an open-source solution.

it_user433410 - PeerSpot reviewer
Teamleader Test Software at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2018-07-01T06:59:00Z
Jul 1, 2018

GUI testing is the strength of the tool. We have been satisfied with the tool, and not only the tool, but the service behind it. The tool works as expected, and the response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial.

Learn what your peers think about Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2022.
657,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Netanya Carmi - PeerSpot reviewer
Content Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Dec 13, 2021
Which is better and why?
See 1 answer
Janet Staver - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech Blogger
Dec 13, 2021
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate through pages and sections of an app quickly and easily, even including things like clicking, scrolling down, tagging, putting through SendKeys, as well as other actions that need testing in an application. One drawback to Selenium HQ is that there is no object repository like the one that can be found in QTP, which is ironic since continuous integration practices have lately become more common. Also, it can sometimes be hard to create locators for elements and because they are deeply embedded it can take a long time to do so. Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence is similarly fantastic. With their newest release, you can test via scripts instead of models using the controller. In addition, the model-based test automation they offer helps reduce the test maintenance process. The solution is also equipped to uncover critical bugs and to verify if and when they have been fixed. However, I think the integrated development environment could use some improvement. It lacks shortcut commands that can help create functions and it would also be helpful if the solution provided features to address complex plans, which at the moment it does not. Their online help and user support documentation is also outdated, which can be frustrating at times. In general, though, it is a good product and it has good scalability. Conclusion: I think Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence is a good solution for significantly reducing testing time spent while also increasing accuracy and producing precise results. However, if you are looking for the best tool out there for automated testing, I think Selenium HQ is best because it is highly customizable.
it_user434868 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director of Delivery at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Mar 18, 2022
Hi, We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information. Please share what you can so you can help your peers.
2 out of 4 answers
Jon Goranson - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Analyst at a transportation company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jun 3, 2021
In terms of deployment of the solution, we have an internal server in a private cloud running the licensing machine and we have three dev licenses for the product as well as two run-time licenses. The development license allows you to run Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and allows you to test it and run your script. The runtime license is what is used when you set up a schedule. All it needs is a run-time license to run the executables and run the tests. But since you don't need the full Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence Functional IDE, you just need the run-time license.
DH
Senior VP Operations at comScore
Aug 5, 2021
Depending on your use cases, it's prudent to look around at some other solutions if you feel there are others that offer similar features. If you choose Eggplant, you should evaluate how you're going to use it and make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software. Beyond the standard licensing fees there is just the cost of the resources it takes to do the work of utilizing Eggplant. And that is much better than the alternative of manual testing. There are almost negligible hardware costs. We have Eggplant running on commodity workstations that aren't anything special or expensive. I wouldn't consider it a significant expense to host it.
Download Free Report
Download our free Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
657,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.