2019-09-19T08:40:00Z
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 0
  • 6

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NICE Robotic Automation?

Hi,

We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information.

Please share what you can so you can help your peers.

2
PeerSpot user
2 Answers
GS
RPA Solution Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2021-05-01T09:39:07Z
May 1, 2021

As per my understanding, UiPath has a much lesser cost than NICE, but I am not sure.

Search for a product comparison
Marc Lee-Smith - PeerSpot reviewer
Group RPA & AI Platform Manager at Thomas Cook
Real User
2019-09-19T08:40:00Z
Sep 19, 2019

We just moved to an enterprise license agreement. It's an all-you-can-eat license, so we don't have to count the licenses anymore. We have perpetual licenses with NICE and we pay an annual maintenance fee on them. We've made a significant financial commitment to NICE. It shows that we are fully committed to NICE and to continuing the growth of automation within the group.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, UiPath, Blue Prism and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: November 2022.
657,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
May 1, 2021
Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with NICE Robotic Automation. What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
2 out of 3 answers
Marc Lee-Smith - PeerSpot reviewer
Group RPA & AI Platform Manager at Thomas Cook
Sep 19, 2019
The one thing I'd like to see, and NICE is already heavily investing in it, is improvement in the user interface itself. They call it the Designer and it's what the developers use. It is a bit clunky; that is the polite way to put it. I'd like to see it be a bit more user-friendly, a bit more intuitive, and to move to something a bit more web-based, so they could develop though the browser for Excel. I believe NICE is already heavily investing in that, and I'm looking forward to getting my hands on that to have a quick play.
MG
Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Apr 30, 2021
We haven't found it to be as powerful as some of the other platforms. From a true RPA perspective, it is pretty far behind some of the other solutions. It has emerged as a more desktop automation kind of tool, but it lacks a lot of enterprise features. It is not really a true RPA because of its licensing, which is kind of user-initiated. It would be nice it can be deployed at a more enterprise licensing model versus a user-based model. It didn't have autonomous automation so far, and they have just released this feature. They have kind of hodgepodged a bunch of products together to get there, but it is not as seamless as other solutions.
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
May 19, 2022
Hi, We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information. Please share what you can so you can help your peers.
2 out of 3 answers
Marc Lee-Smith - PeerSpot reviewer
Group RPA & AI Platform Manager at Thomas Cook
Sep 19, 2019
We just moved to an enterprise license agreement. It's an all-you-can-eat license, so we don't have to count the licenses anymore. We have perpetual licenses with NICE and we pay an annual maintenance fee on them. We've made a significant financial commitment to NICE. It shows that we are fully committed to NICE and to continuing the growth of automation within the group.
GS
RPA Solution Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
May 1, 2021
As per my understanding, UiPath has a much lesser cost than NICE, but I am not sure.
Download Free Report
Download our free Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Report and find out what your peers are saying about NICE, UiPath, Blue Prism, and more! Updated: November 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
657,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.