Our customers often do a trade-off between requiring services at particular SLA levels and being willing to pay a premium price to us as partners. While the services can be costly, the value for money depends on these trade-offs.
The pricing of Amazon Elastic Container Service is very competitive compared to Azure and quite cheap compared to Google, particularly for hosting databases.
AWS Cloud and DevOps Consultant | Solutions Architect at Devoteam Management Consulting
Consultant
Top 10
Sep 25, 2024
The pricing for ECS Fargate is based on resource consumption, particularly CPU and memory usage per hour. Although it may be more expensive than other solutions, it saves costs on infrastructure maintenance, making it reasonable overall.
Learn what your peers think about Amazon Elastic Container Service. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
The solution's pricing is nominal. Also, it manages all the servers, mainly when certain servers might experience slowdowns. Amazon EC2 offers features that don't affect the website or application's performance.
EC2 is cheap based on two main factors: the AMI you're using and the volume size. You need to be wary of those things. If you use the free ones, you will not incur any cost. But if you increase the sizes, you incur costs to your accounts.
The solution is pricey. There are three things a solution can be or have: it can be quick, cheap, or have quality. We can't have three at the same time. If you have money and time, you have quality, which is the case with Amazon. Amazon is pricey, but we can do things quickly, and there's quality. However, you can have the free tier with Amazon, where it will work for small companies, but only for a short time. If you only want a small VPS, use Google, which will be free forever.
Senior Software and Cloud Engineer at Velocis Technologies LLC
Real User
Jul 19, 2022
You pay for only the time you have used the on-demand service. For example, if you are using software that does a lot of computation or analyzing your data for your company, you only pay for that time spent analyzing that data. The rest of the time, you don't pay for it. Although I like the per second billing, the cost of it, even if you are being billed per second, it is still higher than competitor products.
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.
Our customers often do a trade-off between requiring services at particular SLA levels and being willing to pay a premium price to us as partners. While the services can be costly, the value for money depends on these trade-offs.
The pricing of Amazon Elastic Container Service is very competitive compared to Azure and quite cheap compared to Google, particularly for hosting databases.
The pricing for ECS Fargate is based on resource consumption, particularly CPU and memory usage per hour. Although it may be more expensive than other solutions, it saves costs on infrastructure maintenance, making it reasonable overall.
Amazon ECS is expensive.
The product's pricing is good.
They offer a pay-as-you-go pricing model for the product. It is inexpensive compared to Kubernetes, which considers a minimum number of microservices.
Amazon EC2 Container Service is cheap.
The tool's cost is good.
The pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service is average.
The licensing is expensive. The licensing is available on a monthly basis, yearly basis, and a pay-as-you-go licensing model.
The solution's pricing is nominal. Also, it manages all the servers, mainly when certain servers might experience slowdowns. Amazon EC2 offers features that don't affect the website or application's performance.
EC2 is cheap based on two main factors: the AMI you're using and the volume size. You need to be wary of those things. If you use the free ones, you will not incur any cost. But if you increase the sizes, you incur costs to your accounts.
The solution is pricey. There are three things a solution can be or have: it can be quick, cheap, or have quality. We can't have three at the same time. If you have money and time, you have quality, which is the case with Amazon. Amazon is pricey, but we can do things quickly, and there's quality. However, you can have the free tier with Amazon, where it will work for small companies, but only for a short time. If you only want a small VPS, use Google, which will be free forever.
Amazon EC2 Container Service is priced high.
I rate the pricing a five out of ten.
We emphasize that utilizing any cloud solution with payments in dollars is a huge amount for our liaison here.
The pricing is good.
You pay for only the time you have used the on-demand service. For example, if you are using software that does a lot of computation or analyzing your data for your company, you only pay for that time spent analyzing that data. The rest of the time, you don't pay for it. Although I like the per second billing, the cost of it, even if you are being billed per second, it is still higher than competitor products.
The pricing depends on the region in which you're using it. Most probably if you're using it in the UAE or South Africa, the price may get lower.