Head of Global Network Infrastructure at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Apr 23, 2020
It's strictly for outbound NAT-ing to the internet. We are taking internal IPs and masking them from a private IP to a public IP to get to the internet. For this application, everything is hosted on-prem. We are not using a cloud instance of this solution, but we do have cloud-based third-party solutions that are not associated with the A10 product.
Network Engineer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Mar 11, 2020
We use it for Carrier Grade NAT. We are a university with a lot of students. We use this solution to provide Internet access to students from our wireless network. Currently, we're using 2.8.1-P1 Build 11 on most of the devices. I think we might have a different build on a couple of them.
Juniper MX Series Routers and A10 Networks Thunder CGN are competing in network solutions. Juniper MX Series holds an advantage with its comprehensive feature set and high data throughput, while A10 Networks Thunder CGN is stronger in carrier-grade NAT functionality.Features: Juniper MX Series offers robust scalability, high-performance forwarding, and advanced MPLS capabilities. A10 Networks Thunder CGN provides efficient IPv4 to IPv6 transition, high availability, and DDoS protection.Ease...
It's strictly for outbound NAT-ing to the internet. We are taking internal IPs and masking them from a private IP to a public IP to get to the internet. For this application, everything is hosted on-prem. We are not using a cloud instance of this solution, but we do have cloud-based third-party solutions that are not associated with the A10 product.
We use it for Carrier Grade NAT. We are a university with a lot of students. We use this solution to provide Internet access to students from our wireless network. Currently, we're using 2.8.1-P1 Build 11 on most of the devices. I think we might have a different build on a couple of them.