Director of Product Management at SID GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LLC
Real User
Top 5
2024-03-19T10:30:57Z
Mar 19, 2024
I've operated with Amazon S3 Glacier in two modes. Firstly, there's the trial mode, where I experimented with the platform, learned its functionalities, and applied it to my work. Secondly, there's the corporate account mode, where my team handles the operations, and I receive billing reports.
If it were cheaper, I'd be happier. I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is a yearly basis license. There are some other services that are linked with it as well.
It is more expensive compared to on-premises solutions. Amazon S3 Glacier might seem pricier over three years than on-premise servers, but it has perks like lower upfront costs and no need for internal remote engineers. If treated as an operational expense, the advantages often outweigh the long-term cost.
Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.
I've operated with Amazon S3 Glacier in two modes. Firstly, there's the trial mode, where I experimented with the platform, learned its functionalities, and applied it to my work. Secondly, there's the corporate account mode, where my team handles the operations, and I receive billing reports.
Amazon S3 Glacier is not an expensive solution, and it has a pay-as-you-go pricing model.
The vendor must provide a cheaper solution. The tool is too expensive. It must be made more cost-effective.
We pay a monthly licensing fee. It is expensive.
We pay a monthly licensing fee for Amazon S3 Glacier. There will be additional costs if you install other apps and features.
If it were cheaper, I'd be happier. I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is a yearly basis license. There are some other services that are linked with it as well.
We don't pay for licenses. We pay based on consumption data, considering how much data is stored.
It is more expensive compared to on-premises solutions. Amazon S3 Glacier might seem pricier over three years than on-premise servers, but it has perks like lower upfront costs and no need for internal remote engineers. If treated as an operational expense, the advantages often outweigh the long-term cost.
Amazon S3 Glacier is a little expensive solution.
Amazon S3 Glacier has a good pricing point, and you pay for what's being used.
We pay a monthly licensing fee. The pricing must be improved. The solution must provide discounts for the education sector.
Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving.
We pay a monthly license fee for the solution. We pay for what we use. Pricing is the biggest disadvantage of the solution.
Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive.
The price is fair. I would rate the pricing model a two out of ten, with one being the lowest price and ten being the highest price.
The product is cheap.
The solution is cost-effective.
There is no license, you pay for what you use.
Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products.