I recommend using Securonix UEBA as it reduces the time for deployment and offers a customizable UEBA analytics dashboard covering most use cases. Overall, I would rate Securonix UEBA eight out of ten.
Executive Vice President,Global Head at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jul 29, 2022
It is a good tool. They can evaluate based on their business use case and requirements, and it will work. I will rate them based on their scalability, flexibility, and adoption, as well as their specific analysis of threat detection via behavioral models. And, of course, there's the price. It is less expensive than the others. also deployment simplicity, it's simple to set up. It's not difficult. We are partners as well as resellers. I would rate Securonix UEBA an eight out of ten.
Lead Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Reseller
Feb 4, 2022
I would give this solution and 8 out of 10. Make sure that you get the training properly and get a hold of the correct people so that things are done properly. Don't try to find a way in the middle.
The biggest lesson I have seen from using Securonix is that you should never underestimate how complex and large scale a client deployment could be. Prior to Securonix coming to us, they had huge success in different sectors with big and small companies, until they had us. We were a challenge. We have successfully overcome the challenges and proved they're the best. But everybody who went through that process learned a lot about never underestimating how complex a client can become and how demanding they can be. My advice would be to consider Securonix. You can horizontally compare competitors across the space but really pay attention to what they can offer. That's how they impressed us when we compared. Sometimes you can't tell the difference until you compare different varieties of apples. Sometimes, when we asked the same question to five vendors, four of them didn't even understand what the question meant. That was an indication in and of itself and showed the difference. So pay attention to this player and compare them against others. That's going to make you more confident. Don't pass over this one. Within our company, the number of users who are using the platform to monitor threats and develop content is less than ten people. It's a very controlled user group because of the sensitivity of the user data and the activity data within the platform. We have a dedicated team within the chief security office called the Insider Threat Program Team. They are responsible for operational monitoring, keeping the system up, developing content, and responding to the findings. They do all things connected with the platform. But the platform itself monitors a user-base of 600,000 people. In terms of deployment and maintenance, we have two people from our group who are leading that effort but in the background, with regard to the data center deployment, there are a bunch of people supporting it from that perspective. We don't use their cloud monitoring functionality but we are interested in that area too. Overall, I would rate the solution at ten out of ten. There have been a lot of challenges, but the more we face challenges and I see how we work through them, the more confident we are in this product.
Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) leverages sophisticated machine learning and behavior analytics to analyze and correlate interactions between users, systems, applications, IP addresses, and data. Light, nimble, and quick to deploy, Securonix UEBA detects advanced insider threats, cyber threats, fraud, cloud data compromise, and non-compliance. Built-in automated response playbooks and customizable case management work flows allow your security team to respond to threats...
I recommend using Securonix UEBA as it reduces the time for deployment and offers a customizable UEBA analytics dashboard covering most use cases. Overall, I would rate Securonix UEBA eight out of ten.
It is a good tool. They can evaluate based on their business use case and requirements, and it will work. I will rate them based on their scalability, flexibility, and adoption, as well as their specific analysis of threat detection via behavioral models. And, of course, there's the price. It is less expensive than the others. also deployment simplicity, it's simple to set up. It's not difficult. We are partners as well as resellers. I would rate Securonix UEBA an eight out of ten.
I would give this solution and 8 out of 10. Make sure that you get the training properly and get a hold of the correct people so that things are done properly. Don't try to find a way in the middle.
The biggest lesson I have seen from using Securonix is that you should never underestimate how complex and large scale a client deployment could be. Prior to Securonix coming to us, they had huge success in different sectors with big and small companies, until they had us. We were a challenge. We have successfully overcome the challenges and proved they're the best. But everybody who went through that process learned a lot about never underestimating how complex a client can become and how demanding they can be. My advice would be to consider Securonix. You can horizontally compare competitors across the space but really pay attention to what they can offer. That's how they impressed us when we compared. Sometimes you can't tell the difference until you compare different varieties of apples. Sometimes, when we asked the same question to five vendors, four of them didn't even understand what the question meant. That was an indication in and of itself and showed the difference. So pay attention to this player and compare them against others. That's going to make you more confident. Don't pass over this one. Within our company, the number of users who are using the platform to monitor threats and develop content is less than ten people. It's a very controlled user group because of the sensitivity of the user data and the activity data within the platform. We have a dedicated team within the chief security office called the Insider Threat Program Team. They are responsible for operational monitoring, keeping the system up, developing content, and responding to the findings. They do all things connected with the platform. But the platform itself monitors a user-base of 600,000 people. In terms of deployment and maintenance, we have two people from our group who are leading that effort but in the background, with regard to the data center deployment, there are a bunch of people supporting it from that perspective. We don't use their cloud monitoring functionality but we are interested in that area too. Overall, I would rate the solution at ten out of ten. There have been a lot of challenges, but the more we face challenges and I see how we work through them, the more confident we are in this product.